Rapid proliferation of daughter cells lacking particular chromosomes due to multipolar mitosis promotes clonal evolution in colorectal cancer cells

Cell Cycle

Volumn 11, Issue 14, 2012, Pages 2650-2659

  Yang, Chao ^a,e   Shi, Xiaoyun ^a   Huang, Yun ^a   Zhang, Zhen ^a   Cooke, Howard J ^a,b   Wang, Mingrong ^c   Shi, Qinghua ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF CHINA   (China)

^b WESTERN GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c CANCER HOSPITAL   (China)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF CHINA   (China)

^e ANHUI NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Aneuploidy; Cell cycle; Chromosome instability; Colorectal cancer cells; Fluorescence in situ hybridization; Long term live cell imaging; Multipolar mitosis

Indexed keywords

ANEUPLOIDY; ARTICLE; CANCER CELL; CELL DIVISION; CELL EXPANSION; CELL POPULATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SURVIVAL; CHROMOSOMAL INSTABILITY; CHROMOSOME 12; CHROMOSOME 17; CHROMOSOME 6; CHROMOSOME 7; CHROMOSOME 8; CHROMOSOME LOSS; COLORECTAL CANCER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAUGHTER CELL; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; KARYOTYPE; MITOSIS; NONDISJUNCTION;

EID: 84864389195     PISSN: 15384101     EISSN: 15514005     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/cc.20976     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Cahill DP, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Lengauer C. Genetic instability and darwinian selection in tumours. Trends Cell Biol 1999; 9:57-60; PMID:10611684; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0962-8924(99)01661-X.
2. Duesberg P, Stindl R, Hehlmann R. Explaining the high mutation rates of cancer cells to drug and multidrug resistance by chromosome reassortments that are catalyzed by aneuploidy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 97:14295-300; PMID:11121035; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.26.14295.
3. McClelland SE, Burrell RA, Swanton C. Chromosomal instability: a composite phenotype that influences sensitivity to chemotherapy. Cell Cycle 2009; 8:3262-6; PMID:19806022; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.8.20.9690.
4. Sotillo R, Schvartzman JM, Socci ND, Benezra R. Mad2-induced chromosome instability leads to lung tumour relapse after oncogene withdrawal. Nature 2010; 464:436-40; PMID:20173739; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08803.
5. Weaver BA, Cleveland DW. Does aneuploidy cause cancer? Curr Opin Cell Biol 2006; 18:658-67; PMID:17046232; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2006.10. 002.
6. Lengauer C, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. Genetic instability in colorectal cancers. Nature 1997; 386:623-7; PMID:9121588; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ 386623a0.
7. Lengauer C, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. Genetic instabilities in human cancers. Nature 1998; 396:643-9; PMID:9872311; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/25292.
8. Rajagopalan H, Nowak MA, Vogelstein B, Lengauer C. The significance of unstable chromosomes in colorectal cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2003; 3:695-701; PMID:12951588; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrc1165.
9. Nowell PC. The clonal evolution of tumor cell populations. Science 1976; 194:23-8; PMID:959840; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.959840.
10. Loeb LA. Mutator phenotype may be required for multistage carcinogenesis. Cancer Res 1991; 51:3075-9; PMID:2039987.
11. Saunders W. Centrosomal amplification and spindle multipolarity in cancer cells. Semin Cancer Biol 2005; 15:25-32; PMID:15613285; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.semcancer.2004.09.003.
12. Manning AL, Longworth MS, Dyson NJ. Loss of pRB causes centromere dysfunction and chromosomal instability. Genes Dev 2010; 24:1364-76; PMID:20551165; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1917310.
13. Wang X, Cheung HW, Chun AC, Jin DY, Wong YC. Mitotic checkpoint defects in human cancers and their implications to chemotherapy. Front Biosci 2008; 13:2103-14; PMID:17981695; http://dx.doi.org/10.2741/2827.
14. Barber TD, McManus K, Yuen KW, Reis M, Parmigiani G, Shen D, et al. Chromatid cohesion defects may underlie chromosome instability in human colorectal cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008; 105:3443-8; PMID:18299561; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0712384105.
15. van Harn T, Foijer F, van Vugt M, Banerjee R, Yang F, Oostra A, et al. Loss of Rb proteins causes genomic instability in the absence of mitogenic signaling. Genes Dev 2010; 24:1377-88; PMID:20551164; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/ gad.580710.
16. Bakhoum SF, Thompson SL, Manning AL, Compton DA. Genome stability is ensured by temporal control of kinetochore-microtubule dynamics. Nat Cell Biol 2009; 11:27-35; PMID:19060894; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1809.
17. Thompson SL, Compton DA. Examining the link between chromosomal instability and aneuploidy in human cells. J Cell Biol 2008; 180:665-72; PMID:18283116; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200712029.
18. Stewénius Y, Gorunova L, Jonson T, Larsson N, Höglund M, Mandahl N, et al. Structural and numerical chromosome changes in colon cancer develop through telomere-mediated anaphase bridges, not through mitotic multipolarity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102:5541-6; PMID:15809428; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0408454102.
19. Thompson SL, Bakhoum SF, Compton DA. Mechanisms of chromosomal instability. Curr Biol 2010; 20:285-95; PMID:20334839; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.cub.2010.01.034.
20. Brinkley BR. Managing the centrosome numbers game: from chaos to stability in cancer cell division. Trends Cell Biol 2001; 11:18-21; PMID:11146294; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0962-8924(00)01872-9.
21. Nigg EA. Centrosome aberrations: cause or consequence of cancer progression? Nat Rev Cancer 2002; 2:815-25; PMID:12415252; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1038/nrc924.
22. Cimini D, Fioravanti D, Salmon ED, Degrassi F. Merotelic kinetochore orientation versus chromosome mono-orientation in the origin of lagging chromosomes in human primary cells. J Cell Sci 2002; 115:507-15; PMID:11861758.
23. Ganem NJ, Godinho SA, Pellman D. A mechanism linking extra centrosomes to chromosomal instability. Nature 2009; 460:278-82; PMID:19506557; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08136.
24. Silkworth WT, Nardi IK, Scholl LM, Cimini D. Multipolar spindle pole coalescence is a major source of kinetochore mis-attachment and chromosome missegregation in cancer cells. PLoS One 2009; 4:6564; PMID:19668340; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006564.
25. Fujiwara T, Bandi M, Nitta M, Ivanova EV, Bronson RT, Pellman D. Cytokinesis failure generating tetraploids promotes tumorigenesis in p53-null cells. Nature 2005; 437:1043-7; PMID:16222300; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ nature04217.
26. Blagosklonny MV. Mitotic arrest and cell fate: why and how mitotic inhibition of transcription drives mutually exclusive events. Cell Cycle 2007; 6:70-4; PMID:17245109; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.6.1.3682.
27. Camps J, Ponsa I, Ribas M, Prat E, Egozcue J, Peinado MA, et al. Comprehensive measurement of chromosomal instability in cancer cells: combination of fluorescence in situ hybridization and cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay. FASEB J 2005; 19:828-30; PMID:15760839.
28. Shih IM, Zhou W, Goodman SN, Lengauer C, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. Evidence that genetic instability occurs at an early stage of colorectal tumorigenesis. Cancer Res 2001; 61:818-22; PMID:11221861.
29. King RW. When 2 + 2 = 5: the origins and fates of aneuploid and tetraploid cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 2008; 1786:4-14; PMID:18703117.
30. Roschke AV, Stover K, Tonon G, Schäffer AA, Kirsch IR. Stable karyotypes in epithelial cancer cell lines despite high rates of ongoing structural and numerical chromosomal instability. Neoplasia 2002; 4:19-31; PMID:11922387; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.neo.7900197.
31. Shi Q, King RW. Chromosome nondisjunction yields tetraploid rather than aneuploid cells in human cell lines. Nature 2005; 437:1038-42; PMID:16222248; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature03958.
32. Cimini D. Merotelic kinetochore orientation, aneuploidy and cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta 2008; 1786:32-40; PMID:18549824.
33. Bayani J, Paderova J, Murphy J, Rosen B, Zielenska M, Squire JA. Distinct patterns of structural and numerical chromosomal instability characterize sporadic ovarian cancer. Neoplasia 2008; 10:1057-65; PMID:18813350.
34. Vitale I, Senovilla L, Jemaà M, Michaud M, Galluzzi L, Kepp O, et al. Multipolar mitosis of tetraploid cells: inhibition by p53 and dependency on Mos. EMBO J 2010; 29:1272-84; PMID:20186124; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj. 2010.11.
35. Fearon ER, Vogelstein B. A genetic model for colorectal tumorigenesis. Cell 1990; 61:759-67; PMID:2188735; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(90) 90186-I.
36. Cimini D, Cameron LA, Salmon ED. Anaphase spindle mechanics prevent mis-segregation of merotelically oriented chromosomes. Curr Biol 2004; 14:2149-55; PMID:15589159; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2004.11.029.
37. Thompson SL, Compton DA. Chromosome missegregation in human cells arises through specific types of kinetochore-microtubule attachment errors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011; 108:17974-8; PMID:21997207; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas. 1109720108.
38. Cimini D, Moree B, Canman JC, Salmon ED. Merotelic kinetochore orientation occurs frequently during early mitosis in mammalian tissue cells and error correction is achieved by two different mechanisms. J Cell Sci 2003; 116:4213-25; PMID:12953065; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.00716.
39. Gisselsson D, Håkanson U, Stoller P, Marti D, Jin Y, Rosengren AH, et al. When the genome plays dice: circumvention of the spindle assembly checkpoint and near-random chromosome segregation in multipolar cancer cell mitoses. PLoS One 2008; 3:1871; PMID:18392149; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0001871.
40. Kwon M, Godinho SA, Chandhok NS, Ganem NJ, Azioune A, Thery M, et al. Mechanisms to suppress multipolar divisions in cancer cells with extra centrosomes. Genes Dev 2008; 22:2189-203; PMID:18662975; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1101/gad.1700908.
41. 1 DNA content mediated by prolonged mitosis. Oncogene 2008; 27:4402-10; PMID:18469851; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/onc.2008.82.
42. Ianzini F, Kosmacek EA, Nelson ES, Napoli E, Erenpreisa J, Kalejs M, et al. Activation of meiosis-specific genes is associated with depolyploidization of human tumor cells following radiation-induced mitotic catastrophe. Cancer Res 2009; 69:2296-304; PMID:19258501; http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08- 3364.
43. Vitale I, Jemaà M, Senovilla L, Galluzzi L, Rello-Varona S, Metivier D, et al. Involvement of p38alpha in the mitotic progression of p53(-/-) tetraploid cells. Cell Cycle 2010; 9:2823-9; PMID:20686359; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.9.14.12254.
44. Torres EM, Sokolsky T, Tucker CM, Chan LY, Boselli M, Dunham MJ, et al. Effects of aneuploidy on cellular physiology and cell division in haploid yeast. Science 2007; 317:916-24; PMID:17702937; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science. 1142210.
45. Williams BR, Prabhu VR, Hunter KE, Glazier CM, Whittaker CA, Housman DE, et al. Aneuploidy affects proliferation and spontaneous immortalization in mammalian cells. Science 2008; 322:703-9; PMID:18974345; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1126/science.1160058.
46. Weaver BA, Cleveland DW. The aneuploidy paradox in cell growth and tumorigenesis. Cancer Cell 2008; 14:431-3; PMID:19061834; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.ccr.2008.11.011.
47. Pavelka N, Rancati G, Zhu J, Bradford WD, Saraf A, Florens L, et al. Aneuploidy confers quantitative proteome changes and phenotypic variation in budding yeast. Nature 2010; 468:321-5; PMID:20962780; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ nature09529.
48. Ly P, Eskiocak U, Kim SB, Roig AI, Hight SK, Lulla DR, et al. Characterization of aneuploid populations with trisomy 7 and 20 derived from diploid human colonic epithelial cells. Neoplasia 2011; 13:348-57; PMID:21472139.
49. Daniel J, Coulter J, Woo JH, Wilsbach K, Gabrielson E. High levels of the Mps1 checkpoint protein are protective of aneuploidy in breast cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011; 108:5384-9; PMID:21402910; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1073/pnas.1007645108.
50. Basto R, Brunk K, Vinadogrova T, Peel N, Franz A, Khodjakov A, et al. Centrosome amplification can initiate tumorigenesis in flies. Cell 2008; 133:1032-42; PMID:18555779; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.05.039.