When do irrelevant visual stimuli impair processing of identical targets?

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 67, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 897-909

  Wühr, Peter ^a   Müsseler, Jochen ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27844524932     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193542     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. ANDERSON, C. J., & NEILL, W. T. (2002). Two Bs or not two Bs? A signal detection theory analysis of repetition blindness in a counting task. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 732-740.
2. ARMSTRONG, I. T., & MEWHORT, D. J. K. (1995). Repetition deficit in rapid-serial-visual-presentation displays: Encoding failure or retrieval failure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 1044-1052.
3. BAVELIER, D., & POTTER, M. C. (1992). Visual and phonological codes in repetition blindness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 134-147.
4. BJORK, E. L., & MURRAY, J. T. (1977). On the nature of input channels in visual processing. Psychological Review, 84, 472-484.
5. CHUN, M. M. (1997). Types and tokens in visual processing: A double dissociation between the attentional blink and repetition blindness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 738-755.
6. EGETH, H. E., & SANTEE, J. L. (1981). Conceptual and perceptual components of interletter inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 7, 506-517.
7. EPSTEIN, R., & KANWISHER, N. (1999). Repetition blindness for locations: Evidence for automatic spatial coding in an RSVP task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 1855-1866.
8. ERIKSEN, B. A., & ERIKSEN, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143-149.
9. ERIKSEN, C. W., & ERIKSEN, B. A. (1979). Target redundancy in visual search: Do repetitions of the target within the display impair processing? Perception & Psychophysics, 26, 195-205.
10. ERIKSEN, C. W., MORRIS, N., YEH, Y.-Y., O'HARA, W., & DURST, R. T. (1981). Is recognition accuracy really impaired when the target is repeated in the display? Perception & Psychophysics, 30, 375-385.
11. ERIKSEN, C. W., & SCHULTZ, D. W. (1979). Information processing in visual search: A continuous flow conception and experimental results. Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 249-263.
12. ESTES, W. K. (1972). Interactions of signal and background variables in visual processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 12, 278-286.
13. ESTES, W. K. (1974). Redundancy of noise elements and signals in visual detection of letters. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 53-60.
14. FAGOT, C., & PASHLER, H. (1995). Repetition blindness: Perception or memory failure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 275-292.
15. FLOWERS, J. H., & WILCOX, N. (1982). The effect of flanking context on visual classification: The joint contribution of interactions at different processing levels. Perception & Psychophysics, 32, 581-591.
16. FOURNIER, L. R., & ERIKSEN, C. W. (1990). Coactivation in the perception of redundant targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 538-550.
17. JOHNSTON, J. C., HOCHHAUS, L., & RUTHRUFF, E. (2002). Repetition blindness has a perceptual locus: Evidence from online processing of targets in RSVP streams. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 477-489.
18. KAHNEMAN, D., TREISMAN, A., & BURKELL, J. (1983). The cost of visual filtering. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 9, 510-522.
19. KANWISHER, N. G. (1987). Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation. Cognition, 27, 117-143.
20. KANWISHER, N. G. (1991). Repetition blindness and illusory conjunctions: Errors in binding visual types with visual tokens. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 404-421.
21. KANWISHER, N. G., KIM, J. W., & WICKENS, T. D. (1996). Signal detection analyses of repetition blindness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 1249-1260.
22. KANWISHER, N. G., & POTTER, M. C. (1990). Repetition blindness: Levels of processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 30-47.
23. KEREN, G., & BOER, L. C. (1985). Necessary conditions for repeated-letter inferiority: The role of positional uncertainty. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance XI (pp. 601-612). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. KINCHLA, R. A. (1992). Attention. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 711-742.
25. LUO, C. R., & CARAMAZZA, A. (1995). Repetition blindness under minimum memory load: Effects of spatial and temporal proximity and the encoding effectiveness of the first item. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 1053-1064.
26. Luo, C. R., & CARAMAZZA, A. (1996). Temporal and spatial repetition blindness: Effects of presentation mode and repetition lag on the perception of repeated items. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 95-113.
27. MILLER, J. (1982). Divided attention: Evidence for coactivation with redundant signals. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 247-279.
28. MILLER, J. (1991). The flanker compatibility effect as a function of visual angle, attentional focus, visual transients, and perceptual load: A search for boundary conditions. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 270-288.
29. MOZER, M. C. (1989). Types and tokens in visual letter perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 287-303.
30. NEILL, W. T., NEELY, J. H., HUTCHISON, K. A., KAHAN, T. A., & VERWYS, C. A. (2002). Repetition blindness: Forward and backward. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 137-149.
31. PARK, J., & KANWISHER, N. (1994). Determinants of repetition blindness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 500-519.
32. SANTEE, J. L., & EGETH, H. E. (1980). Interference in letter identification: A test of feature-specific inhibition. Perception & Psychophysic, 1, 27, 321-330.
33. SANTEE, J. L., & EGETH, H. E. (1982). Do reaction time and accuracy measure the same aspects of letter recognition? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 8, 489-501.
34. TAYLOR, D. A. (1977). Time course of context effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 106, 404-426.
35. TREISMAN, A. M., & GELADE, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
36. WOODMAN, G. F., & LUCK, S. J. (2003). Serial deployment of attention during visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 121-138.
37. YANTIS, S. (1993). Stimulus-driven attentional capture. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2, 156-161.