Quality assurance of decision-making in conversations between professionals and non-professionals: identifying the presence of deliberative principles

Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 232-253

  Tveit, Anne Dorthe ^a   Walseth, Liv Tveit ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AGDER   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

Author keywords

decision making; deliberation; doctor patient communication; instrument; professional conversations; quality assurance; teacher parent communication

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864651860     PISSN: 15017419     EISSN: 17453011     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15017419.2011.574832     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Ackerman, B. and Fishkin, J.S. 2002. Deliberation day. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 10(2): 129-52.
2. Anderson, H. 2003. Samtale, sprog og terapi-et postmoderne perspektiv [Conversation, language and possibilities]. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag. Aristoteles 350 BCE/1934. The Nicomachean ethics 19. New and rev. ed. London: Heinemann.
3. Barnes, M. 2002. Bringing difference into deliberation? Disabled people, survivors and local governance. The Policy Press, 30(3): 319-31.
4. Braddock, C.H., Edwards, K.A., Hasenberg, N.M., Laidley, T.L. and Levinson, W. 1999. Informed decision making in outpatient practice. Time to get back to basics. JAMA, 282: 2313-20.
5. Bråten, S. 1998. Kommunikasjon og samspill: Fra fødsel til alderdom [Communication and interaction: From birth to old age], Oslo: Tano Aschehoug.
6. Bråten, S. 2007. On cirkular re-enactment of care and abuse, and on other-centered moments in psychotherapy. In On being moved: From mirror neurons to empathy, S. Bråten, 303-14. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
7. Chambers, S. 1996. Reasonable democracy. Jürgen Habermas and the politics of discourse, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
8. Chambers, S. 2003. Deliberative democratic theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 6: 307-26.
9. Ciccetti, D. 1984. On a model for assessing the security of infantile attachment: Issues of reliability and validity. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 7(1): 149-50.
10. Cohen, J. 1961. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20: 37-45.
11. Dahlberg, L. 2001. Extending the public sphere through cyberspace: The case of Minnesota e-democracy. First Monday 6, no. 3. http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/838/747.
12. Education Act. 1998. Act relating to primary and secondary education. Oslo: Ministry of Education and Research.
13. Eekelaar, J. 2006. Family law and personal life, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Efraimsson, E., Sandman, P.-O., Hydén, L.-C. and Rasmussen, B.H. 2004. Discharge planning: "Fooling ourselves?" -patient participation in conferences. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 13(5): 562-70.
15. Efraimsson, E., Sandman, P.-O., Hydén, L.-C. and Rasmussen, B.H. 2006. How to get one's voice heard: The problems of the discharge planning conference. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 53(6): 646-55.
16. Emanuel, E.J. and Emanuel, L.L. 1992. Four models of the physician-patient relationship. JAMA, 267(16): 2221-26.
17. Englund, T. 2006. Deliberative communication: A pragmatist proposal. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(5): 503-20.
18. European Academy of Teachers in General Practice. 2005. The European definitions of general practice/family medicine: Family Medicine Website. http://www.euract.org/index.php?folder_id=25.
19. Graham, T. and Witschge, T. 2003. In search of online deliberation: Towards a new method for examining the quality of online discussions. Communications, 28: 173-204.
20. Greenhalgh, T., Robb, N. and Scambler, G. 2006. Communicative and strategic action in interpreted consultations in primary health care: A Habermasian perspective. Social Science & Medicine, 63(5): 1170-87.
21. Habermas, J. 1984. The theory of communicative action. Reason and the rationalization of society, Boston: Beacon Press.
22. Habermas, J. 1987. The theory of communicative action. Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason, Boston: Beacon Press.
23. Habermas, J. 1996. Between facts and norms. Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Habermas, J. 1998. Some further clarifications of the concept of communicative rationality. In On the pragmatics of communication, M. Cooke, 307-42. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Hagemann, C. 2002. Participation in and contents of two Dutch political party discussion lists on the internet. Javnost, 9(2): 61-76.
26. Hutchby, I. and O'Reilly, M. 2010. Children's participation and the familial moral order in family therapy. Discourse Studies, 12(1): 49-64.
27. Karlsson, K. and Hydén, L.-C. 2007. Democracy in talk: Dominance in "user-centred" team meetings. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 9(2): 91-111.
28. Kazdin, A.E. 1982. Single-case research designs. Methods for clinical and applied settings, New York: Oxford University Press.
29. Linell, P., Gustavsson, L. and Juvonen, P. 1988. Interactional dominance in dyadic communication: A presentation of initiative-response analysis. Linguistics, 26: 415-42.
30. Linell, P., and T. Luckmann. 1991. Asymmetries in dialogue: Some conceptual preliminaries. In Asymmetries in dialogue, I. Marková and K. Foppa. Hempstead, MD: Harvester Wheatsheaf, Barnes & Noble Books.
31. Lipsky, M. 1980. Street-level bureaucracy. Dilemmas of the individual in public services, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
32. Lundeby, H. and Tøssebro, J. 2008. Exploring the experiences of "not being listened to" from the perspective of parents with disabled children. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 10(4): 258-74.
33. Marková, I. 1991. "Asymmetries in group conversations between a tutor and people with learning disabilities". In Asymmetries in dialogue, Edited by: Marková, I. and Foppa, K. Hempstead, MD: Harvester Wheatsheaf, Barnes & Noble Books.
34. Mcwhinney, I.R. 1997. Textbook of family medicine, 2nd ed, New York: Oxford University Press.
35. Ministry of Education and Research. 2006. Knowledge promotion. Oslo: Ministry of Education and Research.
36. Mishler, E.G. 1984. The discourse of medicine: Dialectics of medical interviews, Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
37. Muhlberger, P. 2006. Report to deliberative democracy consortium: Building a deliberation measurement toolbox. Version 1.0.http://www.deliberative-democracy.net/index.php?option=com_docman&task=search_result&Itemid=92.
38. Muller-Engelmann, M., T. Krones, H. Keller, and N. Donner-Banzhoff. 2008. Decision making preferences in the medical encounter-a factorial survey design. BMC Health Services Research 8: 260. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-8-260.
39. Nordahl, T. 2000. Samarbeid mellom hjem og skole: En kartleggingsundersøkelse. [Cooperation between home and school: A mapping survey]. Oslo: NOVA rapport 8/00.
40. Nordahl, T. 2003. Makt og avmakt i samarbeidet mellom hjem og skole. En evaluering innenfor reform 97. Oslo: Norsk institutt for forskning om oppvekst, velferd og aldring (NOVA).
41. Pellizzoni, L. 2001. The myth of the best argument: Power, deliberation and reason. British Journal of Sociology, 52(1): 59-86.
42. Report to the Parliament Number 21. 1998-99. Responsibility and mastering. Towards a general rehabilitation politics. In Norwegian: Ansvar og meistring. Mot ein heilskapleg rehabiliteringspolitikk. Oslo: Ministry of Health and Care Services.
43. Report to the Parliament Number 30. 2003-4. Culture for learning. In Norwegian: Kultur for læring. Oslo: Ministry of Education and Research.
44. Report to the Parliament Number 31. 2007-8. Quality in school. In Norwegian: Kvalitet i skolen: Oslo: Ministry of Education and Research.
45. Roter, D. 2006. The roter method of interaction analysis. Baltimore, MD. http://www.rias.org (accessed 7 February 2008).
46. Roter, D. and Larson, S. 2002. The roter interaction analysis system (rias): Utili and flexibility for analysis of medical interactions. Patient Education and Counseling, 46: 243-51.
47. Schei, E. 2006. Doctoring as leadership. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 3: 393-406.
48. Schön, D.A. 1995. The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action, Aldershot: Arena.
49. Seikkula, J. 1996. Öppna samtal [Open conversations]. Stockholm: Mareld. (Orig. pub. Sosiaaliset verkostot.)
50. Söder, M. 2009. Tensions, perspectives and themes in disability studies. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 11(2): 67-81.
51. Steenbergen, M.R., A. Bächtiger, M. Spörndli, and J. Steiner. 2003. Measuring political deliberation: A discourse quality index. Comparative European Politics, no. 1: 21-48.
52. Steiner, J. 2004. Deliberative politics in action analyzing parliamentary discourse. Theories of institutional design, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53. Stern, D.N. 2004. Her og nå. Øyeblikkets betydning i psykoterapi og hverdagsliv [The present moment in psychotherapy and everyday life], Oslo: Abstrakt forlag.
54. Trénel, M. 2004. Measuring the deliberativeness of online discussions. Coding scheme 2.4. Unpublished paper, October 18.
55. Tveit, A.D. 2009a. Conflict between truthfulness and tact in parent-teacher conferences. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 11(4): 237-56.
56. Tveit, A.D. 2009b. A parental voice: Parents as equal and dependent-rhetoric about parents, teachers, and their conversations. Educational Review, 61(3): 289-300.
57. Tveit, A.D. 2010. Challenging and dilemmatic dialogues. A study of conversations between teacher(s) and parents. PhD diss., Oslo, Faculty of Education, University of Oslo.
58. Vågan, A., and H. Grimen. 2008. Profesjoner i maktteoretisk perspektiv. In Profesjonsstudier, A. Molander and L. Terum, 411-28. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
59. Walseth, L.T., E. Abildsnes, and E. Schei. 2010. Lifestyle, health and the ethics of good living. Health behaviour counselling in general practice. Patient Education and Counseling, June 19. [Epub ahead of print].
60. Walseth, L.T., and E. Schei. 2010. Effecting change through dialogue: Habermas' theory of communicative action as a tool in medical lifestyle interventions. Medicine Health Care and Philosophy, June 15. [Epub ahead of print].
61. Wayne, V. 2003. A moral framework for multicultural education in health care. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 24(4): 301-28.
62. White, M.T. 1998. Decision-making through dialogue: Reconfiguring autonomy in genetic counseling. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 19(1): 5-19.
63. White, D.B., Braddock, C.H., Bereknyei, S. and Curtis, R.J. 2007. Toward shared decision making at the end of life in intensive care units. Opportunities for improvement. Archives of Internal Medicine, 167: 461-67.