Applications of multislice computed tomography in coronary artery disease

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 14-22

  De Roos, Albert ^a   Kroft, Lucia J M ^a   Bax, Jeroen J ^a   Geleijns, Jacob ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Bypasses; Calcium score; Cardiac CT; Coronary disease; MSCT

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM;

ARTERY CALCIFICATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; GRAFT PATENCY; HEART FUNCTION; HUMAN; MULTISLICE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NON INVASIVE MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION DOSE; REVIEW; SCORING SYSTEM;

CONTRAST MEDIA; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; CORONARY DISEASE; HUMANS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 34547768024     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20971     Document Type: Review

References (62)

1. Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR. Viamonte M, Detrano R. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990;15:827-832.
2. Hong C, Bae KT, Pilgram TK. Coronary artery calcium: accuracy and reproducibility of measurements with multi-detector row CT-assessment of effects of different thresholds and quantification methods. Radiology 2003;227:795-801.
3. Hoffmann U, Siebert U, Bull-Stewart A, et al. Evidence for lower variability of coronary artery calcium mineral mass measurements by multi-detector computed tomography in a community-based cohort- consequences for progression studies. Eur Radiol (in press).
4. Geleijns J. Kroft LJM, Bax JJ, Lamb HJ, De Roos A. Techniques for cardiovascular computed tomography. In: Higgins CB, De Roos A, editors. MRI and CT of the cardiovascular system. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 2006. p 37-52.
5. Becker CR, Kleffel T, Crispin A, et al. Coronary artery calcium measurement: agreement of multi-row detector and electron beam CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;176:1295-1298.
6. Schoepf UJ, Becker CR, Ohnesorge BM, Yucel EK. CT of coronary artery disease. Radiology 2004;232:18-37.
7. Greenland P, LaBree L, Azen SP, Doherty TM, Detrano RC. Coronary artery calcium score combined with Framingham score for risk prediction in asymptomatic individuals. JAMA 2004;291:210-215.
8. He ZX, Hedrick TD, Pratt CM, et al. Severity of coronary artery calcification by electron beam computed tomography predicts silent myocardial ischemia. Circulation 2000;101:244-251.
9. Blumenthal RS, Becker DM, Yanek LR, et al. Comparison of coronary calcium and stress myocardial perfusion imaging in apparently healthy sibling of individuals with premature coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 2006:97:328-333.
10. Clouse ME. How useful is computed tomography for screening for coronary artery disease? [discussion on controversies in cardiovascular medicine]. Noninvasive screening for coronary artery disease with computed tomography is useful. Circulation 2006:113:125-146.
11. Chen J, Krumholz HM. How useful is computed tomography for screening for coronary artery disease? [discussion on controversies in cardiovascular medicine]. Noninvasive screening for coronary artery disease with computed tomography is not useful. Circulation 2006;113:125-146.
12. Lawler LP, Pannu HK, Fishman EK. MDCT evaluation of the coronary arteries, 2004: how we do it - data acquisition, postprocessing, display, and interpretation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005:184:1402-1412.
13. Berman DS, Hachamovitch R, Shaw LJ, et al. Roles of nuclear cardiology, cardiac computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance: assessment of patients with suspected coronary artery disease. J Nucl Med 2006;47:74-82.
14. White CS, Kuo D, Kelemen M, et al. Chest pain evaluation in the emergency department: can MDCT provide a comprehensive evaluation? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;185:533-540.
15. Hoffmann U, Nagurney JT, Moselewski F, et al. Coronary multidetector computed tomography in the assessment of patients with acute chest pain. Circulation 2006;114:2251-2260.
16. Hendel RC, Patel MR, Kramer CM, et al. ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/ SCAI/SIR appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:000-000.
17. De Roos A, Kroft LJM, Bax JJ, Lamb HJ, Geleijns J. Cardiac applications of multislice computed tomography. Br J Radiol 2006;79:9-16.
18. Dewey M. Laule M, Krug L, et al. Multisegment and halfscan reconstruction of 16-slice computed tomography for detection of coronary artery stenoses. Invest Radiol 2004;39:223-229.
19. Cademartiri F, Mollet NR, Van der Lugt A, et al. Intravenous contrast material administration at helical 16-detector row CT coronary angiography: effect of iodine concentration on vascular attenuation. Radiology 2005;236:661-665.
20. Jakobs TF, Becker CR, Ohnesorge B, et al. Multislice helical CT of the heart with retrospective ECG gating:reduction of radiation exposure by ECG-controlled tube current modulation. Eur Radiol 2002:12:1081-1086.
21. Schuijf JD, Bax JJ, Jukema JW, et al. Feasibility of assessment of coronary stent patency using 16-slice computed tomography. Am J Cardiol 2004;94:427-430.
22. Seifarth H, Ozgun M, Raupach R, et al. 64- versus 16-slice CT angiography for coronary artery stent assessment. Invest Radiol 2006;41:22-27.
23. Van Mieghem CAG, Cademartiri F, Mollet NR, et al. Multislice spiral computed tomography for the evaluation of stent patency after left main coronary artery stenting: a comparison with conventional coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. Circulation 2006;114:645-653.
24. Nieman K, Rensing BJ, Van Geuns RJ, et al. Usefulness of multislice computed tomography for detecting obstructive coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 2002;89:913-918.
25. Nieman K, Cademartiri F, Lemos PA, et al. Reliable non-invasive coronary angiography with fast submillimeter multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 2002;106:2051-2054.
26. Ropers D, Baum U, Pohle K, et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses with thin-slice multidetector row spiral computed tomography and multiplanar reconstruction. Circulation 2003;107:664-666.
27. Schuijf JD, Bax JJ. Shaw LJ. et al. Meta-analysis of comparative diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging and multi-slice computed tomography for non-invasive coronary angiography. Am Heart J 2006;151:404-411.
28. Dewey M, Teige F, Schnapauff D, et al. Noninvasive detection of coronary artery stenoses with multislice computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Intern Med 2006;145:407-415.
29. Leber AW, Knez A, von Ziegler F, et al. Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:147-154.
30. Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A, et al. Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. Eur Heart J 2005;26:1482-1487.
31. Mollet N, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem C, et al. High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 2005;112:2318-2323.
32. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW, Goldstein JA. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005:46:552-557.
33. Fine JJ, Hopkins CB, Ruff N, Newton FC. Comparison of accuracy of 64-slice cardiovascular computed tomography with coronary angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 2006;97:173-174.
34. Ropers D, Rixe J, Anders K, et al. Usefulness of multidetector row spiral computed tomography with 64- x 0.6-mm collimation and 330-ms rotation for the noninvasive detection of significant coronary artery stenoses. Am J Cardiol 2006;97:343-348.
35. Christian TF. Anatomy of an emerging diagnostic test. Computed tomographic coronary angiography. Circulation 2005:112:2222-2225.
36. Achenbach S, Ropers D, Hoffmann U, et al. Assessment of coronary remodeling in stenotic and nonstenotic coronary atherosclerotic lesions by multidetector spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004:43:842-847.
37. Cury RC, Pomerantsev EV, Ferencik M, et al. Comparison of the degree of coronary stenoses by multidetector computed tomography versus by quantitative coronary angiography. Am J Cardiol 2005;96:784-787.
38. Achenbach S, Daniel WG. Computed tomography of the coronary arteries [editorial comment]. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:155-157.
39. Salm LP, Bax JJ, Jukema JW, et al. Comprehensive assessment of patients after coronary artery bypass grafting by 16-detector-row computed tomography. Am Heart J 2005;150:775-781.
40. Ropers D, Pohle FK, Kuettner A, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography in patients after bypass surgery using 64-slice spiral computed tomography with 330-ms gantry rotation. Circulation 2006;114:2334-2341.
41. Juergens KU, Fischbach R. Left ventricular function studied with MDCT. Eur Radiol 2006;16:342-357.
42. Dirksen MS, Bax JJ, de Roos A, et al. Usefulness of dynamic multislice computed tomography of left ventricular function in unstable angina pectoris and comparison with echocardiography. Am J Cardiol 2002;90:1157-1160.
43. Juergens KU, Grade M, Maintz D, et al. Multidetector row CT of left ventricular function with dedicated analysis software versus MR imaging: initial experience. Radiology 2004;230:403-410.
44. Pattynama PMT. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of the heart. Masters thesis, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands, 1994.
45. Schuijf JD, Bax JJ, Salm LP, et al. Noninvasive coronary imaging and assessment of left ventricular function using 16-slice computed tomography. Am J Cardiol 2005;95:571-574.
46. Dirksen MS, Jukema JW, Bax JJ, et al. Cardiac multidetector-row computed tomography in patients with unstable angina. Am J Cardiol 2005;95:457-461.
47. Schuijf JD, Bax JJ, Jukema JW, et al. Noninvasive angiography and assessment of left ventricular function using multislice computed tomography in patient with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2004:27:2905-2910.
48. Schuijf JD, Bax JJ, Jukema W, et al. Noninvasive evaluation of the coronary arteries with multislice computed tomography in hypertensive patients. Hypertension 2005;45:1-6.
49. Kim RJ. Elliott MD, Judd RM. Assessment of myocardial viability by contrast enhancement. In: Higgins CB, De Roos A, editors. MRI and CT of the cardiovascular system. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 2006. p 233-262.
50. Higgins CB, Sovak M, Schmidt W, Siemers PT. Uptake of contrast materials by experimental acute myocardial infarctions: a preliminary report. Invest Radiol 1978;13:337-339.
51. Higgins CB, Sovak M, Schmidt W, Siemers PT. Differential accumulation of radiopaque contrast material in acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1979;43:47-51.
52. Higgins CB, Siemers PT, Schmidt W, Newell JD. Evaluation of myocardial ischemic damage of various ages by computerized transmission tomography. Time-dependent effects of contrast material. Circulation 1979;60:284-291.
53. Hoffman U, Millea R, Enzweiler C, et al. Acute myocardial infarction: contrast-enhanced multi-detector row CT in a porcine model. Radiology 2004;231:697-701.
54. Paul JF, Wartski M, Caussin C, et al. Late defect on delayed contrast-enhance multi-detector row CT scans in the prediction of SPECT infarct size after reperfused acute myocardial infarction: initial experience. Radiology 2005;236:485-489.
55. Lardo AC, Cordeiro MAS, Silva C, et al. Contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography viability imaging after myocardial infarction: characterization of myocyte death, microvascular obstruction, and chronic scar. Circulation 2006; 113:394-404.
56. Bleeker GB, Kaandorp TAM, Lamb HJ, et al. Effect of posterolateral scar tissue on clinical and echocardiographic improvement after cardiac resynchronization therapy. Circulation 2006;113:969-976.
57. Geleijns J, Kroft LJM, Bax JJ, Lamb HJ, De Roos A. Techniques for cardiovascular computed tomography. In: Higgins CB, De Roos A, editors. MRI and CT of the cardiovascular system. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 2006. p 37-52.
58. Flohr TG, McCollough CH, Bruder H, et al. First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system. Eur Radiol 2006:16:256-268.
59. Funabashi N, Mizuno N, Yoshida K, et al. Superiority of synchrony of 256-slice cone beam computed tomography for acquiring pulsating objects. Comparison with conventional multislice computed tomography. Int J Cardiol (in press).
60. ICRP Publication 60. 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press; 1991.
61. UNSCEAR, United Nations Scientific Committee on the effects of atomic radiation. Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. Volume 1: Sources. 2000.
62. Nair MK, Nambi KS, Amma NS, et al. Population study in the high natural background radiation area in Kerala, India. Radiat Res 1999;152(6 Suppl):S145-S148.