Decision making preferences in the medical encounter - A factorial survey design

BMC Health Services Research

Volumn 8, Issue , 2008, Pages

  Müller Engelmann, Meike ^a   Krones, Tanja ^a   Keller, Heidi ^a   Donner Banzhoff, Norbert ^a  

^a PHILIPPS UNIVERSITY MARBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; GENERAL PRACTICE; GERMANY; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; PATIENT; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF HELP;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FAMILY PRACTICE; GERMANY; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENTS; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SELF-HELP GROUPS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 62449287328     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726963     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-260     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Systematic review of the effects of shared decision-making on patient satisfaction, treatment adherence and health status. EA Joosten L DeFuentes-Merillas GH de Weert T Sensky CP van der Staak CA de Jong, Psychother Psychosom 2008 77 219 226 10.1159/000126073 18418028
2. [Shared decision making]. B Floer M Schnee J Bocken W Streich W Kunstmann J Isfort, Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2004 129 2343 2347 10.1055/s-2004-835265 15497102
3. Not all patients want to participate in decision making. A national study of public preferences. W Levinson A Kao A Kuby RA Thisted, J Gen Intern Med 2005 20 531 535 15987329 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.04101.x
4. Do patients want to participate in medical decision making? WM Strull B Lo G Charles, JAMA 1984 252 2990 2994 10.1001/jama.252.21.2990 6502860
5. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). C Charles A Gafni T Whelan, Soc Sci Med 1997 44 681 692 10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00221-3 9032835
6. Effect on health-related outcomes of interventions to alter the interaction between patients and practitioners: a systematic review of trials. SJ Griffin AL Kinmonth MW Veltman S Gillard J Grant M Stewart, Ann Fam Med 2004 2 595 608 15576546 10.1370/afm.142
7. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. AM O'Connor D Stacey D Rovner M Holmes-Rovner J Tetroe H Llewellyn-Thomas, Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001 CD001431 11686990
8. [Shared decision making: an overview of international research literature]. F Scheibler C Janssen H Pfaff, Soz Praventivmed 2003 48 11 23 12756885
9. M Stewart JB Brown WW Weston IR McWhinney C McWilliam TR Freeman, Patient-centered medicine: transforming the clinical method Abingdon: Radcliffe Med. Press 2003
10. Agency in health care. Examining patients' preferences for attributes of the doctor-patient relationship. S Vick A Scott, J Health Econ 1998 17 587 605 10.1016/S0167-6296(97)00035-0 10185513
11. Patient preferences for medical decision making: who really wants to participate? NK Arora CA McHorney, Med Care 2000 38 335 341 10.1097/00005650- 200003000-00010 10718358
12. Decision making during serious illness: what role do patients really want to play? LF Degner JA Sloan, J Clin Epidemiol 1992 45 941 950 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90110-9 1432023
13. Shared decision making in clinical medicine: past research and future directions. DL Frosch RM Kaplan, Am J Prev Med 1999 17 285 294 10.1016/S0749-3797(99)00097-5 10606197
14. Desire for information and involvement in treatment decisions: elderly cancer patients' preferences and their physicians' perceptions. EB Elkin SH Kim ES Casper DW Kissane D Schrag, J Clin Oncol 2007 25 5275 5280 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.1922 18024875
15. Patient-physician concordance: preferences, perceptions, and factors influencing the breast cancer surgical decision. NK Janz PA Wren LA Copeland JC Lowery SL Goldfarb EG Wilkins, J Clin Oncol 2004 22 3091 3098 10.1200/JCO.2004.09.069 15284259
16. Do patients wish to be involved in decision making in the consultation? A cross sectional survey with video vignettes. B McKinstry, BMJ 2000 321 867 871 11021866 10.1136/bmj.321.7265.867
17. What role do patients wish to play in treatment decision making? RB Deber N Kraetschmer J Irvine, Arch Intern Med 1996 156 1414 1420 10.1001/archinte. 156.13.1414 8678709
18. Patient participation in decision-making. E Guadagnoli P Ward, Soc Sci Med 1998 47 329 339 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00059-8 9681902
19. A new model of medical decisions: exploring the limits of shared decision making. SN Whitney, Med Decis Making 2003 23 275 280 10.1177/0272989X03256006 12926577
20. The factorial survey approach. An Introduction. HR Rossi AB Anderson, Measuring social judgments. The factorial survey approach Beverly Hills/London/New Deli: Sage Publications, Rossi PH, Nock SL, 1982 15 67
21. Factorial survey methods: A valuable but under-utillised resarch method in nursing research. W Lauder, Nursing Times Research 2002 7 35 43
22. Experimentelle Vignettendesigns in faktoriellen Surveys. PM Steiner C Atzmüller, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 2006 58 117 146 10.1007/s11575-006-0006-9
23. Factorial surveys:unsing vignettes to study professional judgement. BJ Taylor, Birtish Journal of Social Work 2005 36 1187 1207 10.1093/bjsw/bch345
24. Consumer preferences and willigness-to-pay for water related residences in non-urban settings - a vignette analysis. E Feitelson, Regional Studies 2008 26 49 68 10.1080/00343409212331346771
25. Wow much is too much? Popular definitions of alcohol abuse. LJ O'Brian HR Rossi RC Tessler, The factorial survey approach. An Introduction Beverly Hills/London/New Deli: Sage Publications, Rossi PH, Nock SL, 1982 235 252
26. Die Umzugsentscheidung von Paaren als Verhandlungsproblem. Eine quasiexperimentelle berprüfung des Bargainig-Modells. K Auspung M Abraham, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 2007 59 271 293 10.1007/s11577-007-0029-7
27. Nurses' judgements of self-neglect: a factorial survey. W Lauder PA Scott A Whyte, Int J Nurs Stud 2001 38 601 608 10.1016/S0020-7489(00)00108-5 11524106
28. Clinical decision making: recognition of confusion and application of restraints. R Ludwick, Orthop Nurs 1999 18 65 72 10223008
29. The factorial survey: an experimental method to replicate real world problems. R Ludwick RA Zeller, Nurs Res 2001 50 129 133 10.1097/00006199- 200103000-00009 11302293
30. What makes an error unacceptable? A factorial survey on the disclosure of medical errors. DL Schwappach CM Koeck, Int J Qual Health Care 2004 16 317 326 10.1093/intqhc/mzh058 15252006
31. Factors influencing preceptors' responses to medical errors: a factorial survey. KM Mazor MA Fischer HL Haley D Hatem HJ Rogers ME Quirk, Acad Med 2005 80 S88 S92 10.1097/00001888-200510001-00024 16199467
32. Physicians' decisions to prescribe benzodiazepines for nervousness and insomnia. RL Brown RL Brown LA Saunders CA Castelaz O Papasouliotis, J Gen Intern Med 1997 12 44 52 9034945 10.1007/s11606-006-0006-2
33. Der faktorielle Survey und die Messung von Normen. M Beck K-D Opp, Kölne Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 2001 52 283 306 10.1007/s11577-001-0040-3
34. Pretesting survey instruments: an overview of cognitive methods. D Collins, Qual Life Res 2003 12 229 238 10.1023/A:1023254226592 12769135
35. Zur Validität von Fragen in standardisierten Erhebungen. Ergebnisse des Einsatzes eines kognitiven Pretestinterviews. K Kurz P Prüfer M Rexroth, ZUMA-Nachrichten 1999 44 83 107
36. Cancer patients: their desire for information and participation in treatment decisions. HJ Sutherland HA Llewellyn-Thomas GA Lockwood DL Tritchler JE Till, J R Soc Med 1989 82 260 263 2754680
37. W Hussy, Denken und Problemlösen Stuttgart/Berlin/Köln: Kohlhammer 1998
38. Whom shall we welcome? Elite judgemnts of the criterai for the selection of Immigrants. G Jasso, American Sociological Review 1988 53 919 932 10.2307/2095900
39. Distributive justice and earned income. G Jasso HR Rossi, American Sociological Review 1977 42 639 651 10.2307/2094561
40. Experimental plans in factorial surveys: Random or quota design. H Dülmer, Sociological methods and research 2007 35 382 409 10.1177/0049124106292367
41. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. F Faul E Erdfelder AG Lang A Buchner, Behav Res Methods 2007 39 175 191 17695343
42. The analysis of factorial surveys. JJ Hox IGG Kreft PLJ Hermkens, Sociological methods and research 1991 19 493 509 10.1177/0049124191019004003