The view from below: Intergroup relations from the perspective of the disadvantaged group

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Volumn 73, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 1191-1205

  Rothgerber, Hank ^a   Worchel, Stephen ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031324094     PISSN: 00223514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.73.6.1191     Document Type: Review

References (52)

1. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
2. Apfelbaum, E. (1979). Relations of domination and movements for liberation: An analysis of power between groups. In W. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 188-204). Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.
3. Bartsch, R. A., & Judd, C. M. (1993). Majority-minority status and perceived ingroup variability revisited. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 471-483.
4. Berman, P. (1994, February 28). The other and almost the same. The New Yorker, 61-70.
5. Brewer, M. B., & Silver, M. (1978). Ingroup bias as a function of task characteristics. European Journal of Social Psychology, 8, 393-400.
6. Brown, R. J. (1984). The role of similarity in intergroup relations. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), The social dimension (Vol. 2, pp. 603-623). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
7. Brown, R. J., & Smith, A. (1989). Perceptions of and by minority groups: The case of women in academia. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 61-75.
8. Byrne, D. (1969). Attitudes and attraction. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 36-89). New York: Academic Press.
9. Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press.
10. Chin, M. G., & McClintock, C. G. (1993). The effects of intergroup discrimination and social values on level of self-esteem in the minimal group paradigm. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 63-75.
11. Crocker, J., & Major, B. (1989). Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma. Psychological Review, 96, 608-630.
12. Crocker, J., Voelkl, K., Testa, M., & Major, B. (1991). Social stigma: The affective consequences of attributional ambiguity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 218-228.
13. Deutsch, M., & Krauss, R. (1960). The effect of threat upon interpersonal bargaining. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 61, 181-189.
14. Dion, K. L., Earn, B. M., & Yee, P. H. (1978). The experience of being a victim of prejudice: An experimental approach. International Journal of Psychology, 13, 197-214.
15. Doojse, B., & Ellemers, N. (1997). Stereotypes under threat: The role of group identification. In R. Spears, P. Oakes, N. Ellemers, & S. Haslam (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life: Emphasizing the side of group perceptions (pp. 257-272). London: Sage.
16. Duckitt, J. (1992). Psychology and prejudice: A historical analysis and integrative framework. American Psychologist, 47, 1182-1193.
17. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.
18. Finchilescu, G. (1986). Effect of incompatibility between internal and external group membership criteria on intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 16, 83-87.
19. Goethals, G. R., & Darley, J. M. (1987). Social comparison theory: Self-evaluation and group life. In B. Mullen & G. R. Goethals (Eds.), Theories of group behavior (pp. 21-47) New York: Springer-Verlag.
20. Hartstone, M., & Augoustinos, M. (1995). The minimal group paradigm: Categorization into two versus three groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 179-193.
21. Haslam, S. A., & Turner, J. C. (1992). Context-dependent variation in social stereotyping 2: The relationship between frame of reference, self-categorization and accentuation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 251-278.
22. Haslam, S. A., Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J., McGarty, C., & Hayes, B. K. (1992). Context-dependent variation in social stereotyping 1: The effects of intergroup relations as mediated by social change and frame of reference. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 3-20.
23. Hogg, M. A., & Sunderland, J. (1991). Self-esteem and intergroup discrimination in the minimal group paradigm. British Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 51-62.
24. Huddy, L., & Virtanen, S. (1995). Subgroup differentiation and subgroup bias among Latinos as a function of familiarity and positive distinctiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 97-108.
25. Katz, I., & Hass, R. G. (1988). Racial ambivalence and American value conflict: Correlational and priming studies of dual cognitive structures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 893-905.
26. Lemyre, L., & Smith, P. M. (1985). Intergroup discrimination and self-esteem in the minimal group paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 660-670.
27. Locksley, A., Ortiz, V., & Hepburn, C. (1980). Social categorization and discriminatory behavior: Extinguishing the minimal intergroup discrimination effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 773-783.
28. Moscovici, S. (1980). Toward a theory of conversion behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 209-239). New York: Academic Press.
29. Moscovici, S., & Nemeth, C. J. (1974). Minority influence. In C. J. Nemeth (Ed.), Social psychology: Classic and contemporary integrations. Chicago: Rand-McNally.
30. Moscovici, S., & Paicheler, G. (1978). Social comparison and social recognition: Two complementary processes of identification. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups (pp. 251-266). London: Academic Press.
31. Mullen, B., & Hu, L.-T. (1989). Perceptions of ingroup and outgroup variability: A meta-analytic integration. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 10, 233-252.
32. Ng, S. H. (1985). Biases in reward allocation resulting from personal status, group status, and allocation procedure. Australian Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 297-307.
33. Ng, S. H. (1986). Equity, intergroup bias and interpersonal bias in reward allocation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 16, 239-255.
34. Oakes, P. J., & Turner, J. C. (1980). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour: Does minimal intergroup discrimination make social identity more positive? European Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 295-301.
35. Okami, P. (1992). Intolerable grievances patiently endured: Referent cognitions and group conflict as mediators of anti-Jewish sentiment among African-Americans. Political Psychology, 13, 727-753.
36. Rabbie, J. M., & Horwitz, M. (1988). Categories versus groups as explanatory concepts in intergroup relations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 117-123.
37. Sachdev, I., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1984). Minimal majorities and minorities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 14, 35-52.
38. Sachdev, I., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1985). Social categorization and power differentials in group relations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 415-434.
39. Sachdev, I., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1987). Status differentials and intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 277-293.
40. Sherif, M., Harvey, O. J., White, B. J., Hood, W. R., & Sherif, C. W. (1961). Intergroup cooperation and competition: The Robbers Cave experiment. Norman, OK: University Book Exchange.
41. Simon, B., & Brown, R. (1987). Perceived homogeneity in minority-majority contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 703-711.
42. Simon, B., & Pettigrew, T. F. (1990). Social identity and perceived group homogeneity: Evidence for the ingroup homogeneity effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 269-286.
43. Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149-178.
44. Taylor, D. M., & McKirnan, D. J. (1984). A five-stage model of intergroup relations. British Journal of Psychology, 23, 291-300.
45. Taylor, D. M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1987). Theories of intergroup relations: International social psychological perspectives. New York: Praeger.
46. Turner, J. C. (1978). Social comparison, similarity and ingroup favoritism. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups (pp. 235-250). London: Academic Press.
47. Vanbeselaere, N. (1991). The impact of in-group and out-group homogeneity/heterogeneity upon intergroup relations. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12, 291-301.
48. Wagner, V., Lampen, L., & Syllwaschy, J. (1986). In-group inferiority, social identity and out-group devaluation in a modified minimal group study. British Journal of Psychology, 25, 15-23.
49. Wilder, D. A. (1986). Social categorization: Implications for creation and reduction of intergroup conflict. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 293-355). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
50. Wilder, D. A., & Thompson, J. E. (1988). Assimilation and contrast effects in the judgments of groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 62-73.
51. Wills, T. A. (1981). Downward comparison principles in social psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 245-271.
52. Worchel, S., & Rothgerber, H. (1997). Changing the stereotype of the stereotype. In R. Spears, P. Oakes, N. Ellemers, & S. Haslam (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life: Emphasizing the side of group perceptions (pp. 72-93). London: Sage.