Negative priming is stronger for task-relevant dimensions: Evidence of flexibility in the selective ignoring of distractor information

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 59, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 683-693

  Frings, Christian ^a   Wentura, Dirk ^a  

^a SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PAIRED ASSOCIATE LEARNING; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; RECEPTIVE FIELD; REVIEW;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; FEMALE; FIELD DEPENDENCE-INDEPENDENCE; HUMANS; MALE; PAIRED-ASSOCIATE LEARNING; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME;

EID: 33645089717     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02724980443000872     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. Allport, D. A., Tipper, S. P., & Chmiel, N. R. J. (1985). Perceptual integration and postcategorial filtering. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance XI (pp. 107-132). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
2. Dalrymple-Alford, E. C., &. Budayr, B. (1966). Examination of some aspects of the stroop color-word test. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 23, 1211-1214.
3. DeHouwer, J., Rothermund, K., & Wentura, D. (2001). Stimulus-feature-specific negative priming. Memory & Cognition, 29, 931-939.
4. DeSchepper, B. G., & Treisman, A. (1991, November). Novel visual shapes in negative priming. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, San Francisco, CA, USA.
5. Fox, E. (1995). Negative priming from ignored distractors in visual selection: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2, 145-173.
6. Frings, C., & Wentura, D. (2005). Negative priming with masked distractor-only prime trials: Evidence for a temporal discrimination account. Experimental Psychology, 52, 131-139.
7. Houghton, G., & Tipper, S. P. (1994). A model of inhibitory mechanisms in selective attention. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 53-112). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
8. Houghton, G., Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., & Shore, D. I. (1996). Inhibition and interference in selective attention: Some tests of a neural network model. Visual Cognition, 3, 119-164.
9. May, C. P., Kane, M. J., & Hasher, L. (1995). Determinants of negative priming. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 35-54.
10. Neill, W. T. (1977). Inhibition and facilitation processes in selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 444-450.
11. Neill, W. T. (1997). Episodic retrieval in negative priming and repetition priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1291-1305.
12. Neill, W. T., & Valdes, L. A. (1992). The persistence of negative priming. Steady-state or decay? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 565-576.
13. Neill, W. T., & Valdes, L. A. (1996). Facilitatory and inhibitory aspects of attention. In A. F. Kramer, M. Coles, & G. D. Logan (Eds.), Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention (pp. 77-106). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
14. Neill, W. T., Valdes, L. A., & Terry, K. M. (1992, November). Negative priming in target localization. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St. Louis, MO, USA.
15. Neill, W. T., Valdes, L. A., & Terry, K. M. (1995). Selective attention and the inhibitory control of cognition. In F. M. Dempster & C. J. Brainerd (Eds.), New perspectives on interference and inhibition in cognition (pp. 207-261). New York: Academic Press.
16. Read, L. E., & Proctor, R. W. (2004). Spatial stimulus-response compatibility and negative priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 41-48.
17. Shiu, L.-P., & Kornblum, S. (1996). Negative priming and stimulus-response compatibility. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 510-514.
18. Tipper, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 571-590.
19. Tipper, S. P. (2001). Does negative priming reflect inhibitory mechanisms? A review and integration of conflicting views. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 321-343.
20. Tipper, S. P., Brehaut, J. C., & Driver, J. (1990). Selection of moving and static objects for the control of spatially directed action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 492-504.
21. Tipper, S. P., McQueen, G. M., & Brehaut, J. C. (1988). Negative priming between response modalities: Evidence for the central locus of inhibition in selective attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 45-52.
22. Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., & Houghton, G. (1994): Behavioural goals determine inhibitory mechanisms of selective attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 809-840.
23. Wentura, D. (1999). Activation and inhibition of affective information: Evidence for negative priming in the evaluation task. Cognition of Emotion, 13, 65-91.
24. Wentura, D., & Rothermund, K. (2003). The "meddling-in" of affective information: A general model of automatic evaluation effects. In J. Musch & K. C. Klauer (Eds.), The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion (pp. 51-86). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
25. Wong, K. F. E. (2000). Dissociative prime-probe contextual similarity effects on negative priming and repetition priming: A challenge to episodic retrieval as a unified account on negative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1411-1422.