Is confidence of mammographic assessment a good predictor of accuracy?

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 199, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Geller, Berta M ^a   Bogart, Andy ^b   Carney, Patricia A ^c   Elmore, Joann G ^d   Monsees, Barbara S ^e   Miglioretti, Diana L ^b,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT   (United States)

^b GROUP HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^e WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Confidence; Mammography; Radiologist performance; Screening

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER SCREENING; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MEDICAL EXPERT; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; NORMAL HUMAN; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PREDICTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST ATTITUDE; RESIDENCY EDUCATION; SELF EVALUATION; SELF REPORT; TUMOR VOLUME;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MAMMOGRAPHY; POPULATION SURVEILLANCE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RADIOLOGY; REFERENCE STANDARDS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 84863652819     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: 15463141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.11.7701     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Duijm L, Louwman M, Groenewoud J, et al. Inter-observer variability in mammography screening and effect of type and number of readers on screening outcome. Br J Cancer 2009; 100:901-907
2. Saunders RS, Samei E. Improving mammographic decision accuracy by incorporating observer ratings with interpretation time. Br J Radiol 2006; 79(spec no 2):S117-S122 (Pubitemid 46151855)
3. Beam C, Layde P, Sullivan D. Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by US radiologists: findings from a national sample. Arch Intern Med 1996; 156:209-213 (Pubitemid 26024757)
4. Buist D, Anderson M, Haneuse S, et al. Influence of annual interpretive volume on screening mammography performance in the United States. Radiology 2011; 259:72-84
5. Tchou PM, Haygood TM, Atkinson EN, et al. Interpretation time of computer aided-detection at screening mammography. Radiology 2010; 257:40-46
6. Haygood TM, Wang J, Atkinson EN, et al. Timed efficiency of interpretation of digital and film-screen screening mammograms. AJR 2009; 192:216-220
7. Berns EA, Hendrick RE, Solari M, et al. Digital and screen-film mammography: comparison of image acquisition and interpretation times. AJR 2006; 187:38-41 (Pubitemid 46100142)
8. Ishlyama M, Tsunoda-Shimizu H, Kikuchi M, Saida Y, Hiramatsu S. Comparison of reading time between screen-film mammography and soft-copied full-field digital mammography. Breast Cancer 2009; 16:58-61
9. Carney PA, Geller BM, Moffett H, et al. Current medico-legal and confidentiality issues in large multi-center research programs. Am J Epidemiol 2000; 152:371-378 (Pubitemid 30626730)
10. Feig S. Adverse effects of screening mammography. Radiol Clin North Am 2004; 42:807-819 (Pubitemid 39165064)
11. Luo P, Eikman E, Kealy W, et al. Analysis of a mammography teaching program based on an affordance design model. Acad Radiol 2006; 13: 1542-1552 (Pubitemid 44809998)
12. Antonoff M, Shelstad R, Schmitz C, et al. A novel critical skills curriculum for surgical interns incorporating simulation training improves readiness for acute inpatient care. J Surg Educ 2009; 66:248-254
13. Millington S, Wong R, Kassen B, et al. Improving internal medicine residents' performance, knowledge, and confidence in central venous catheterization using simulators. J Hosp Med 2009; 4: 410-416
14. Burke J, Fayaz S, Graham K, et al. Peer-assisted learning in the acquisition of clinical skills: a supplementary approach to musculoskeletal system training. Med Teach 2007; 29:577-582 (Pubitemid 350056034)
15. Nietert P, Ravenel J, Taylor K, et al. Influence of nodule detection software on radiologists' confidence in identifying pulmonary nodules with computed tomography. J Thorac Imaging 2011; 26:48-53
16. Peña BM, Taylor G. Radiologists' confidence in interpretation of sonography and CT in suspected pediatric appendicitis. AJR 2000; 175:71-74 (Pubitemid 30415540)
17. Carney PA, Bogart TA, Geller BM, et al. Association between time spent interpreting, level of confidence, and accuracy of screening mammography. AJR 2012; 198:970-978
18. National Cancer Institute: Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium Website. Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. breastscreening.cancer.gov. Updated January 27, 2012. Accessed March 9, 2012
19. Højsgaard S, Halekoh U, Yan J. The R Package geepack for generalized estimating equations. J Stat Software 2005; 15:1-11
20. Straus SE, Tetroe J, Graham I. Defining knowledge translation. CMAJ 2009; 181:3-4
21. D'Orsi C, Bassett L, Berg WA, et al. ACR BI-RADS-Breast Imaging Atlas, 4th ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2003
22. McNutt L, Wu C, Xue X, et al. Estimating the relative risk in cohort studies and clinical trials of common outcomes. Am J Epidemiol 2003; 157: 940-943 (Pubitemid 36555054)
23. Kundel HL, Nodine CF, Conant EF, Weinstein SP. Holistic component of image perception in mammogram interpretation: gaze-tracking study. Radiology 2007; 242:396-402 (Pubitemid 46146192)
24. Mello-Thoms C, Dunn S, Nodine CF, Kundel HL, Weinstein SP. The perception of breast cancer: what differentiates missed from reported cancers in mammography? Acad Radiol 2002; 9:1004-1012 (Pubitemid 34984674)
25. Diggle P, Heagerty P, Liang K, et al. The analysis of longitudinal data, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2002
26. R Development Core Team R. A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2011
27. Taylor J. Predicting athletic performance with self-confidence and somatic and cognitive anxiety as a function of motor and physiological requirements in six sports. J Pers 1987; 3:1-15
28. Mahoney M, Avener M. Psychology of the elite athlete: an exploratory study. Cognit Ther Res 1977; 1:135-141
29. Bandura A. Self-efficacy towards a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 1977; 84: 191-215
30. Joffe S, Burak J, Rackson M, et al. The effect of international teleradiology attending radiologist coverage on radiology residents' perceptions of night call. J Am Coll Radiol 2006; 3:872-878 (Pubitemid 44636376)