Explicit control of adaptive automation under different levels of environmental stress

Ergonomics

Volumn 54, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 755-766

  Sauer, Jürgen ^a   Kao, Chung Shan ^a   Wastell, David ^b   Nickel, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FRIBOURG   (Switzerland)

^b NOTTINGHAM UNIVERSITY BUSINESS SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Adaptive automation; Explicit allocation of function; Performance; Stress

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE AUTOMATION; AUTOMATION DESIGN; CONTROL ENVIRONMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS; EXPLICIT ALLOCATION OF FUNCTION; LEVELS OF AUTOMATION; MEASURES OF PERFORMANCE; NOISE EXPOSURE; OPERATOR SUPPORT; PERFORMANCE; TESTING SESSIONS; WORK-RELATED; WORKING CONDITIONS;

NOISE POLLUTION;

AUTOMATION;

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MAN MACHINE INTERACTION; MENTAL STRESS; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; AUTOMATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MAN-MACHINE SYSTEMS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80051727494     PISSN: 00140139     EISSN: 13665847     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2011.592606     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Barling, J., Kelloway, E.K., and Frone, M.R., 2005. Interventions. In: J. Barling, E.K. Kelloway, and M.R. Frone, eds. Handbook of work stress. London: Sage Publications, 601-607.
2. Boucsein, W. and Backs, R.W., 2000. Engineering psychophysiology as a discipline: historical and theoretical aspects. In: R.W. Backs and W. Boucsein, eds. Engineering psychophysiology issues and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 3-30.
3. Endsley, M.R. and Kiris, E.O., 1995. The out-of-the-loop performance problem and level of control in automation. Human Factors, 37 (2), 381-394.
4. Harris, W.C., Hancock, P.A., and Arthur, E.J., 1993. The effect of taskload projection on automation use, performance, and workload. International symposium on Aviation Psychology, 7th, 26-29 April 1993. Columbus, OH, Ohio State University Press. 890a-890f.
5. Harris, W.C., et al., 1994. Performance, workload, and fatigue changes associated with automation. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 5 (2), 169-185.
6. Hart, S.G. and Staveland, L.E., 1988. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In: P.A. Hancock and N. Meshkati, eds. Human mental workload. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 139-183.
7. Hockey, G.R.J., 1970. Signal probability and spatial location as possible bases for increased selectivity in noise. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 22, 37-42.
8. Hockey, G.R.J., 1986. Changes in operator efficiency as a function of environmental stress, fatigue, and circadian rhythms. In: K.R. Boff, L. Kaufmann, and J.P. Thomas, eds. Handbook of perception and human performance. Chichester: Wiley, 44.1-44.49.
9. Hockey, G.R.J., 1997. Compensatory control in the regulation of human performance under stress and high workload: a cognitive energetical framework. Biological Psychology, 45, 73-93.
10. Hockey, G.R.J. and Maule, A.J., 1995. Unscheduled manual interventions in automated process control. Ergonomics, 38, 2504-2524.
11. Hockey, G.R.J., Sauer, J., and Wastell, D.G., 2007. Adaptability of training in simulated process control: knowledge- versus rule-based guidance under task changes and environmental stress. Human Factors, 49, 158-174.
12. Hockey, G.R.J., Wastell, D.G., and Sauer, J., 1998. Effects of sleep deprivation and user-interface on complex performance: a multilevel analysis of compensatory control. Human Factors, 40, 233-253.
13. Hockey, G.R.J., et al., 2009. Sensitivity of candidate markers of psychophysiological strain to cyclical changes in manual control load during simulated process control. Applied Ergonomics, 40 (6), 1011-1018.
14. Inagaki, T., 2003. Adaptive automation: sharing and trading of control. In: E. Hollnagel, ed. Handbook of cognitive task design. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 147-169.
15. Kaber, D.B. and Endsley, M.R., 2004. The effects of level of automation and adaptive automation on human performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 5, 113-153.
16. Kaber, D.B. and Riley, J.M., 1999. Adaptive automation of a dynamic control task based on secondary task workload measurement. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 3, 169-187.
17. Kaber, D.B., et al., 2005. Adaptive automation of humanmachine system information-processing functions. Human Factors, 47 (4), 730-741.
18. Karasek, R. and Theorell, T., 1990. Healthy work: Stress, productivity and the reconstruction of working life. New York: Basic Books.
19. Kettunen, J. and Keltikangas-Järvinen, L., 2001. Intraindividual analysis of instantaneous heart rate variability. Psychophysiology, 38 (4), 659-668.
20. Kudat, H., et al., 2006. Heart rate variability in diabetes patients. The Journal of International Medical Research, 34, 291-296.
21. Lorenz, B., et al., 2002. Automated fault-management in a simulated spaceflight micro-world. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 73, 886-897.
22. Manzey, D., et al., 2008. AutoCAMS 2.0. Manual. Berichte aus dem Fachgebiet Arbeits-, Ingenieur- und Organisationspsychologie der TU Berlin [online]. Available from: http://www.aio.tu-berlin.de/?id=30492 [Accessed 29th June 2011].
23. Matthews, G., et al., 2000. Human performance: Cognition, stress and individual differences. London: Psychology Press.
24. Metzger, U. and Parasuraman, R., 2005. Automation in future air traffic management: effects of decision aid reliability on controller performance and mental workload. Human Factors, 47 (1), 35-49.
25. Meyer-Bisch, C., 2005. Hypoacousie due au bruit: la réglementation évolue. Médecine et Sciences, 21 (12), 1089-1095.
26. Nickel, P. and Nachreiner, F., 2003. Sensitivity and diagnosticity of the 0.1 Hz component of heart rate variability as an indicator of mental workload. Human Factors, 45, 575-590.
27. O'Donnell, R.D. and Eggemeier, F.T., 1986. Workload assessment methodology. In: K.R. Boff, L. Kaufman, and J.P. Thomas, eds. Handbook of perception and human performance. Chichester: Wiley.
28. Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T.B., and Wickens, C.D., 2000. A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A. Systems and Humans, 30, 286-297.
29. Parasuraman, R. and Wickens, C.D., 2008. Humans: still vital after all these years of automation. Human Factors, 50 (3), 511-520.
30. Röttger, S., Bali, K., and Manzey, D., 2009. Impact of automated decision aids on performance, operator behaviour and workload in a simulated supervisory control task. Ergonomics, 52 (5), 512-523.
31. Sauer, J., Nickel, P., and Wastell, D., 2011. Designing automation for complex work environments under different levels of stress. Manuscript submitted for publication.
32. Semmer, N.K. and Udris, I., 2007. Bedeutung und Wirkung von Arbeit. In: H. Schuler, ed. Organisationspsychologie. Bern: Huber, 157-195.
33. Sheridan, T.B. and Verplank, W.L., 1978. Human and computer control of undersea teleoperators. Arlington: Office of Naval Research.
34. Tattersall, A.J. and Fairclough, S.H., 2003. Adaptive automation and modes of control. In: G.R.J. Hockey, A.W.K. Gaillard, and O. Burov, eds. Operator functional state: The assessment and prediction of human performance degradation in complex tasks. Amsterdam: ISO Press, 238-248.
35. Tattersall, A.J. and Hockey, G.R.J., 2008. Demanding work, technology, and human performance. In: N. Chmiel, ed. Introduction to work and organizational psychology: A European perspective. Malden Mass: Blackwell, 169-189.
36. Wickens, C.D. and Hollands, J.G., 2000. Engineering psychology and human performance. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.