Revisiting Santa Rosalia to unfold a degeneracy of classic models of speciation

American Naturalist

Volumn 180, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 388-393

  Norvaišas, Povilas ^a   Kisdi, Eva ^b  

^a VILNIUS UNIVERSITY   (Lithuania)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

Assortative mating; Asymmetric penetrance; Loss of polymorphism; Magic trait; Sympatric speciation

Indexed keywords

ANGIOSPERM; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; FEMALE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; MALE; MATE CHOICE; NOTE; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION;

ANGIOSPERMS; ANIMALS; FEMALE; GENETIC SPECIATION; MALE; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84864694017     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/667215     Document Type: Note

References (30)

1. Bolnick, D. I., and B. M. Fitzpatrick. 2007. Sympatric speciation: models and empirical evidence. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 38:459-487.
2. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 2004. Speciation. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
3. Doebeli, M. 1996. A quantitative genetic competition model for sympatric speciation. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 9:893-909.
4. Felsenstein, J. 1981. Scepticism towards Santa Rosalia, or why are there so few kinds of animals? Evolution 35:124-138.
5. Gavrilets, S. 2004. Fitness landscapes and the origin of species. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
6. Gavrilets, S. 2006. The Maynard Smith model of sympatric speciation. Journal of Theoretical Biology 239:172-182.
7. Gavrilets, S., and C. R. B. Boake. 1998. On the evolution of premating isolation after a founder event. American Naturalist 152:706-716.
8. Gavrilets, S., and A. Vose. 2007. Case studies and mathematical models of ecological speciation. 2. Palms on an oceanic island. Molecular Ecology 16:2910-2921.
9. Hoekstra, R. F., R. Bijlsma, and J. Dolman. 1985. Polymorphism from environmental heterogeneity: models are only robust if the heterozygote is close in fitness to the favoured homozygote in each environment. Genetics Research 45:299-314.
10. Kirkpatrick, M., and S. L. Nuismer. 2004. Sexual selection can constrain sympatric speciation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 271:687-693.
11. Kirkpatrick, M., and V. Ravigne. 2002. Speciation by natural and sexual selection: models and experiments. American Naturalist 159(suppl.):S22-S35.
12. Kisdi, E., and T. Priklopil. 2011. Evolutionary branching of a magic trait. Journal of Mathematical Biology 63:361-397.
13. Kopp, M., and J. Hermisson. 2008. Competitive speciation and costs of choosiness. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 21:1005-1023.
14. Levene, H. 1953. Genetic equilibrium when more than one ecological niche is available. American Naturalist 87:331-333.
15. MacNair, M. R., and M. Gardner. 1998. The evolution of edaphic endemics. Pages 157-171 in D. J. Howard and S. H. Berlocher, eds. Endless forms: species and speciation. OxfordUniversity Press, Oxford.
16. Matessi, C., A. Gimelfarb, and S. Gavrilets. 2001. Long-term buildup of reproductive isolation promoted by disruptive selection: how far does it go? Selection 2:41-64.
17. Maynard Smith, J. 1966. Sympatric speciation. Am. Nat. 100:637-650.
18. O'Donald, P. 1960. Assortative mating in a population in which two alleles are segregating. Heredity 15:389-396.
19. Otto, S. P., M. R. Servedio, and S. L. Nuismer. 2008. Frequencydependent selection and the evolution of assortative mating. Genetics 179:2091-2112.
20. Pennings, P. S., M. Kopp, G. Meszena, U. Dieckmann, and J. Hermisson. 2008. An analytically tractable model for competitive speciation. American Naturalist 171:E44-E71.
21. Ripa, J. 2009. When is sympatric speciation truly adaptive? an analysis of the joint evolution of resource utilization and assortative mating. Evolutionary Ecology 23:31-52.
22. Santos, H., C. Burban, J. Rousselet, J.-P. Rossi, M. Branco, and C. Kerdelhue. 2011. Incipient allochronic speciation in the pine processionary moth (Thaumetopoea pityocampa, Lepidoptera, Notodontidae). Journal of Evolutionary Biology 24:146-158.
23. Savolainen, V., M.-C. Anstett, C. Lexer, I. Hutton, J. J. Clarkson, M. V. Norup, M. P. Powell, D. Springate, N. Salamin, andW. J. Baker. 2006. Sympatric speciation in palms on an oceanic island. Nature 441:210-213.
24. Schneider, K. A. 2005. Competitive divergence in non-random mating populations. Theoretical Population Biology 68:105-118.
25. Schneider, K. A., and R. Bürger. 2006. Does competitive divergence occur if assortative mating is costly? Journal of Evolutionary Biology 19:570-588.
26. Servedio, M. R. 2009. The role of linkage disequilibrium in the evolution of premating isolation. Heredity 102:51-56.
27. Servedio, M. R., and M. A. F. Noor. 2003. The role of reinforcement in speciation: theory and data. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 34:339-364.
28. Servedio, M. R., G. S. van Doorn, M. Kopp, A. Frame, and P. Nosil. 2011. Magic traits in speciation: "magic" but not rare. Trends Ecology & Evolution 26:389-397.
29. Stearns, S. C. 1992. The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
30. Udovic, D. 1980. Frequency-dependent selection, disruptive selection, and the evolution of reproductive isolation. American Naturalist 116:621-641.