Research to reality: A process evaluation of a mini-grants program to disseminate evidence-based nutrition programs to rural churches and worksites

Journal of Public Health Management and Practice

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 431-439

  Honeycutt, Sally ^a   Carvalho, Michelle ^a   Glanz, Karen ^b   Daniel, Sandra D ^c   Kegler, Michelle C ^a  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c GEORGIA SOUTHWESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

dissemination; evaluation; evidence based programs; nutrition

Indexed keywords

ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL; AFRICAN AMERICAN; ARTICLE; CLERGY; COMMUNITY CARE; DIET; ECONOMICS; ETHNOLOGY; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; EXERCISE; FEMALE; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH PROMOTION; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERVIEW; LEADERSHIP; MALE; MASS COMMUNICATION; METHODOLOGY; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; POVERTY; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RELIGION; RURAL POPULATION; STATISTICS; UNITED STATES; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL; AFRICAN AMERICANS; CLERGY; COMMUNITY NETWORKS; DIET; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE; EXERCISE; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; GEORGIA; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH PLAN IMPLEMENTATION; HEALTH PROMOTION; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; LEADERSHIP; MALE; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH SERVICES; POVERTY; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; PROGRAM EVALUATION; RELIGION AND PSYCHOLOGY; RESEARCH SUPPORT AS TOPIC; RURAL POPULATION;

EID: 84864629502     PISSN: 10784659     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e31822d4c69     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Glasgow RE, Marcus AC, Bull SS, Wilson KM. Disseminating effective cancer screening interventions. Cancer. 2004;101(5)(suppl):1239-1250. (Pubitemid 39100417)
2. Green LW, Glasgow RE. Evaluating the relevance, generalization, and applicability of research: issues in external validation and translation methodology. Eval Health Prof. 2006;29(1):126-153. (Pubitemid 43797500)
3. Pentz MA. Form follows function: designs for prevention effectiveness and diffusion research. Prev Sci. 2004;5(1):23-29. (Pubitemid 39023961)
4. Pentz MA, Jasuja GK, Rohrbach LA, Sussman S, Bardo MT. Translation in tobacco and drug abuse prevention research. Eval Health Prof. 2006;29(2):246-271. (Pubitemid 43668045)
5. Wandersman A, Duffy J, Flaspohler P, et al. Bridging the gap between prevention research and practice: the interactive systems framework for dissemination and implementation. Am J Commun Psychol. 2008;41(3):171-181.
6. Collins C, Harshbarger C, Sawyer R, Hamdallah M. The diffusion of effective behavioral interventions project: development, implementation, and lessons learned. AIDS Educ Prev. 2006;18(4)(suppl A):5-20. (Pubitemid 44440943)
7. Ellis P, Robinson P, Ciliska D, et al. A systematic review of studies evaluating diffusion and dissemination of selected cancer control interventions. Health Psychol. 2005;24(5):488-500. (Pubitemid 41279064)
8. Elliott DS,Mihalic SF. Issues in disseminating and replicating effective prevention programs. Prev Sci. 2004;5(1):47-53. (Pubitemid 39023964)
9. Gyurcsik NC, Brittain DR. Partial examination of the public health impact of the People with Arthritis Can Exercise (PACE) program: reach, adoption, and maintenance. Public Health Nurs. 2006;23(6):516-522. (Pubitemid 44706002)
10. Hoelscher DM, Kelder SH, Murray N, Cribb PW, Conroy J, Parcel GS. Dissemination and adoption of the child and adolescent trial for cardiovascular health (CATCH): a case study in Texas. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2001;7(2):90-100.
11. Rohrbach LA, D'Onofrio CN, Backer TE, Montgomery SB. Diffusion of school-based substance abuse prevention programs. Am Behav Sci. 1996;39(7):919-934.
12. Harshbarger C, Simmons G, Coelho H, Sloop K, Collins C. An empirical assessment of implementation, adaptation, and tailoring: the evaluation of CDC's National Diffusion of VOICES/VOCES. AIDS Educ Prev. 2006;18(4)(suppl A):184-197. (Pubitemid 44440957)
13. Schoenwald SK, Sheidow AJ, Letourneau EJ, Liao JG. Transportability of multisystemic therapy: evidence for multilevel influences. Ment Health Serv Res. 2003;5(4):223-239. (Pubitemid 37483547)
14. Kelly JA, SomlaiAM, DiFranceiscoWJ, et al. Bridging the gap between the science and service of HIV prevention: transferring effective research-based HIV prevention interventions to community AIDS service providers. Am J Public Health. 2000;90(7):1082-1088. (Pubitemid 30445362)
15. Collie-Akers V, Schultz JA, Carson V, Fawcett SB, Ronan M. REACH 2010: Kansas City, Missouri: evaluating mobilization strategies with neighborhood and faith organizations to reduce risk for health disparities. Health Promot Pract. 2009;10:118S-127S.
16. Johnson H, Bobbitt-CookeM, Schwarz M, White D. Creative partnerships for community health improvement: a qualitative evaluation of the Healthy Carolinas community microgrant project. Health Promot Pract. 2006;7(2):162-169.
17. Glasser M, Holt N, Hall K, et al. Meeting the needs of rural populations through interdisciplinary partnerships. Fam Commun Health. 2003;26(3):230-245.
18. Hartwig KA, Bobbitt-Cooke M, Zaharek MM, Nappi S, Wykoff RF, Katz DL. The value of microgrants for community-based health promotion: two models for practice and policy. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2006;12(1):90-96. (Pubitemid 44132849)
19. HartwigKA, Dunville RL,Kim MH, et al. Promoting Healthy People 2010 through small grants. Health Promot Pract. 2009;10(1):24-33.
20. Johnson DB, Smith LT, Bruemmer B. Small-grants programs: lessons from community-based approaches to changing nutrition environments. J Am Diet Assoc. 2007;107:301-305. (Pubitemid 46136127)
21. Paine-Andrews A, Francisco VT, Fawcett SB. Assessing community health concerns and implementing a microgrant program for self-help initiatives. Am J Public Health. 1994;84(2):316-318.
22. Wynn TA, Johnson RE, Fouad M, et al.Addressing disparitiesthrough coalition building: Alabama REACH 2010 lessons learned. J Health Care Poor Under. 2006;17:55-77. (Pubitemid 43873454)
23. Deacon Z, Foster-Fishman P, Mahaffey M, Archer G. Moving from preconditions for action to developing a cycle of continued social change: tapping the potential of mini-grant programs. J Commun Psychol. 2009;37(2):148-155.
24. Resnicow K, Campbell MK, Carr C, et al. Body and soul.-Rfaut dietary intervention conducted through African-American churches [see comment]. Am J Prev Med. 2004;27(2):97-105. (Pubitemid 38942938)
25. Campbell M, Resnicow K, Carr C, Wang T, Williams A. Process evaluation of an effective church-baseddiet intervention: body & soul. Health Educ Behav. 2007;34(6):864-880.
26. Hunt MK, Lederman R, Stoddard A, Potter S, Phillips J, Sorensen G. Process tracking results from the Treatwell 5-a- Day Worksite Study. Am J Health Promot. 2000;14(3):179-187. (Pubitemid 30106499)
27. Sorensen G, Hunt MK, Cohen N, et al. Worksite and family education for dietary change: the Treatwell 5-A-Day program. Health Educ Res. 1998;13(4):577-591. (Pubitemid 28562947)
28. Sorensen G, Stoddard A, Peterson K, et al. Increasing fruit and vegetable consumption through worksites and families in the Treatwell 5-a-Day study. Am J Public Health. 1999;89(1): 54-60. (Pubitemid 29281968)
29. Sorensen G, Stoddard AM, LaMontagne AD, et al. A comprehensive worksite cancer prevention intervention: behavior change results from a randomized controlled trail. Cancer Causes Control. 2002;13:493-502. (Pubitemid 34833100)
30. Eke AN, Neumann MS, Wilkes AL, Jones PL. Preparing effective behavioral interventions to be used by prevention providers: the role of researchers during HIV PreventionResearch Trials. AIDS Educ Prev. 2006;18(4)(suppl A): 44-58. (Pubitemid 44440946)
31. National Cancer Institute. Research Tested Intervention Programs 2008; Cancer Control PLANET. National Cancer Institute. .
32. Glasgow RE, Lichtenstein E, Marcus AC. Why don't we seemore translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to- effectiveness transition. Am J Public Health. 2003;93(8):1261-1267. (Pubitemid 38480188)
33. MilesM,HubermanA. QualitativeDataAnalysis:ASourcebook of New Methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publishing; 1994.
34. Patton M. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 3rd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2002.
35. Chinman M, Hannah G,Wandersman A, et al. Developing acommunity science research agenda for building communitycapacity for effective preventive interventions. Am J Commun Psychol. 2005;35(3/4):143-157. (Pubitemid 40684861)
36. Simpson DD. A conceptual framework for transferring research to practice. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2002;22(4):171-182. (Pubitemid 34606036)
37. Dusenbury L, Brannigan R, Falco M, Hansen WB. A review of research on fidelity of implementation: implications fordrug abuse prevention in school settings. Health Educ Res.2003;18(2):237-256. (Pubitemid 36457251)
38. Linnan L, Steckler A. Process evaluation for public health interventions and research: an overview. In: Steckler A, LinnanL, eds. Process Evaluation for Public Health Interventions and Research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2002:1-23.
39. Mowbray CT, Holter MC, Teague GB, Bybee D. Fidelity criteria:development, measurement, and validation. Am J Eval.2003;24(3):315-340. (Pubitemid 37272778)