Do stimulus-response bindings survive a task switch?

European Journal of Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 640-651

  Pösse, Bianca ^a,d   Waszak, Florian ^a,b   Hommel, Bernhard ^c  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

^c LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^d Cognitive Psychology Unit ^*  (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; COGNITION; COLOR; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECALL; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 33745407432     PISSN: 09541446     EISSN: 14640635     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09541440500423285     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Allport, D. A., Tipper, S. P., & Chmiel, N. R. J. (1985). Perceptual integration and postcategorical filtering. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance XI: Attention and neuropsychology (pp. 107-132). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
2. Beringer, J. (1995). Experimental Run Time System [Software]. Frankfurt, Germany: Berisoft Corporation.
3. Colzato, L. S., Erasmus, V., & Hommel, B. (2004). Moderate alcohol consumption in humans impairs feature binding in visual perception. Neuroscience Letters, 360, 103-105.
4. Dutzi, I. B., & Hommel, B. (2005). Spontaneous but goal-dependent binding of actions and their effects. Manuscript submitted for publication.
5. Fagot, C. (1994). Chronometric investigation of task switching. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of California, San Diego, USA.
6. Hommel, B. (1998a). Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1368-1384.
7. Hommel, B. (1998b). Event files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus-response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5, 183-216.
8. Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 494-500.
9. Hommel, B. (in press). Feature integration across perception and action: Event files affect response choice. Psychological Research.
10. Hommel, B., & Colzato, L. (2004). Visual attention and the temporal dynamics of feature integration. Visual Cognition, 11, 483-521.
11. Hommel, B., & Eglau, B. (2002). Control of stimulus - response translation in dual-task performance. Psychological Research, 66, 260-273.
12. Hommel, B., Pösse, B., & Waszak, F. (2000). Contextualization in perception and action. Psychologica Belgica, 40, 227-245.
13. Hübner, M., Dreisbach, G., Haider, H., & Kluwe, R. H. (2003). Backward inhibition as a means of sequential task-set control: Evidence for reduction of task competition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 289-297.
14. Mayr, U., & Keele, S. W. (2000). Changing internal constraints on action: The role of backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 4-26.
15. Mayr, U., & Kliegl, R. (2000). Task-set switching and long-term memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1124-1140.
16. Meiran, N. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1423-1442.
17. Pavlov, I. P. (1927). Conditioned reflexes (G. V. Anrep, Trans.). London: Oxford University Press.
18. Pösse, B. (2001). Eine Aufgabe umfasst mehr als eine Menge von Regeln: Zur Bindung von Reiz- und Reaktionsmerkmalen unter Aufgabenwechselbedingungen [A task includes more than a set of rules: On the binding of stimulus and response features under task-switch conditions]. Berlin, Germany: Logos.
19. Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1968). Errors and error correction in choice-response tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 264-272.
20. Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231.
21. Schuch, S., & Koch, I. (2003). The role of response selection for inhibition of task sets in task shifting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 92-105.
22. Spector, A., & Biederman, I. (1976). Mental set and shift revisited. American Journal of Psychology, 89, 669-679.
23. Thorndike, E. L. (1927). The law of effect. American Journal of Psychology, 39, 212-222.
24. Treisman, A. (1996). The binding problem. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 6, 171-178.
25. Waszak, F., Hommel, B., & Allport, A. (2003). Task-switching and long-term priming: Role of episodic stimulus-task bindings in task-shift costs. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 361-413.
26. Waszak, F., Hommel, B., & Allport, A. (2005). Interaction of task readiness and automatic retrieval in task-switching: Negative priming and competitor priming. Memory and Cognition, 33, 595-610.