Repetition of Bateman challenges the paradigm

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 109, Issue 29, 2012, Pages 11476-11477

  Tang Martínez, Zuleyma ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI ST LOUIS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BATEMAN; DROSOPHILA; MARKER GENE; MEDICAL LITERATURE; METHODOLOGY; NOTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SEXUAL SELECTION; SIMULATION; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHENOTYPE; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL;

EID: 84863979330     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1209394109     Document Type: Note

References (20)

1. Bateman AJ (1948) Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity (Edinb) 2:349-368.
2. Arnold SJ (1994) Bateman principles and the measurement of sexual selection in plants and animals. Am Nat 144(Suppl):S126-S149.
3. Sutherland WJ (1985) Chance can produce sex differences in mating success and explain Bateman's data. Anim Behav 33:1339-1352.
4. Hubbell SP, Johnson LK (1987) Environmental variance in lifetime mating success, mate choice, and sexual selection. Am Nat 130:91-112.
5. Gowaty PA, Hubbell SP (2005) Chance, time allocation, and the evolution of adaptively flexible sex role behavior. Integr Comp Biol 45:931-944. (Pubitemid 43098225)
6. Tang-Martinez Z, Ryder TB (2005) The problem with paradigms: Bateman's worldview as a case study. Integr Comp Biol 45:821-830. (Pubitemid 43098214)
7. Gowaty PA, Kim Y-K, Anderson WW (2012) No evidence of sexual selection in a repetition of Bateman's classic study of Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:11740-11745.
8. Tang-Martínez Z (2010) Bateman's Principles: Original experiment and modern data for and against. Encyclopedia of Animal Behavior, eds Breed MD, Moore J (Academic Press, Oxford, UK), pp 166-176.
9. Woolfenden BE, Gibbs HL, Sealy SG (2002) High opportunity for sexual selection in both sexes of an obligate brood parasitic bird, the brown-headed cowbird (Moluthrus ater). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 52:417-425. (Pubitemid 36059084)
10. Ketterson ED, et al. (1998) The relative impact of extra-pair fertilizations on variation in male and female reproductive success in dark-eyed juncos (Junco hyemalis). Ornithological Monographs 49:81-101.
11. Williams RN, DeWoody JA (2009) Reproductive and sexual selection in eastern wild tiger salamanders (Ambystoma t. tigrinum). Evol Biol 36:201-213.
12. Lorch PD, Bussière L, Gwynne DT (2008) Qualifying the potential for sexual dimorphism using upper limits on Bateman gradients. Behaviour 125(1):1-24. (Pubitemid 350172844)
13. Saether SA, Fiske P, Kålås JA (2001) Male mate choice, sexual conflict and strategic allocation of copulations in a lekking bird. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:2097-2102. (Pubitemid 33016086)
14. Arnaud L, Haubruge E (1999) Mating behaviour and male mate choice in Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera, Tenbrionidae). Behaviour 136:67-77.
15. Wedell N, Gage MJG, Parker GA (2002) Sperm competition, male precedence, and sperm-limited females. Trends Ecol Evol 17:313-320. (Pubitemid 34628657)
16. Snyder BF, Gowaty PA (2007) A reappraisal of Bateman's classic study of intrasexual selection. Evolution 61:2457-2468. (Pubitemid 350045548)
17. Jones AG, Arguello JR, Arnold SJ (2002) Validation of Bateman's principles: A genetic study of sexual selection and mating patterns in the rough-skinned newt. Proc Biol Sci 269:2533-2539. (Pubitemid 36071833)
18. Jones AG, Rosenqvist G, Berglund A, Arnold SJ, Avise JC (2000) The Bateman gradient and the cause of sexual selection in a sex-role-reversed pipefish. Proc Biol Sci 267:677-680. (Pubitemid 30197838)
19. Bjork A, Pitnick S (2006) Intensity of sexual selection along the anisogamy-isogamy continuum. Nature 441:742-745. (Pubitemid 43865218)
20. Gowaty PA (2004) Sexual Selection in Primates, eds Kappeler P, van Schaik C (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK), pp 37-54.