Performance-based assessment in an online course: Comparing different types of information literacy instruction

Portal

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 283-298

  Mery, Yvonne ^a   Newby, Jill ^a   Peng, Ke ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^b WESTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864187233     PISSN: 15312542     EISSN: 15307131     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/pla.2012.0029     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. "Characteristics of Programs of Information Literacy that Illustrate Best Practices: A Guideline," American Library Association, (2012), http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/characteristics (accessed April 2, 2012).
2. Leslie Sult and Vicki Mills, "A Blended Method for Integrating Information Literacy Instruction into English Composition Classes," Reference Services Review 34, 3 (2006): 368-388.
3. Yvonne Mery et al., "Developing an Online Credit IL Course for a Freshman Writing Program in a University Setting," in Best Practices for Credit-Bearing Information Literacy Courses, ed. Christopher V. Hollister (Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries, 2010) 77.
4. Yvonne Mery, Jill Newby, and Ke Peng, "Assessing the Reliability and Validity of Locally Developed Information Literacy Test Items," Reference Services Review 39,1 (2011): 98-122.
5. Yvonne Mery, Jill Newby, and Ke Peng, "Why One-shot Information Literacy Sessions are Not the Future of Instruction: A Case for Online Credit Courses," College and Research Libraries, preprint, http://crl.acrl.org/content/early/2011/08/26/crl-271.short (accessed October 7, 2011).
6. Megan Oakleaf, "Dangers and Opportunities: A Conceptual Map of Information Literacy Assessment Approaches," portal: Libraries and the Academy 8, 3 (2008): 233-253.
7. Karen Hovde, "Check the Citation: Library Instruction and Student Paper Bibliographies," Research Strategies 17, 1 (2000): 3-9.
8. Sarah Clark and Susan Chinburg, "Research Performance in Undergraduates Receiving Face to Face versus Online Library Instruction: A Citation Analysis," Journal of Library Administration 50, 5/6 (2010): 530-542.
9. Philip M. Davis and Suzanne A. Cohen, "The Effect of the Web on Undergraduate Citation Behavior, 1996-1999," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 52, 4 (2001): 309-314
10. Philip M. Davis, Suzanne A. Cohen "Effect of the Web on Undergraduate Citation Behavior: Guiding Student Scholarship in a Networked Age," portal: Libraries and the Academy 3, 1 (2003): 41-51.
11. Andrew M. Robinson and Karen Schlegl, "Student Bibliographies Improve When Professors Provide Enforceable Guidelines for Citations," portal: Libraries and the Academy 4, 2 (2004): 275-290.
12. Clarkand Chinburg, "Research Performance,"530.
13. Rui Wang. "The Lasting Impact of a Library Credit Course," portal: Libraries and the Academy 6, 1 (2006): 79-92.
14. David Scharf et al., "Direct Assessment of Information Literacy using Writing Portfolios,"Journal of Academic Librarianship 33, 4 (2007): 462-477.
15. Stephanie Rosenblatt, "They Can Find It, but They Don't Know What To Do With It: Describing the Use Of Scholarly Literature by Undergraduate Students," Journal of Information Literacy4, 2 (2010): 50-61.
16. Mery et. al., "Developing an Online Credit IL Course," 77.
17. Wang. "Lasting Impact," 79.
18. Gloriana St. Clair and Rose Mary Magrill, "Incomplete Citations in Undergraduate Term Papers from Four Campuses," RQ 30, 1 (1990): 75-82.
19. th ed. (New York: Modern Language Association of America, 2009).
20. Mery, Newby, and Peng. "Why One-shot Information."
21. Davis, "Effect of the Web," 49.
22. Mery, Newby, and Peng. "Why One-shot Information."