Developing Computer-Based Participatory Approaches to Mapping Landscape Values for Landscape and Resource Management

GeoJournal Library

Volumn 95, Issue , 2009, Pages 431-448

  Carver, Steve ^a   Watson, Alan ^b   Waters, Tim ^c   Matt, Roian ^d   Gunderson, Kari ^e   Davis, Brett ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^b USDA Forest Service Aldo Leopold Wilderness Research Institute   (United States)

^c Education Leeds   (United Kingdom)

^d College of Forestry and Conservation ^*  (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA   (United States)

Author keywords

Buffer Zone; Fire Management; Focus Group Interview; Fuel Treatment; Spray Pattern

Indexed keywords

EID: 85103697155     PISSN: 09245499     EISSN: 22150072     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-8952-7_21     Document Type: Chapter

References (26)

1. Beebe, J. (1995) Basic concepts and techniques of rapid appraisal, Human Organization, 54(1): 42–51.
2. Carver, S., Evans, A. and Watson, A. (2005) Mapping sense of place and associated wild land values using online GIS and fuzzy methods: some examples from Europe and the US, Paper presented at the 8th World Wilderness Congress, Anchorage, Alaska, October.
3. Carver, S., Evans, A., Kingston, R. and Turton, I. (2001) Public participation, GIS and cyberde-mocracy: evaluating on-line spatial decision support systems, Environment and Planning B, 28(6): 907– 921.
4. Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes (CSKT) (2005a) Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes Forestry Department Wilderness Buffer Zone Reclassification Environmental Assessment, Report prepared by the Buffer Zone Interdisciplinary Team, Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Indian Reservation, Pablo, MO.
5. Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes (CSKT) (2005b) Fire on the Land: An Interactive Educational DVD, Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Indian Reservation, Pablo, MO.
6. Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes (CSKT) (2005c) Ecosystem Management on the Flathead Indian Reservation Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes Forestry Department, Pablo, MO.
7. Evans, A.J. and Waters, T. (2007) Mapping vernacular geography: web-based GIS tools for capturing “fuzzy” or “vague” entities, International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management, 7(2): 134–150.
8. Gordon, A.C., Gordon, M. and Dorr, J. (2003) Native American technology access: the Gates Foundation in Four Corners, The Electronic Library, 21(5): 428–434.
9. Gunderson, K. (2006) Understanding place meanings for wilderness: personal and community values at risk, International Journal of Wilderness 12(1): 27–31.
10. Gunderson, K. and Watson, A. (2007) Understanding place meanings on the Bitterroot National Forest, Montana, Society and Natural Resources, 20: 705–721.
11. Hoffman, D.L., Novak, T.P. and Schlosser, A.E. (2001) The evolution of the digital divide, In Com-paine, B.M. (ed.) The Digital Divide, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 47–97.
12. Jenks, G.F. (1967) The data model concept in statistical mapping, International Yearbook of Cartography, 7: 186–190.
13. Johnson, E.A., Miyanishi, K. and Bridge, S.R.J. (2001) Wildfire regime in the Boreal Forest and the idea of suppression and fuel buildup, Conservation Biology 15(6): 1554–1557.
14. Kimmerer, R.W. and Lake, F.K. (2003) The role of indigenous burning in land management, Journal of Forestry, 99(11): 36–41.
15. Lewis, J.L. and Sheppard, S.R.J. (2005) Ancient values, new challenges: Indigenous spiritual perceptions of landscapes and forest management, Society and Natural Resources 18: 907–920.
16. Miller, C. (2006) Wilderness fire management in a changing world, International Journal of Wilderness, 12(1): 18–21.
17. Monroe, B. (2002) The internet in Indian country, Computers and Composition, 19: 285–296.
18. Russell, G.T., McCaffrey, S.J. and Theresa, B. (2004) Science basis for changing forest structure to modify wildfire behavior and severity, General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-120, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO.
19. Watson, A., Knotek, K., Matt, R. and Yung, L. (2007) Understanding landscape meanings, attributes, and threats for the planning and application of fuel treatment and fire management on the Flathead Indian Reservation, Montana, Report to the Confederated Salish & Kootenia Tribes of Montana, Aldo Leopold Wilderness Research Institute, Missoula, MO.
20. Watson, A., Matt, R., Knotek, K., Williams, D. and Yung, L. (In press) Traditional wisdom—pro-tecting wilderness as a cultural landscape, Proceedings Sharing Indigenous Wisdom International Conference, Green Bay, Wisconsin, June 2007.
21. Westerling, A.L., Hidalgo, H.G., Cayan, D.R. and Swetnam, T.W. (2006) Forest wildfire activity warming and earlier spring increase Western US, Science, 313(5789): 940–943.
22. Wray, J. and Anderson, M.K. (2003) Restoring Indian-Set Fires to Prairie Ecosystems on the Olympic Peninsula, Ecological Restoration 21(4): 296–301.
23. Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes (CSKT) (2007) Fire on the Land, Retrieved October 2, 2007, from www.cskt.org/fire_history.swf.
24. Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes (CSKT) (2005) Mission Mountains Tribal Wilderness. A Case Study, Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Indian Reservation, Pablo, MO.
25. Craig, W.J., Harris, T.M. and Weiner, D. (2002) Community Participation and Geographic Information Systems, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
26. Fritz, S., Carver, S. and See, L. (2000) New approaches to wild land mapping in Europe, Proceedings of the Wilderness Science in a Time of Change Conference, USDA Forest Service Proceedings RMRS-P-15-VOL-2 (2000) Missoula, MO, pp. 120–127.