Process tracking results from the treatwell 5-a-day worksite study

American Journal of Health Promotion

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 179-187

  Hunt, Mary K ^a   Lederman, Ruth ^a   Stoddard, Anne ^b   Potter, Steven ^a   Phillips, Judy ^a   Sorensen, Glorian ^c  

^a DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^c HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

5 a Day; Health promotion; Process tracking; Worksite

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOOD INTAKE; FRUIT; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH; VEGETABLE;

EID: 0033970639     PISSN: 08901171     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4278/0890-1171-14.3.179     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Dehar M, Casswell S, Duigan P. Formative and process evaluation of health promotion and disease prevention programs. Eval Rev 1993;17:204-20.
2. Scheirer MA. Implementation and process analysis. In: Johnson K, LaRosa JH, Scheirer CJ, Wolle JM, eds. Methodological Issues in Worksite Research. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, 1988.
3. Flay BR. Efficacy and effectiveness trials (and other phases of research) in the development of health promotion programs. Prev Med 1986;15:451-74.
4. Scheirer M, Shediac M, Cassady C. Measuring the implementation of health promotion programs: the case of the breast and cervical cancer program in Maryland. Health Educ Res 1995;10:11-25.
5. McGraw SA, McKinley SM, McClemments L, et al. Methods in program evaluation: the process evaluation systems of the Pawtucket Heart Health Program. Eval Rev 1989;13:459-83.
6. Scheirer MA, Griffith J. Studying micro-implementation empirically: lessons and dilemmas. In: Palumbo DJ, Calista DJ, eds. Implementation and the Policy Process: Opening Up the Black Box. New York, NY: Greenwood Press, 1990.
7. Sorensen G, Emmons K, Hunt M, Johnston D. Implications of the results of community intervention trials. Annu Rev Public Health 1998;19:379-416.
8. Koepsell TD, Diehr PH, Cheadle A, Kristal A. Invited commentary: symposium on community intervention trials. Am J Epidemiol 1995; 142:594-99.
9. Koepsell TD, Wagner EH, Cheadle DL, et al. Selected methodological issues in evaluating community-based health promotion and disease prevention programs. Annu Rev Public Health 1992;13:31-57.
10. Hunt M, Lederman R, Potter S, et al. Results of employee involvement in planning and implementing the Treatwell 5-a-Day Worksite Study. In press.
11. Havas S, Heimendinger J, Reynolds K, et al. 5-a-Day for Better Health: a new research initiative. J Am Diet Assoc 1994;94:32-6.
12. Sorensen G, Hunt M, Cohen N, et al. Worksite and family education for dietary change: the Treatwell 5-a-Day Program. Health Educ Res 1998;13:577-91.
13. Sorensen G, Stoddard A, Peterson K, et al. Increasing fruit and vegetable consumption through worksites and families in the Treat-well 5-a-Day Study. Am J Public Health 1999; 89:54-60.
14. Jacobs DR, Luepker RV, Mittlemark MB, et al. Community-wide prevention strategies: evaluation design of the Minnesotea Heart Health Program. J Chronic Dis 1986;39:775-88.
15. Subar AS, Heimendinger J, Krebs-Smith SM, et al. Fruit and vegetable intake in the United States: the baseline survey of the five-a-day for better health program. Am J Health Promot 1995; 9:352-360.
16. Serdula MK, Coates RJ, Byers T, et al. Fruit and vegetable intake among adults in 16 states: results of a brief telephone survey. Am J Public Health 1995;85:236-9.
17. Serdula M, Coates R, Byers T, et al. Evaluation of a breif telephone questionnaire to estimate fruit and vegetable consumption in diverse study populations. Epidemiology 1993;4: 455-63.
18. Minkler M, Wallerstein N. Improving health through community organization and community building. In: Glanz K LF, Rimer BK, ed. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1997.
19. Goodman R, Steckler A. Mobilizing communities for health enhancement: theories of organizational change. In: Glanz K, Lewis F, Rimer B, eds. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1997.
20. Sorensen G, Hsieh J, Hunt MK, et al. Employee advisory boards as a vehicle for organizing worksite health promotion programs. Am J Health Promotion 1992;6:443-64.
21. Green L, Richard L, Potrin L. Ecological foundations of health promotion. Am J Health Promotion 1996;10:270-81.
22. Stokols D, Allen J, Bellingham RL. The social ecology of health promotion: implications for research and practice. Am J Health Promotion 1996;10:247-51.
23. Schein E. Organizational Culture and Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1992.
24. Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations. New York: The Free Press, 1983.
25. Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1986.
26. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. J Consult Clin Psychol 1983;51:390-5.
27. Curry SJ, Kristal AR, Bowen DJ. An Application of the stage model of behavior change to dietary fat reduction. Health Educ Res 1992;7: 319-325.
28. Heaney C, Israel B. Social networks and social support. In: Glanz K, Lewis F, Rimer B, eds. Health Behavior and Health Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1997.
29. Vella J. Training Through Dialogue. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1995.
30. Lipsey M, Sechrest L, Perrin E, Bunker J. Theory as method: small theories of treatment. In: AHCPR Conference Proceedings, Research Methodology: Strengthening Causal Interpretations of Non-experimental Data. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, 1990. (DHHS Publication No. PHS 90-3454:33-51.)
31. Helitzer DL, Davis SM, Gittlesohn J, et al. Process evaluation in a multisite, primary obesity-prevention trial in American Indian schoolchildren. Am J Clin Nutr 1999;69: 816S-21S.
32. Goodman RM, Wheeler FC, Lee PR. Evaluation of the Heart To Heart Project: lessons from a community-based chronic disease prevention project. Am J Health Promotion 1995;9:443-55.
33. Jones ME, Bond ML, Mancini ME. Developing a culturally competent work force: an opportunity for collaboration. J Prof Nurs 1998;14:280-7.
34. Kaskutas LA, Weisner C, Caetano R. Predictors of help seeking among a longitudinal sample of the general population, 1984-1992. J Stud Alcohol 1997;58:155-61.
35. Perry CL, Sellers DE, Johnson C, et al. The Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovarscular Health (CATCH): intervention, implementation, and feasibility for elementary schools in the United States. Health Educ Behav 1997;24:716-35.
36. Dent C, Stacy A, Sussman S, et al. Implementation and process evaluation of a school-based drug abuse prevention program: project towards no drug abuse. J Drug Educ 1998;28:361-375.
37. Macaulay AC, Paradis G, Potvin L, et al. The Kahnawake Schools Diabetes Prevention Project: intervention, evaluation, and baseline results of a diabetes primary prevention program with a native community in Canada. Prev Med 1997;26:779-90.
38. Cabral RJ, Galavotti C, Gargiullo PM, et al. Paraprofessional delivery of a theory based hiv prevention counseling intervention for women. Public Health Rep 1996;3:75-82.
39. Ramirez AG, McAlister A, Gallion KJ, et al. Community level cancer control in a Texas barrio: part I - theoretical basis, implementation, and process evaluation. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1995;18:117-22.
40. Snyder P, Anliker J, Cunningham-Sabo L, et al. The Pathways study: a model for lowering the fat in school meals. Am J Clin Nutr 1999;69:810S-15S.