Quantitative three-dimensional evaluation of myocardial perfusion during regadenoson stress using multidetector computed tomography

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 443-449

  Mor Avi, Victor ^a   Lodato, Joseph A ^a   Kachenoura, Nadjia ^a,b   Chandra, Sonal ^a   Freed, Benjamin H ^a   Newby, Barbara ^a   Lang, Roberto M ^a   Patel, Amit R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b UPMC Univ Paris 06   (France)

Author keywords

cardiovascular CT; multidetector CT; myocardium; perfusion

Indexed keywords

BLOOD VESSELS; COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS; HEART; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY;

CARDIOVASCULAR CT; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IMAGES; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY STENOSIS; CT CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHIES; MULTIDETECTOR CT; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION; MYOCARDIUM; PERFUSION; PERFUSION ABNORMALITIES;

DISEASES;

REGADENOSON;

ADULT; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CORONARY HEMODYNAMICS; DIABETES MELLITUS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HEART MUSCLE PERFUSION; HUMAN; HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA; HYPERTENSION; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STRESS ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

EID: 84863938168     PISSN: 03638715     EISSN: 15323145     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e31825833a3     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Hulten EA, Carbonaro S, Petrillo SP, et al. Prognostic value of cardiac computed tomography angiography a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:1237-1247.
2. Pijls NH, De BB, Peels K, et al. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:1703-1708. (Pubitemid 26193622)
3. Tonino PA, Fearon WF, De BB, et al. Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:2816-2821.
4. Garcia MJ, Lessick J, Hoffmann MH. Accuracy of 16-row multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis. JAMA. 2006;296:403-411. (Pubitemid 44127524)
5. de Roos A, Kroft LJ, Bax JJ, et al. Applications of multislice computed tomography in coronary artery disease. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;26:14-22. (Pubitemid 47235226)
6. Deetjen AG, Conradi G, Mollmann S, et al. Diagnostic value of the 16-detector row multislice spiral computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery stenosis in comparison to invasive coronary angiography. Clin Cardiol. 2007;30:118-123. (Pubitemid 46435408)
7. Schroeder S, Achenbach S, Bengel F, et al. Cardiac computed tomography: indications, applications, limitations, and training requirements: report of a writing group deployed by the Working Group Nuclear Cardiology and Cardiac CT of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:531-556. (Pubitemid 351264173)
8. Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M, et al. Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2324-2336.
9. Techasith T, Cury RC. Stress myocardial CT perfusion: an update and future perspective. JACC Cardiovasc. 2011;4:905-916.
10. Mahnken AH, Koos R, Katoh M, et al. Assessment of myocardial viability in reperfused acute myocardial infarction using 16-slice computed tomography in comparison to magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:2042-2047. (Pubitemid 40814129)
11. Nikolaou K, Sanz J, Poon M, et al. Assessment of myocardial perfusion and viability from routine contrast-enhanced 16-detector-row computed tomography of the heart: preliminary results. Eur Radiol. 2005;15:864-871. (Pubitemid 41166717)
12. Gerber BL, Belge B, Legros GJ, et al. Characterization of acute and chronic myocardial infarcts by multidetector computed tomography: comparison with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance. Circulation. 2006;113:823-833.
13. Henneman MM, Schuijf JD, Jukema JW, et al. Comprehensive cardiac assessment with multislice computed tomography: evaluation of left ventricular function and perfusion in addition to coronary anatomy in patients with previous myocardial infarction. Heart. 2006;92:1779-1783. (Pubitemid 44851323)
14. Nieman K, Cury RC, Ferencik M, et al. Differentiation of recent and chronic myocardial infarction by cardiac computed tomography. Am J Cardiol. 2006;98:303-308. (Pubitemid 44062434)
15. Mahnken AH, Bruners P, Stanzel S, et al. Functional imaging in the assessment of myocardial infarction: MR imaging vs. MDCT vs. SPECT. Eur J Radiol. 2008;71:480-485.
16. Hoffmann U, Millea R, Enzweiler C, et al. Acute myocardial infarction: contrast-enhanced multi-detector row CT in a porcine model. Radiology. 2004;231:697-701. (Pubitemid 38668085)
17. Lardo AC, Cordeiro MA, Silva C, et al. Contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography viability imaging after myocardial infarction: characterization of myocyte death, microvascular obstruction, and chronic scar. Circulation. 2006;113:394-404. (Pubitemid 43803201)
18. Brodoefel H, Klumpp B, Reimann A, et al. Sixty-four-MDCT in the characterization of porcine acute and subacute myocardial infarction: determination of transmurality in comparison to magnetic resonance imaging and histopathology. Eur J Radiol. 2007;62:235-246. (Pubitemid 46560334)
19. Kachenoura N, Lodato JA, Gaspar T, et al. Value of multidetector computed tomography evaluation of myocardial perfusion in the assessment of ischemic heart disease: comparison with nuclear perfusion imaging. Eur Radiol. 2009;19:1897-1905.
20. Limbruno U, Petronio AS, Amoroso G, et al. The impact of coronary artery disease on the coronary vasomotor response to nonionic contrast media. Circulation. 2000;101:491-497. (Pubitemid 30080862)
21. Kurata A, Mochizuki T, Koyama Y, et al. Myocardial perfusion imaging using adenosine triphosphate stress multi-slice spiral computed tomography: alternative to stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. Circ J. 2005;69:550-557. (Pubitemid 40745727)
22. George RT, Silva C, Cordeiro MA, et al. Multidetector computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging during adenosine stress. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:153-160. (Pubitemid 43929222)
23. Kido T, Kurata A, Higashino H, et al. Quantification of regional myocardial blood flow using first-pass multidetector-row computed tomography and adenosine triphosphate in coronary artery disease. Circ J. 2008;72:1086-1091. (Pubitemid 351957073)
24. Blankstein R, Shturman LD, Rogers IS, et al. Adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging using dual-source cardiac computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:1072-1084.
25. George RT, rbab-Zadeh A, Miller JM, et al. Adenosine stress 64- and 256-row detector computed tomography angiography and perfusion imaging: a pilot study evaluating the transmural extent of perfusion abnormalities to predict atherosclerosis causing myocardial ischemia. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;2:174-182.
26. Cury RC, Magalhaes TA, Borges AC, et al. Dipyridamole stress and rest myocardial perfusion by 64-detector row computed tomography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 2010;106:310-315.
27. Okada DR, Ghoshhajra BB, Blankstein R, et al. Direct comparison of rest and adenosine stress myocardial perfusion CT with rest and stress SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol. 2010;17:27-37.
28. Rocha-Filho JA, Blankstein R, Shturman LD, et al. Incremental value of adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging with dual-source CT at cardiac CT angiography. Radiology. 2010;254:410-419.
29. Hosokawa K, Kurata A, Kido T, et al. Transmural perfusion gradient in adenosine triphosphate stress myocardial perfusion computed tomography. Circ J. 2011;75:1905-1912.
30. Ko BS, Cameron JD, Meredith IT, et al. Computed tomography stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients considered for revascularization: a comparison with fractional flow reserve. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:67-77.
31. Kachenoura N, Veronesi F, Lodato JA, et al. Volumetric quantification of myocardial perfusion using analysis of multi-detector computed tomography 3D datasets: comparison with nuclear perfusion imaging. Eur Radiol. 2010;20:337-347.
32. Patel AR, Lodato JA, Chandra S, et al. Detection of myocardial perfusion abnormalities using ultra-low radiation dose regadenoson stress multidetector computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2011;5:247-254.
33. Corsi C, Lang RM, Veronesi F, et al. Volumetric quantification of global and regional left ventricular function from real-time three-dimensional echocardiographic images. Circulation. 2005;112:1161-1170. (Pubitemid 41216123)
34. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2002;105:539-542. (Pubitemid 34262671)
35. Kachenoura N, Gaspar T, Lodato JA, et al. Combined assessment of coronary anatomy and myocardial perfusion using multidetector computed tomography for the evaluation of coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 2009;103:1487-1494.
36. Kuettner A, Kopp AF, Schroeder S, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with angiographically proven coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:831-839. (Pubitemid 38296484)
37. Hacker M, Jakobs T, Matthiesen F, et al. Combined functional and morphological imaging consisting of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT and 16-detector multislice spiral CT angiography in the noninvasive evaluation of coronary artery disease: first experiences. Clin Imaging. 2007;31:313-320. (Pubitemid 47351255)
38. Schuijf JD, Wijns W, Jukema JW, et al. Relationship between noninvasive coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography and myocardial perfusion imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:2508-2514. (Pubitemid 44881213)
39. Schuijf JD, Wijns W, Jukema JW, et al. A comparative regional analysis of coronary atherosclerosis and calcium score on multislice CT versus myocardial perfusion on SPECT. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:1749-1755. (Pubitemid 47544996)
40. van Werkhoven JM, Schuijf JD, Jukema JW, et al. Anatomic correlates of a normal perfusion scan using 64-slice computed tomographic coronary angiography. Am J Cardiol. 2008; 101:40-45. (Pubitemid 350297196)
41. Choe YH, Choo KS, Jeon ES, et al. Comparison of MDCT and MRI in the detection and sizing of acute and chronic myocardial infarcts. Eur J Radiol. 2008;66:292-299. (Pubitemid 351626400)
42. George RT, Jerosch-Herold M, Silva C, et al. Quantification of myocardial perfusion using dynamic 64-detector computed tomography. Invest Radiol. 2007;42:815-822. (Pubitemid 350126563)
43. Tamarappoo BK, Dey D, Nakazato R, et al. Comparison of the extent and severity of myocardial perfusion defects measured by CT coronary angiography and SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3:1010-1019.
44. Weininger M, Schoepf UJ, Ramachandra A, et al. Adenosine-stress dynamic real-time myocardial perfusion CT and adenosine-stress first-pass dual-energy myocardial perfusion CT for the assessment of acute chest pain: initial results. Eur J Radiol. 2010.
45. Bamberg F, Becker A, Schwarz F, et al. Detection of hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis: incremental diagnostic value of dynamic CT-based myocardial perfusion imaging. Radiology. 2011;260:690-698.