Haemodynamic and catecholamine stress responses to the Laryngeal Tube-Suction Airway and the Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway

Anaesthesia

Volumn 61, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 330-334

  Dahaba, Ashraf A ^a   Prax, N ^a   Gaube, W ^a   Gries, M ^a   Rehak, P H ^a   Metzler, H ^a  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF GRAZ   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADRENALIN; ANALGESIC AGENT; CATECHOLAMINE; FENTANYL; MIDAZOLAM; NORADRENALIN; PIRITRAMIDE; PROPOFOL; REMIFENTANIL; ROCURONIUM;

ADRENALIN BLOOD LEVEL; ADULT; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE REMOVAL; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; LARYNGEAL MASK; LARYNGEAL TUBE; MALE; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; NORADRENALIN BLOOD LEVEL; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TUBE; ADOLESCENT; BLOOD; BLOOD PRESSURE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; MIDDLE AGED; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; STRESS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BLOOD PRESSURE; DEVICE REMOVAL; EPINEPHRINE; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; LARYNGEAL MASKS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NOREPINEPHRINE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STRESS;

EID: 33645912586     PISSN: 00032409     EISSN: 13652044     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2006.04548.x     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Brain AIJ, Verghese C, Strube PJ. The LMA 'ProSeal' - a laryngeal mask with an oesophageal vent. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2000; 84: 650-4.
2. Doerges V, Ocker H, Wenzel V, Steinfath M, Gerlach K. The Laryngeal Tube S: A modified simple airway device. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2003; 96: 618-21.
3. Oczenski W, Krenn H, Dahaba AA, et al. Hemodynamic and catecholamine stress responses to insertion of the Combitube, Laryngeal Mask Airway or tracheal intubation. Anesthesia and Analgesia 1999; 88: 1389-94.
4. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: Revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet 2001; 357: 1191-4.
5. Gaitini LA, Vaida SJ, Somri M, Yanovski B, Ben-David B, Hagberg CA. A randomized controlled trial comparing the ProSeal™ Laryngeal Mask Airway with the Laryngeal Tube Suction in mechanically ventilated patients. Anesthesiology 2004; 101: 316-20.
6. Brimacombe J, Richardson C, Keller C, Donald S. Mechanical closure of the vocal cords with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal TM. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2002; 88: 296-7.
7. Matioc AA. The 'bouncing sign' may optimize the insertion of the laryngeal tube. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 2004; 51: 278-9.
8. Marquez X, Marquez A. A new laryngeal tube. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2003; 96: 1837-46.
9. Cook TM, McCormick B, Asai T. Randomized comparison of laryngeal tube with classic laryngeal mask airway for anaesthesia with controlled ventilation. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2003; 91: 373-8.
10. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Brimacombe L. A comparison of the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal™ and the laryngeal tube airway in paralyzed anesthetized adult patients undergoing pressure-controlled ventilation. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2002; 95: 770-6.
11. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Roth W, Loeckinger A. Large cuff volumes impede posterior pharyngeal mucosal perfusion with the laryngeal tube airway. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2002; 49: 1084-7.
12. Keller C, Brimacombe J. Mucosal pressure and oropharyngal leak pressure with the ProSeal versus laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized paralysed patients. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2000; 85: 262-6.
13. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Puehringer F. Pharyngeal mucosal pressure and perfusion. A fiberoptic evaluation of the posterior pharynx in anesthetized adult patients with a modified cuffed oropharyngeal airway. Anesthesiology 1999; 91: 1661-5.