Competitive speciation and costs of choosiness

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 1005-1023

  Kopp, M ^a,b,c   Hermisson, J ^b,c  

^a Ludwig Maximilian University Munich ^*  (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

Assortative mating; Competition; Costs of choosiness; Disruptive selection; Female choice; Frequency dependent selection; Invasion fitness; Population genetic model; Sexual selection; Sympatric speciation

Indexed keywords

ASSORTATIVE MATING; COMPETITION (ECOLOGY); FEMALE BEHAVIOR; MATING BEHAVIOR; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SEXUAL SELECTION; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY); SURVIVAL; SYMPATRY;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVOLUTION; GENETIC SELECTION; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR;

ANIMALS; EVOLUTION; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SELECTION (GENETICS); SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL;

EID: 45149085488     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01547.x     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Andolfatto, P. 2007. Hitchhiking effects of recurrent beneficial amino acid substitutions in the Drosophila melanogaster genome. Genome Res. 17:1755 1762.
2. Arnegard, M.E. Kondrashov, A.S. 2004. Sympatric speciation by sexual selection alone is unlikely. Evolution 58:222 237.
3. Barluega, M., Stölting, K.N., Salzburger, W., Muschik, M. Meyer, A. 2006a. Reply: evidence for sympatric speciation Nature 444:E13.
4. Barluega, M., Stölting, K.N., Salzburger, W., Muschik, M. Meyer, A. 2006b. Sympatric speciation in Nicaraguan crater lake cichlid fish. Nature 439:719 723.
5. Bolnick, D.I. 2004. Waiting for sympatric speciation. Evolution 58:895 899.
6. Bolnick, D.I. 2006. Multi-species outcomes in a common model of sympatric speciation. J. Theor. Biol. 241:734 744.
7. Bolnick, D.I. Fitzpatrick, B.M. 2007. Sympatric speciation: models and empirical evidence. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 38:459 487.
8. Bürger, R. Schneider, K. 2006. Intraspecific competitive divergence and convergence under assortative mating. Am. Nat. 167:190 205.
9. Bürger, R., Schneider, K. Willensdorfer, M. 2006. The conditions for speciation through intraspecific competition. Evolution 60:2185 2206.
10. Byers, J.A., Wiseman, P.A., Jones, L. Roffe, T.J. 2005. A large cost of female mate sampling in pronghorn. Am. Nat. 166:661 668.
11. Byers, J.A., Byers, A.A. Dunn, S.J. 2006. A dry summer diminishes mate search effort by pronghorn females: evidence for a significant cost of mate search. Ethology 112:74 80.
12. de Cara, M.A.R., Barton, N.H. Kirkpatrick, M. 2008. The evolution of assortative mating. Am. Nat. 171:580 596.
13. Coyne, J.A. Orr, H.A. 2004. Speciation. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
14. Dieckmann, U. Doebeli, M. 1999. On the origin of species by sympatric speciation. Nature 400:354 357.
15. Dieckmann, U. Law, R. 1996. The dynamical theory of coevolution: a derivation from stochastic ecological processes. J. Math. Biol. 34:579 612.
16. Dieckmann, U. Metz, J.A.J. 2006. Surprising evolutionary predictions from enhanced ecological realism. Theor. Popul. Biol. 69:263 281.
17. Dieckmann, U., Doebeli, M., Metz, J.A.J. Tautz, D. (eds) 2004. Adaptive Speciation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
18. Doebeli, M. 1996. A quantitative genetic competition model for sympatric speciation. J. Evol. Biol. 9:893 909.
19. Doebeli, M. 2005. Adaptive speciation when assortative mating is based on female preference for male marker traits. J. Evol. Biol. 18:1587 1600.
20. Doebeli, M. Dieckmann, U. 2000. Evolutionary branching and sympatric speciation caused by different types of ecological interactions. Am. Nat. 156:S77 S101.
21. Doebeli, M. Dieckmann, U. 2003. Speciation along environmental gradients. Nature 421:259 264.
22. Doebeli, M. Dieckmann, U. 2005. Adaptive dynamics as a mathematical tool for studying the ecology of speciation processes. J. Evol. Biol. 18:1194 1200.
23. Doebeli, M., Dieckmann, U., Metz, J.A.J. Tautz, D. 2005. What we have also learned: adaptive speciation is theoretically plausible. Evolution 59:691 695.
24. Doebeli, M., Blok, H.J., Leimar, O. Dieckmann, U. 2007. Multimodal pattern formation in phenotype distributions of sexual populations. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 274:347 357.
25. Drossel, B. McKane, A. 2000. Competitive speciation in quantitative genetics models. J. Theor. Biol. 204:467 478.
26. Gíslason, D., Ferguson, M.M., Skúlason, S. Snorasson, S.S. 1999. Rapid and coupled phenotypic differentiation in Icelandic Arctic char (Salvelinus alpinus). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 56:2229 2234.
27. Gavrilets, S. 2004. Fitness Landscapes and the Origin of Species. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
28. Gavrilets, S. 2005. 'Adaptive speciation'- it is not that easy: a reply to Doebeli et al. Evolution 59:696 699.
29. Gavrilets, S. Boake, C.R.B. 1998. On the evolution of premating isolation after a founder event. Am. Nat. 152:706 716.
30. Geritz, S.A.H., Kisdi, E., Meszéna, G. Metz, J.A.J. 1998. Evolutionary singular strategies and the adaptive growth and branching of the evolutionary tree. Evol. Ecol. 12:35 57.
31. Gibson, R.M. Bachman, G.C. 1992. The costs of female choice in a lekking species. Behav. Ecol. 3:300 309.
32. Godin, J.G.G. Briggs, S.E. 1996. Female mate choice under predation risk. Anim. Behav. 51:117 130.
33. Gourbiere, S. 2004. How do natural and sexual selection contribute to sympatric speciation J. Evol. Biol. 17:1297 1309.
34. Gourbiere, S. Mallet, J. 2005. Has adaptive dynamics contributed to the understanding of adaptive and sympatric speciation J. Evol. Biol. 18:1201 1204.
35. Hammerstein, P. 1996. Darwinian adaptation, population genetics and the streetcar theory of evolution. J. Math. Biol. 34:511 532.
36. Ito, H.C. Shimada, M. 2007. Niche expansion: coupled evolutionary branching of niche position and width. Evol. Ecol. Res. 9:675 695.
37. Kirkpatrick, M. Nuismer, S.L. 2004. Sexual selection can constrain sympatric speciation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271:687 693.
38. Kirkpatrick, M. Ravigné, V. 2002. Speciation by natural and sexual selection: models and experiments. Am. Nat. 159:S22 S35.
39. Kisdi, E. Geritz, S.A.H. 1999. Evolutionary dynamics and sympatric speciation in diploid populations. Interim Report IR-99-048, International Institute for Applied System Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.
40. Kokko, H., Jennions, M.D. Brooks, R. 2006. Unifying and testing models of sexual selection. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 37:43 66.
41. Kondrashov, A.S. Kondrashov, F.A. 1999. Interactions among quantitative traits in the course of sympatric speciation. Nature 400:351 354.
42. Matessi, C., Gimelfarb, A. Gavrilets, S. 2001. Long-term buildup of reproductive isolation promoted by disruptive selection: how far does it go Selection 2:41 64.
43. Mayo, O. Bürger, R. 1997. The evolution of dominance: a theory whose time has passed Biol. Rev. 72:97 110.
44. Metz, H., Nisbet, R.M. Geritz, S.A.H. 1992. How should we define fitness for general ecological scenarios Trends Ecol. Evol. 7:198 202.
45. Milinski, M. Bakker, T.C.M. 1992. Costs influence sequential mate choice in sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 250:229 233.
46. Otto, S.P., Servedio, M. Nuismer, S. in press. Frequency-dependent selection and the evolution of assortative mating. Genetics.
47. Peischl, S. Bürger, R. 2008. Evolution of dominance under frequency-dependent intraspecific competition. J. Theor. Biol. 251:210 226.
48. Pennings, P.S., Kopp, M., Meszéna, G., Dieckmann, U. Hermisson, J. 2008. An analytically tractable model of competitive speciation. Am. Nat. 171:E44 E71.
49. Polechová, J. Barton, N.H. 2005. Speciation through competition: a critical review. Evolution 59:1194 1210.
50. Ripa, J. in press. When is sympatric speciation truly adaptive? An analysis of the joint evolution of resource utilization and assortative mating. Evol. Ecol.
51. Rosenzweig, M.L. 1978. Competitive speciation. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 10:275 289.
52. Roughgarden, J. 1972. Evolution of niche width. Am. Nat. 106:683 718.
53. Savolainen, V., Anstett, M.C., Lexer, C., Hutton, I., Clarkson, J.J., Norup, M.V., Powell, M.P., Springate, D., Salamin, N. Baker, W.J. 2006a. Sympatric speciation in palms on an oceanic island. Nature 441:210 213.
54. Savolainen, V., Lexer, C., Anstett, M.C., Hutton, I., Clarkson, J.J., Norup, M.V., Powell, M.P., Springate, D., Salamin, N. Baker, W.J. 2006b. Replying to: T.F. Stuessy Nature443: doi: (2006). Nature 443:E12 E13.
55. Schliewen, U.K., Tautz, D. Pääbo, S. 1994. Sympatric speciation suggested by monophyly of crater lake cichlids. Nature 368:629 632.
56. Schliewen, U.K., Kocher, T., McKaye, K.R., Seehausen, O. Tautz, D. 2006. Evidence for sympatric speciation Nature 444:E12 E13.
57. Schneider, K. Bürger, R. 2006. Does competitive divergence occur if assortative mating is costly J. Evol. Biol. 19:570 588.
58. Servedio, M.R. Noor, M.A.F. 2003. The role of reinforcement in speciation: theory and data. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34:339 364.
59. Stuessy, T.F. 2006. Sympatric speciation in islands Nature 443:E12.
60. Waxman, D. Gavrilets, S. 2005a. 20 questions on adaptive dynamics: a target review. J. Evol. Biol. 18:1139 1154.
61. Waxman, D. Gavrilets, S. 2005b. Issues of terminology, gradient dynamics and the ease of sympatric speciation in adaptive dynamics. J. Evol. Biol. 18:1214 1219.