Sphingolipids Regulate the Yeast High-Osmolarity Glycerol Response Pathway

Molecular and Cellular Biology

Volumn 32, Issue 14, 2012, Pages 2861-2870

  Tanigawa, Mirai ^a   Kihara, Akio ^b   Terashima, Minoru ^a   Takahara, Terunao ^a   Maeda, Tatsuya ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^b HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ERGOSTEROL; GLYCEROL; SPHINGOLIPID;

ARTICLE; CELL MEMBRANE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HIGH OSMOLARITY GLYCEROL RESPONSE; LIPOGENESIS; NONHUMAN; OSMOLARITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STEROL SYNTHESIS; YEAST;

FILIPIN; GENES, FUNGAL; GLYCEROL; INTRACELLULAR SIGNALING PEPTIDES AND PROTEINS; MAP KINASE SIGNALING SYSTEM; MEMBRANE MICRODOMAINS; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; MITOGEN-ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASES; MUTATION; OSMOLAR CONCENTRATION; OSMOTIC PRESSURE; PROTEIN KINASES; RECOMBINANT FUSION PROTEINS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SPHINGOLIPIDS;

EID: 84864021799     PISSN: 02707306     EISSN: 10985549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.06111-11     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Alepuz PM, de Nadal E, Zapater M, Ammerer G, Posas F. 2003. Osmostress-induced transcription by Hot1 depends on a Hog1-mediated recruitment of the RNA Pol II. EMBO J. 22:2433-2442.
2. Bagnat M, Kernen S, Shevchenko A, Shevchenko A, Simons K. 2000. Lipid rafts function in biosynthetic delivery of proteins to the cell surface in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97:3254 -3259.
3. Broquet AH, Thomas G, Masliah J, Trugnan G, Bachelet M. 2003. Expression of the molecular chaperone Hsp70 in detergent-resistant microdomains correlates with its membrane delivery and release. J. Biol. Chem. 278:21601-21606.
4. Buede R, Rinker-Schaffer C, Pinto WJ, Lester RL, Dickson RC. 1991. Cloning and characterization of LCB1, a Saccharomyces gene required for biosynthesis of the long-chain base component of sphingolipids. J. Bacteriol. 173:4325- 4332.
5. Garay-Arroyo A, Covarrubias AA. 1999. Three genes whose expression is induced by stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 15:879-892.
6. Golub T, Wacha S, Caroni P. 2004. Spatial and temporal control of signaling through lipid rafts. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 14:542-550.
7. Grossmann G, Opekarová M, Malinsky J, Weig-Meckl I, Tanner W. 2007. Membrane potential governs lateral segregation of plasma membrane proteins and lipids in yeast. EMBO J. 26:1- 8.
8. Grzybek M, Kozubek A, Dubielecka P, Sikorski AF. 2005. Rafts-the current picture. Folia Histochem. Cytobiol. 43:3-10.
9. Güldener U, Heck S, Fielder T, Beinhauer J, Hegemann JH. 1996. A new efficient gene disruption cassette for repeated use in budding yeast. Nucleic Acids Res. 24:2519 -2524.
10. Haak D, Gable K, Beeler T, Dunn T. 1997. Hydroxylation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae ceramides requires Sur2p and Scs7p. J. Biol. Chem. 272: 29704-29710.
11. Hayashi M, Fukuzawa T, Sorimachi H, Maeda T. 2005. Constitutive activation of the pH-responsive Rim101 pathway in yeast mutants defective in late steps of the MVB/ESCRT pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25:9478- 9490.
12. Janke C, et al. 2004. A versatile toolbox for PCR-based tagging of yeast genes: new fluorescent proteins, more markers and promoter substitution cassettes. Yeast 21:947-962.
13. Kihara A, Sakuraba H, Ikeda M, Denpoh A, Igarashi Y. 2008. Membrane topology and essential amino acid residues of Phs1, a 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydratase involved in very long-chain fatty acid elongation. J. Biol. Chem. 283:11199 -11209.
14. Lingwood D, Simons K. 2007. Detergent resistance as a tool in membrane research. Nat. Protoc. 2:2159 -2165.
15. Lingwood D, Simons K. 2010. Lipid rafts as a membrane-organizing principle. Science 327:46 -50.
16. Longtine MS, et al. 1998. Additional modules for versatile and economical PCR-based gene deletion and modification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 14:953-961.
17. Maeda T, Takekawa M, Saito H. 1995. Activation of yeast PBS2 MAPKK by MAPKKKs or by binding of an SH3-containing osmosensor. Science 269:554 -558.
18. Maeda T, Wurgler-Murphy SM, Saito H. 1994. A two-component system that regulates an osmosensing MAP kinase cascade in yeast. Nature 369:242-245.
19. Nagiec MM, Baltisberger JA, Wells GB, Lester RL, Dickson RC. 1994. The LCB2 gene of Saccharomyces and the related LCB1 gene encode subunits of serine palmitoyltransferase, the initial enzyme in sphingolipid synthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91:7899 -7902.
20. Nagy E, et al. 2007. Hyperfluidization-coupled membrane microdomain reorganization is linked to activation of the heat shock response in a murine melanoma cell line. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104:7945-7950.
21. Nakano K, Yamamoto T, Kishimoto T, Noji T, Tanaka K. 2008. Protein kinases Fpk1p and Fpk2p are novel regulators of phospholipid asymmetry. Mol. Biol. Cell 19:1783-1797.
22. Nickels JT, Broach JR. 1996. A ceramide-activated protein phosphatase mediates ceramide-induced G1 arrest of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 10:382-394.
23. Norman AW, Demel RA, de Kruyff B, van Deenen LL. 1972. Studies on the biological properties of polyene antibiotics. Evidence for the direct interaction of filipin with cholesterol. J. Biol. Chem. 247:1918 -1929.
24. Oh CS, Toke DA, Mandala S, Martin CE. 1997. ELO2 and ELO3, homologues of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae ELO1 gene, function in fatty acid elongation and are required for sphingolipid formation. J. Biol. Chem. 272:17376 -17384.
25. O'Rourke SM, Herskowitz I, O'Shea EK. 2002. Yeast go the whole HOG for the hyperosmotic response. Trends Genet. 18:405- 412.
26. Park SJ, et al. 2009. Oxidative stress induces lipid-raft-mediated activation of Src homology 2 domain-containing protein-tyrosine phosphatase 2 in astrocytes. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 46:1694 -1702.
27. Posas F, Saito H. 1998. Activation of the yeast SSK2 MAP kinase kinase kinase by the SSK1 two-component response regulator. EMBO J. 17: 1385-1394.
28. Posas F, et al. 1996. Yeast HOG1 MAP kinase cascade is regulated by a multistep phosphorelay mechanism in the SLN1-YPD1-SSK1 "twocomponent" osmosensor. Cell 86:865- 875.
29. Reiser V, Raitt DC, Saito H. 2003. Yeast osmosensor Sln1 and plant cytokinin receptor Cre1 respond to changes in turgor pressure. J. Cell Biol. 161:1035-1040.
30. Reiser V, Salah SM, Ammerer G. 2000. Polarized localization of yeast Pbs2 depends on osmostress, the membrane protein Sho1 and Cdc42. Nat. Cell Biol. 2:620-627.
31. Rhodes N, Connell L, Errede B. 1990. STE11 is a protein kinase required for cell-type-specific transcription and signal transduction in yeast. Genes Dev. 4:1862-1874.
32. Roelants FM, Baltz AG, Trott AE, Fereres S, Thorner J. 2010. A protein kinase network regulates the function of aminophospholipid flippases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 107:34 -39.
33. Rothstein R. 1991. Targeting, disruption, replacement, and allele rescue: integrative DNA transformation in yeast. Methods Enzymol. 194:281- 301.
34. Suzuki KG, et al. 2007. GPI-anchored receptor clusters transiently recruit Lyn andGalpha for temporary cluster immobilization and Lyn activation: single-molecule tracking study 1. J. Cell Biol. 177:717-730.
35. Tao W, Malone CL, Ault AD, Deschenes RJ, Fassler JS. 2002. A cytoplasmic coiled-coil domain is required for histidine kinase activity of the yeast osmosensor, SLN1. Mol. Microbiol. 43:459-473.
36. Tatebayashi K, et al. 2007. Transmembrane mucins Hkr1 and Msb2 are putative osmosensors in the SHO1 branch of yeast HOG pathway. EMBO J. 26:3521-3533.
37. Tatebayashi K, et al. 2006. Adaptor functions of Cdc42, Ste50, and Sho1 in the yeast osmoregulatory HOG MAPK pathway. EMBO J. 25:3033- 3044.
38. Umebayashi K, Nakano A. 2003. Ergosterol is required for targeting of tryptophan permease to the yeast plasma membrane. J. Cell Biol. 161: 1117-1131.
39. Varela JC, Praekelt UM, Meacock PA, Planta RJ, Mager WH. 1995. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae HSP12 gene is activated by the high-osmolarity glycerol pathway and negatively regulated by protein kinase A. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:6232- 6245.
40. Vojtek AB, Hollenberg SM, Cooper JA. 1993. Mammalian Ras interacts directly with the serine/threonine kinase Raf. Cell 74:205-214.
41. Wittig I, Braun HP, Schägger H. 2006. Blue native PAGE. Nat. Protoc. 1:418-428.