A comparison of adaptive and adaptable automation under different levels of environmental stress

Ergonomics

Volumn 55, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 840-853

  Sauer, Juergen ^a   Kao, Chung Shan ^a   Wastell, David ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FRIBOURG   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

adaptable automation; adaptive automation; performance; stress

Indexed keywords

ACTIVE SYSTEMS; ADAPTIVE AUTOMATION; ADAPTIVE CONTROL; AUTOMATED PROCESS CONTROL; AUTOMATED SYSTEMS; AUTOMATION CONTROLS; ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS; EVENT-BASED; NOISE EXPOSURE; PERFORMANCE;

NOISE POLLUTION; STRESSES;

AUTOMATION;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FATIGUE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAN MACHINE INTERACTION; MENTAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; NOISE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; TASK PERFORMANCE; WORKLOAD;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AUTOMATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FATIGUE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAN-MACHINE SYSTEMS; NOISE; STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; WORKLOAD;

EID: 84864535125     PISSN: 00140139     EISSN: 13665847     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2012.676673     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Brookhuis, K. A., De Waard, D. and Fairclough, S. H. 2003. Criteria for driver impairment. Ergonomics, 46(5): 433-445.
2. Endsley, M. R. and Kaber, D. B. 1999. Level of automation effects on performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. Ergonomics, 42(3): 462-492.
3. Funke, G. and Matthews, G., Warm, J.S., and Emo, A.K. 2007. Vehicle automation: a remedy for driver stress?. Ergonomics, 50(8): 1302-1323.
4. Hart, S. G. and Staveland, L. E. 1988. "Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research". In Human mental workload, Edited by: Hancock, P. A. and Meshkati, N. 139-183. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
5. Hockey, G. R.J. 1997. Compensatory control in the regulation of human performance under stress and high workload: a cognitive energetical framework. Biological Psychology, 45(1-3): 73-93.
6. Hockey, G. R.J., Wastell, D. G. and Sauer, J. 1998. Effects of sleep deprivation and user-interface on complex performance: a multilevel analysis of compensatory control. Human Factors, 40(2): 233-253.
7. Hockey, G. R.J., Sauer, J. and Wastell, D. G. 2007. Adaptability of training in simulated process control: knowledge- versus rule-based guidance under task changes and environmental stress. Human Factors, 49(1): 158-174.
8. Hockey, G. R.J. and Nickel, P., Roberts, A.C., and Roberts, M.H. 2009. Sensitivity of candidate markers of psychophysiological strain to cyclical changes in manual control load during simulated process control. Applied Ergonomics, 40(6): 1011-1018.
9. Inagaki, T. 2003. "Adaptive automation: sharing and trading of control". In Handbook of cognitive task design, Edited by: Hollnagel, E. 147-169. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10. Kaber, D. B. and Wright, M.C., Prinzel, L.J., and Clamann, M.P. 2005. Adaptive automation of human-machine system information-processing functions. Human Factors, 47(4): 730-741.
11. Kaber, D. B. and Perry, C.M., Segall, N., McClernon, C.K., and Prinzel, L.J. 2006. Situation awareness implications of adaptive automation for information processing in an air traffic control-related task. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 36(5): 447-462.
12. Karasek, R. and Theorell, T. 1990. Healthy work: stress, productivity and the reconstruction of working life, New York: Basic Books.
13. Kontogiannis, T. 1996. Stress and operator decision making in coping with emergencies. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45: 75-104.
14. Lee, J. D. and Moray, N. 1994. Trust, self-confidence, and operators' adaptation to automation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 40(1): 153-184.
15. Lorenz, B. and Di Nocera, F., Röttger, S., and Parasuraman, R. 2002. Automated fault-management in a simulated spaceflight micro-world. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 73(9): 886-897.
16. Manzey, D. and Bleil, M., Bahner-Heyne, J.E., Klostermann, A., Onnasch, L., Reichenbach, J., and Röttger, S. 2008. AutoCAMS 2.0. Manual. Berichte aus dem Fachgebiet Arbeits-, Ingenieur- und Organisationspsychologie der TU Berlin [online] Available from: http://www.aio.tu-berlin.de/?id = 30492 [Accessed 29 June 2011]
17. Matthews, G. and Davies, D.R., Westerman, S.J., and Stammers, R.B. 2000. Human performance: cognition, stress and individual differences, London: Psychology Press.
18. Meyer-Bisch, C. 2005. Hypoacousie due au bruit: La réglementation évolue. Médecine et Sciences, 21(12): 1089-1095.
19. O'Donnell, R. D. and Eggemeier, F. T. 1986. "Workload assessment methodology". In Handbook of perception and human performance, Edited by: Boff, K. R., Kaufman, L. and Thomas, J. P. 42/1-42/49. Chichester: Wiley.
20. Parasuraman, R. 2000. Designing automation for human use: empirical studies and quantitative models. Ergonomics, 43(7): 931-951.
21. Parasuraman, R. and Wickens, C. D. 2008. Humans: still vital after all these years of automation. Human Factors, 50(3): 511-520.
22. Parasuraman, R. and Bahri, T., Deaton, J. E., Morrison, J.G., and Barnes, M. 1992. Theory and design of adaptive automation in aviation systems, Warminster, PA: Naval Air Development Center Aircraft Division, Progress Rep. No. NAWCADWAR-92033-60.
23. Parasuraman, R., Mouloua, M. and Molloy, R. 1996. Effects of adaptive task allocation on monitoring of automated systems. Human Factors, 38: 665-679.
24. Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T. B. and Wickens, C. D. 2000. A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A. Systems and Humans, 30: 286-297.
25. Parasuraman, R., Cosenzo, K. and de Visser, E. 2009. Adaptive automation for human supervision of multiple uninhabited vehicles: effects on change detection, situation awareness, and mental workload. Military Psychology, 21: 270-297.
26. Rice, S. and Keller, D. 2009. Automation reliance under time pressure. International Journal of Cognitive Technology, 14(1): 36-44.
27. Röttger, S., Bali, K. and Manzey, D. 2009. Impact of automated decision aids on performance, operator behaviour and workload in a simulated supervisory control task. Ergonomics, 52(5): 512-523.
28. Sauer, J. 2000. Prospective memory: a secondary task with promise. Applied Ergonomics, 31(2): 131-137.
29. Sauer, J. and Wastell, D., Hockey, G.R.J., and Earle, F. 2003. Performance in a complex multiple-task environment during a laboratory-based simulation of occasional night work. Human Factors, 45(4): 657-669.
30. Sauer, J., Kao, C.-S. and Wastell, D. 2011. Explicit control of adaptive automation under different levels of environmental stress. Ergonomics, 54(8): 755-766.
31. Sauer, J., Nickel, P. and Wastell, D. G. in press. Designing automation for complex work environments under different levels of stress. Applied Ergonomics,
32. Scerbo, M. 1996. "Theoretical perspectives on adaptive automation". In Automation and human performance: theory and applications, Edited by: Parasuraman, R. and Mouloua, M. 37-63. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Sheridan, T. B. and Verplank, W. L. 1978. Human and computer control of undersea teleoperators, Arlington, VA: Office of Naval Research.
34. Tattersall, A. J. and Hockey, G. R.J. 2008. "Demanding work, technology, and human performance". In Introduction to work and organizational psychology: a European perspective, Edited by: Chmiel, N. 169-189. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
35. Udris, I. and Frese, M. 1988. "Belastung, Stress, Beanspruchung und ihre Folgen". In Angewandte Psychologie-ein Lehrbuch, Edited by: Frey, D., Graf Hoyos, C. and Stahlberg, D. 427-447. Munich: Psychologie Verlags Union.
36. Wickens, C. D. and Hollands, J. G. 2000. Engineering psychology and human performance, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.