Priming and intrusion errors in RSVP streams with two response dimensions

Psychological Research

Volumn 72, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 281-288

  Loach, Daniel ^a   Botella, Juan ^b   Privado, Jesús ^b   Tsotsos, John K ^c  

^a MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^c YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; HUMAN; REACTION TIME; VISION;

ATTENTION; HUMANS; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 40949126980     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-007-0116-4     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Botella J., & Villar, M. V. (1986). Identificación de palabras en presentación rápida de series visuales: Una réplica del "efecto Lawrence". Conocimiento y Acción, 1, 7-21.
2. Botella J., & Eriksen, C. W. (1992). Filtering versus parallel processing in RSVP tasks. Perception and Psychophysics, 51, 334-343.
3. Botella, J., García, M. L., & Barriopedro, M. I. (1992). Intrusion patterns in rapid serial visual presentation tasks with two response dimensions. Perception and Psychophysics, 52, 547-552.
4. Botella J., Barriopedro M. I., & Suero, M. (2001). A model of the formation of illusory conjunctions in the time domain. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 1452-1467.
5. Bowman, H., & Wyble, B. P. (2007). The simultaneous type, serial token model of temporal attention and working memory. Psychological Review, 114, 38-70.
6. Caputo, G., & Guerra, S. (1998). Attentional selection by distractor suppression. Vision Research, 38, 669-689.
7. Chun, M. M. (1997). Temporal binding errors are redistributed by the attentional blink. Perception and Psychophysics, 59, 1191-1199.
8. Cutzu, F., & Tsotsos, J. K. (2003). The selective tuning model of attention: Psychophysical evidence for a supressive annulus around an attended item. Vision Research, 43, 205-219.
9. Di Lollo, V., Kawahara, J. I., Ghorashi, S. M., & Enns, J. T. (2005). The attentional blink: Resource depletion or temporary loss of control. Psychological Research, 69, 191-200.
10. Eriksen, C. W., & Hoffman, J. E. (1973). The extent of processing of noise elements during selective encoding from visual displays. Perception and Psychophysics, 14, 155-160.
11. Eriksen, C. W., & St James, J. D. (1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model. Perception and Psychophysics, 40, 225-240.
12. Eriksen, C. W., & Yeh, Y. Y. (1985). Allocation of attention in the visual field. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 583-597.
13. Kanwisher, N. (1987). Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation. Cognition, 27, 117-143.
14. Loach, D., & Marí-Beffa, P. (2003). Post-target inhibition: A temporal binding mechanism. Visual Cognition, 10, 513-526.
15. Muller, N., & Kleinschmidt, A. (2004). The attentional spotlights penumbra: Center-surround modulation in striate cortex. Neuroreport, 15, 977-980.
16. Olivers, C. N., van der Stigchel, S., & Hulleman, J. (2007). Spreading the sparing: Against a limited-capacity account of the attentional blink. Psychological Research, 71, 126-139.
17. Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 220-244.
18. Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R. R., & Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 160-174.
19. Potter, M. C., Staub, A., & O'Connor, D. H. (2002). The time course of competition for attention: Attention is initially labile. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1149-1162.
20. Shapiro, K. L., Driver, J., Ward, R., & Sorensen, R. E. (1997). Priming from the attentional blink: A failure to extract visual tokens but not visual types. Psychological Science, 8(2), 95-100.
21. Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 849-860.