Vertical misft of laser-sintered and vacuum-cast implant-supported crown copings luted with definitive and temporary luting agents

Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2012, Pages

  Castillo de Oyagüe, Raquel ^a   Sánchez Turrión, Andrés ^a   López Lozano, José Francisco ^a   Albaladejo, Alberto ^b   Torres Lagares, Daniel ^c   Montero, Javier ^b   Suárez García, Maria Jesús ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SALAMANCA   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SEVILLE   (Spain)

Author keywords

Dental alloy; Implant supported prostheses; Laser sintering; Vertical discrepancy; Vertical misft

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID; CHROMIUM; COBALT; GLASS IONOMER; RESIN CEMENT; TOOTH CEMENT; URETHAN;

ARTICLE; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTURE; EVALUATION; LASER; MICROTECHNOLOGY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; VACUUM; DENTAL ABUTMENT;

CROWNS; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL IMPLANT-ABUTMENT DESIGN; LASERS; VACUUM;

EID: 84863889495     PISSN: 16984447     EISSN: 16986946     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4317/medoral.17997     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Sahin S, Cehreli MC. The significance of passive framework ft in implant prosthodontics: current status. Implant Dent. 2001;10:85-92.
2. Abt E. Growing body of evidence on survival rates of implant-supported fixed prostheses. Evid Based Dent. 2008;9:51-52.
3. Karl M, Winter W, Taylor TD, Heckmann SM. In vitro study on passive ft in implant-supported 5-unit fxed partial dentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19:30-37.
4. Wataha JC. Alloys for prosthodontic restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87:351-363.
5. Roach M. Base metal alloys used for dental restorations and implants. Dent Clin North Am. 2007;51:603-627.
6. Ucar Y, Akova T, Akyil MS, Brantley WA. Internal ft evaluation of crowns prepared using a new dental crown fabrication technique: laser-sintered Co-Cr crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 2009;102:253-259.
7. Akova T, Ucar Y, Tukay A, Balkaya MC, Brantley WA. Comparison of the bond strength of laser-sintered and cast base metal dental alloys to porcelain. Dent Mater. 2008;24:1400-1404.
8. Oyagüe RC, Turrión AS, Toledano M, Monticelli F, Osorio R. In vitro vertical misft evaluation of cast frameworks for cement-retained implant-supported partial prostheses. J Dent. 2009;37:52-58.
9. Jang KS, Youn SJ, Kim YS. Comparison of castability and surface roughness of commercially pure titanium and cobalt-chromium denture frameworks. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;86:93-98.
10. Quante K, Ludwig K, Kern M. Marginal and internal ft of metal-ceramic crowns fabricated with a new laser melting technology. Dent Mater. 2008;24:1311-1315.
11. Örtorp A, Jönsson D, Mouhsen A, Vult von Steyern P. The fit of cobalt-chromium three-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated with four different techniques: a comparative in vitro study. Dent Mater. 2011; 27:356-363.
12. Sorensen JA. A standardized method for determination of crown margin fdelity. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;64:18-24.
13. Pan YH, Ramp LC, Lin CK, Liu PR. Retention and leakage of implant-supported restorations luted with provisional cement: a pilot study. J Oral Rehabil. 2007;34:206-212.
14. Guichet DL, Caputo AA, Choi H, Sorensen JA. Passivity of ft and marginal opening in screw- or cement-retained implant fixed partial denture designs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000;15:239-246.
15. De Munck J, Vargas M, Van Landuyt K, Hikita K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Bonding of an auto-adhesive luting material to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater. 2004;20:963-971.
16. Yoshida K, Tsuo Y, Meng X, Atsuta M. Mechanical properties of dual-cured resin luting agents for ceramic restoration. J Prosthodont. 2007;16:370-376.
17. Bedi A, Michalakis KX, Hirayama H, Stark PC. The effect of different investment techniques on the surface roughness and irregularities of gold-palladium alloy castings. J Prosthet Dent. 2008;99:282-286.
18. Rodrigues RC, Faria AC, Orsi IA, Mattos Mda G, Macedo AP, Ri-beiro R F. Comparative study of two commercially pure titanium casting methods. J Appl Oral Sci. 2010;18:487-492.
19. Eliopoulos D, Zinelis S, Papadopoulos T. Porosity of cpTi casting with four different casting machines. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;92:377-381.
20. Jemt T. Three-dimensional distortion of gold-alloy castings and welded titanium frameworks. Measurements of the precision of ft between completed implant prostheses and the master casts in routine edentulous situations. J Oral Rehabil. 1995;22:557-564.
21. Lombardas P, Carbunaru A, McAlarney ME, Toothaker RW. Dimensional accuracy of castings produced with ringless and metal ring investment systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;84:27-31.
22. Keith SE, Miller BH, Woody RD, Higginbottom FL. Marginal discrepancy of screw-retained and cemented metal-ceramic crowns on implants abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999;14:369-378.
23. Gonzalo E, Suárez MJ, Serrano B, Lozano JF. A comparison of the marginal vertical discrepancies of zirconium and metal ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses before and after cementation. J Prosthet Dent. 2009;102:378-384.
24. Holmes JR, Bayne SC, Holland GA, Sulik WD. Considerations in measurement of marginal ft. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;62:405-408.
25. Schneider R, de Goes MF, Henriques GE, Chan DC. Tensile bond strength of dual curing resin-based cements to commercially pure titanium. Dent Mater. 2007;23:81-87.
26. Calderini A, Maiorana C, Garlini G, Abbondanza T. A simplifed method to assess precision of ft between framework and supporting implants: a preliminary study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 20 0 7; 22:831-838.
27. Bottino MA, Valandro LF, Buso L, Ozcan M. The influence of cervical fnish line, internal relief, and cement type on the cervical adaptation of metal crowns. Quintessence Int. 2007;38:425-432.
28. Xie D, Brantley WA, Culbertson BM, Wang G. Mechanical properties and microstructures of glass-ionomer cements. Dent Mater. 2000;16:129-138.
29. White SN, Yu Z, Kipnis V. Effect of seating force on flm thickness of new adhesive luting agents. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;68:476-481.
30. Jemt T. Failures and complications in 391 consecutively inserted fixed prostheses supported by Branemark implants in edentulous jaws: a study of treatment from the time of prosthesis placement to the first annual checkup. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1991;6:270-276.