Coalition or derogation? How perceived discrimination influences intraminority intergroup relations

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Volumn 102, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 759-777

  Craig, Maureen A ^a   Richeson, Jennifer A ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Intergroup dynamics; Interracial attitudes; Minority groups; Perceived discrimination; Prejudice

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AFRICAN AMERICAN; ARTICLE; ASIAN AMERICAN; ATTITUDE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ETHNOLOGY; FEMALE; GROUP PROCESS; HISPANIC; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; MINORITY GROUP; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;

ADULT; AFRICAN AMERICANS; ASIAN AMERICANS; ATTITUDE; DATA COLLECTION; FEMALE; GROUP PROCESSES; HISPANIC AMERICANS; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MINORITY GROUPS; PREJUDICE; PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SOCIAL IDENTIFICATION; SOCIAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84864498055     PISSN: 00223514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0026481     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596-612. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596
2. Branscombe, N. R., Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1999). The context and content of social identity threat. In N. Ellemers, K. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 35-58). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
3. Branscombe, N. R., Schmitt, M. T., & Harvey, R. D. (1999). Perceiving pervasive discrimination among African Americans: Implications for group identification and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 135-149. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.1.135
4. Branscombe, N. R., & Wann, D. L. (1994). Collective self-esteem consequences of outgroup derogation when a valued social identity is on trial. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 641-657. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420240603
5. Brewer, M. B. (2000). Reducing prejudice through cross-categorization: Effects of multiple social identities. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 165-183). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Cadinu, M., & Reggiori, C. (2002). Discrimination of a low-status outgroup: The role of ingroup threat. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 501-515. doi:10.1002/ejsp.105
7. Calderon, J. (1992). "Hispanic" and "Latino": The viability of categories for panethnic unity. Latin American Perspectives, 19, 37-44. doi: 10.1177/0094582X9201900404
8. Conover, P. J. (1984). The influence of group identifications on political perception and evaluation. Journal of Politics, 46, 760-785. doi: 10.2307/2130855
9. Craig, M. A., DeHart, T., Richeson, J. A., & Fiedorowicz, L. (2011). Do unto others as others have done unto you? Perceiving sexism influences women's evaluations of stigmatized racial groups. Unpublished manuscript.
10. Crosby, F. (1982). Relative deprivation and working women. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
11. Cunningham, G. B. (2005). The importance of a common in-group identity in ethnically diverse groups. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 9, 251-260. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.9.4.251
12. Dawson, M. (1994). Behind the mule: Race and class in African-American politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13. Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878
14. Fraga, L. R., Garcia, J. A., Hero, R., Jones-Correa, M., Martinez-Ebers, V., & Segura, G. M. (2006). Latino National Survey (LNS) [Data file and code book]. Retrieved from doi:10.3886/ICPSR20862
15. Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
16. Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Anastasio, P. A., Bachman, B. A., & Rust, M. C. (1993). The common ingroup identity model: Recategorization and the reduction of intergroup bias. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 1-26). New York, NY: Wiley.
17. Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., & Bachman, B. A. (1996). Revisiting the contact hypothesis: The induction of a common ingroup identity. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 20, 271-290. doi:10.1016/0147-1767(96)00019-3
18. Gaertner, S. L., Rust, M. C., Dovidio, J. F., Bachman, B. A., & Anastasio, P. A. (1994). The contact hypothesis: The role of a common ingroup identity on reducing intergroup bias. Small Group Research, 25, 224-249. doi:10.1177/1046496494252005
19. Galanis, C. M. B., & Jones, E. E. (1986). When stigma confronts stigma: Some conditions enhancing a victim's tolerance of other victims. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12, 169-177. doi:10.1177/0146167286122003
20. Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 692-731. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.692
21. Gay, C. (2006). Seeing difference: The effect of economic disparity on Black attitudes toward Latinos. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 982-997. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00228.x
22. Glasford, D. E., & Dovidio, J. F. (2011). E pluribus unum: Dual identity and minority group members' motivation to engage in contact, as well as social change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 1021-1024. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.03.021
23. Graubard, B. I., & Korn, E. L. (1996). Survey inference for subpopulations. American Journal of Epidemiology, 144, 102-106.
24. Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464
25. Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197-216. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197
26. Gurin, P. (1985). Women's gender consciousness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 49, 143-163. doi:10.1086/268911
27. Gurin, P., Miller, A. H., & Gurin, G. (1980). Stratum identification and consciousness. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43, 30-47. doi:10.2307/3033746
28. Hewstone, M. (1996). Contact and categorization: Social psychological interventions to change intergroup relations. In N. Macrae, M. Hewstone, & C. Stangor (Eds.), Foundations of stereotypes and stereotyping (pp. 323-368). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
29. Hofmann, W., Gawronski, B., Gschwendner, T., Le, H., & Schmitt, M. (2005). A meta-analysis on the correlation between the Implicit Association Test and explicit self-report measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1369-1385. doi:10.1177/0146167205275613
30. Hornsey, M. J. (2008). Social identity theory and self-categorization theory: A historical review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 204-222. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00066.x
31. Horton, J. (1992). The politics of diversity in Monterey Park, California. In L. Lamphere (Ed.), Structuring diversity: Ethnographic perspectives on the new immigration (pp. 215-246). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
32. Jackson, J. S., Hutchings, V. L., Brown, R., & Wong, C. (2004). National Politics Study [Data file and code book]. Retrieved from doi:10.3886/ICPSR24483
33. Kaiser, C. R., & Miller, C. T. (2001). Reacting to impending discrimination: Compensation for prejudice and attributions of discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1357-1367. doi: 10.1177/01461672012710011
34. Kaiser, C. R., Vick, S. B., & Major, B. (2006). Prejudice expectations moderate preconscious attention to cues that are threatening to social identity. Psychological Science, 17, 332-338. doi:10.1111/j.14679280.2006.01707.x
35. Kasschau, P. L. (1977). Age and race discrimination reported by middleaged and older persons. Social Forces, 55, 728-742.
36. Katz, I., & Hass, R. G. (1988). Racial ambivalence and American value conflict: Correlational and priming studies of dual cognitive structures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 893-905. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.55.6.893
37. Leach, C. W., Spears, R., Branscombe, N. R., & Doosje, B. (2003). Malicious pleasure: Schadenfreude at the suffering of another group. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 932-943. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.5.932
38. Levin, S., Sinclair, S., Sidanius, J., & Van Laar, C. (2009). Ethnic and university identities across the college years: A common in-group identity perspective. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 287-306. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01601.x
39. Lowery, B. S., Knowles, E. D., & Unzueta, M. M. (2007). Framing inequity safely: Whites' motivated perceptions of racial privilege. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1237-1250. doi:10.1177/0146167207303016
40. Major, B., Kaiser, C. R., O'Brien, L. T., & McCoy, S. K. (2007). Perceived discrimination as worldview threat or worldview confirmation: Implications for self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 1068-1086. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1068
41. McClain, P. D., & Karnig, A. K. (1990). Black and Latino socioeconomic and political competition. American Political Science Review, 84, 535-545. doi:10.2307/1963534
42. McClain, P. D., & Tauber, S. C. (1998). Black and Latino socioeconomic and political competition: Has a decade made a difference? American Politics Research, 26, 237-252. doi:10.1177/1532673X9802600206
43. McCoy, S. K., & Major, B. (2003). Group identification moderates emotional responses to perceived prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1005-1017. doi:10.1177/0146167203253466
44. National Science Foundation. (2009). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/pdf/nsf09305.pdf
45. Nier, J. A., Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Banker, B. S., Ward, C. M., & Rust, M. C. (2001). Changing interracial evaluations and behavior: The effects of a common group identity. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 4, 299-316. doi:10.1177/1368430201004004001
46. Okami, P. (1992). Intolerable grievances patiently endured: Referent cognitions and group conflict as mediators of anti-Jewish sentiment among African-Americans. Political Psychology, 13, 727-753. doi:10.2307/3791499
47. Operario, D., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). Ethnic identity moderates perceptions of prejudice: Judgments of personal versus group discrimination and subtle versus blatant bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 550-561. doi:10.1177/0146167201275004
48. Payne, B. K., Burkley, M. A., & Stokes, M. B. (2008). Why do implicit and explicit attitude tests diverge? The role of structural fit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 16-31. doi:10.1037/00223514.94.1.16
49. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717-731. doi:10.3758/BF03206553
50. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
51. Rothgerber, H., & Worchel, S. (1997). The view from below: Intergroup relations from the perspective of the disadvantaged group. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1191-1205. doi:10.1037/00223514.73.6.1191
52. Saguy, T., Tausch, N., Dovidio, J. F., & Pratto, F. (2009). The irony of harmony: Intergroup contact can produce false expectations for equality. Psychological Science, 20, 114-121. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280 .2008.02261.x
53. Schmitt, M. T., Spears, R., & Branscombe, N. R. (2003). Constructing a minority group identity out of shared rejection: The case of international students. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1-12. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.131
54. Sellers, R. M., Rowley, S. A. J., Chavous, T. M., Shelton, J. N., & Smith, M. (1997). Multidimensional inventory of Black identity: Preliminary investigation of reliability and construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 805-815. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.4.805
55. Sellers, R. M., & Shelton, J. N. (2003). The role of racial identity in perceived racial discrimination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1079-1092. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.5.1079
56. Shapiro, J. R., & Neuberg, S. L. (2008). When do the stigmatized stigmatize? The ironic effects of being accountable to (perceived) majority group prejudice-expression norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 877-898. doi:10.1037/a0011617
57. Shelton, J. N. (2000). A reconceptualization of how we study issues of racial prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 374-390. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0404_6
58. Shelton, J. N., Richeson, J. A., & Salvatore, J. (2005). Expecting to be the target of prejudice: Implications for interethnic interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1189-1202. doi:10.1177/0146167205274894
59. Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797-811. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797
60. Swann, W. B., Gómez, Á., Seyle, D. C., Morales, J. F., & Huici, C. (2009). Identity fusion: The interplay of personal and social identities in extreme group behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 995-1011. doi:10.1037/a0013668
61. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
62. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & L. W. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
63. Taylor, D. M., Wright, S. C., Moghaddam, F. M., & Lalonde, R. N. (1990). The personal-group discrimination discrepancy: Perceiving my group, but not myself, to be a target for discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 254-262. doi:10.1177/0146167290162006
64. Tropp, L., & Wright, S. C. (2001). Ingroup identification as the inclusion of ingroup in the self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 585-600. doi:10.1177/0146167201275007
65. U.S. Census Bureau. (2009). 2009 national population projections (supplemental). Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/population/www/projections/2009projections.html
66. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. (2006). Protecting the health of minority communities. Retrieved from http://www.hhs.gov/news/factsheet/minorityhealth.html
67. van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 504-535. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504
68. Voci, A. (2006). The link between identification and in-group favouritism: Effects of threat to social identity and trust-related emotions. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 265-284. doi:10.1348/014466605X52245
69. White, J. B., & Langer, E. J. (1999). Horizontal hostility: Relations between similar minority groups. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 537-559.doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00132
70. Yen, H. (2010, March). Minority babies set to become majority in 2010.Retrieved from http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/35793316/ns/us_newslife/t/minority-babies-set-become-majority/
71. Yen, H. (2011, June 23). Census shows whites lose US majority among babies, Associated Press. Retrieved from http://money.msn.com/business-news/article.aspx?feed=AP&Date=20110623&ID=13812653