Adverse effects of screening mammography

Radiologic Clinics of North America

Volumn 42, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 807-819

  Feig, Stephen A ^a  

^a MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGE DISTRIBUTION; ANXIETY; ASPIRATION BIOPSY; BREAST CARCINOMA; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; COMPRESSION; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GENDER; HUMAN; IMAGING SYSTEM; MAMMOGRAPHY; PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGY; RADIATION EXPOSURE; RADIATION HAZARD; REVIEW; RISK FACTOR; SCREENING;

EID: 4444295767     PISSN: 00338389     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2004.06.013     Document Type: Article

References (125)

1. S.W. Duffy, L. Tabar, H.-H. Chen, M. Holmqvist, M.-F. Yen, and S. Abdsalah The impact of organized mammography service screening on breast cancer mortality in seven Swedish counties: a collaborative evaluation Cancer 95 2002 458 469
2. S.A. Feig Effect of service screening mammography on population mortality from breast carcinoma Cancer 95 2002 451 457
3. S.A. Feig Mammography equipment: principles, features, and selection Radiol Clin North Am 255 1987 897 911
4. S.A. Feig Screening mammography: effect of image quality on clinical outcome AJR Am J Roentgenol 178 2002 805 807
5. P.C. Stomper, D.B. Kopans, N.L. Sadowsky, M.R. Sonnenfeld, C.A. Swann, and R.S. Gelman Is mammography painful? A multicenter patient study Arch Intern Med 148 1988 521 524
6. V.P. Jackson, A.M. Lex, and D.J. Smith Patient discomfort during screen-film mammography Radiology 168 1988 421 423
7. American College of Radiology Mammography quality control manual 1999 American College of Radiology Reston (VA)
8. D.R. Rutter, M. Calnan, M.S.B. Vaile, S. Field, and K.A. Wade Discomfort and pain during mammography: description, prediction, and prevention BMJ 305 1992 443 445
9. S.A. Feig Economic challenges in breast imaging: a survivor's guide to success Radiol Clin North Am 38 2000 843 852
10. L.J.W. Burhenne, T.G. Hislop, and H.J. Burhenne The British Columbia mammography screening program: evaluation of the first 15 months AJR Am J Roentgenol 158 1992 45 49
11. M.N. Linver, S. Paster, R.D. Rosenberg, C.R. Key, C.A. Stidley, and W.V. King Improvement in mammography interpretation skills in a community radiology practice after dedicated teaching courses: 2-year medical audit of 38,633 cases Radiology 184 1992 39 43
12. C.L. Robertson A private breast imaging practice: medical audit of 25,788 screening and 1,077 diagnostic examinations Radiology 187 1993 75 79
13. E.A. Sickles, S.H. Ominsky, R.A. Sollitto, H.B. Galvin, and D.L. Monticciolo Medical audit of a rapid-throughput mammography screening practice: methodology and results of 27,114 examinations Radiology 175 1990 323 327
14. R.E. Bird Low-cost screening mammography: report on finances and review of 21,716 consecutive cases Radiology 171 1989 87 90
15. Quality Determinants of Mammography Guideline Panel Quality determinants of mammography 1994 US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service Rockville (MD)
16. ACR BI-RADS Committee Breast imaging reporting and data system: mammography 4th edition 2003 American College of Radiology Reston (VA)
17. K.A. Hunt, E.L. Rosen, and E.A. Sickles Outcome analysis for women undergoing annual versus biennial screening mammography: a review of 24,211 examinations AJR Am J Roentgenol 173 1999 285 289
18. B.C. Yankaskas, R.J. Cleveland, M.J. Schell, and R. Kozar Association of recall rates with sensitivity and positive predictive values of screening mammography AJR Am J Roentgenol 177 2001 543 549
19. O. Gur, J.H. Sumkin, L.A. Hardesty, R.J. Clearfield, C.S. Cohen, and M.A. Ganott Recall and detection rates in screening mammography: a review of clinical experience-implications for practice guidelines Cancer 100 2004 1590 1594
20. J.G. Elmore, D.L. Miglioretti, L.M. Reisch, M.B. Barton, W. Kreuter, and C.L. Christiansen Screening mammograms by community radiologists: variability in false-positive rates J Natl Cancer Inst 94 2002 1373 1380
21. L.L. Fajardo, B.J. Hillman, and C. Frey Correlation between breast parenchymal patterns and mammographers certainty of diagnosis Invest Radiol 23 1988 505 508
22. M.B. Laya, J.C. Gallagher, J.S. Schreiman, E.B. Larson, P. Watson, and L. Weinstein Effect of postmenopausal hormonal replacement therapy on mammographic density and parenchymal pattern Radiology 196 1995 433 437
23. M.B. Laya, E.B. Larson, S.H. Taplin, and E. White Effect of estrogen replacement therapy on the specificity and sensitivity of screening mammography J Natl Cancer Inst 88 1996 643 649
24. C.L. Christiansen, F. Wang, M.B. Barton, W. Kreuter, J.G. Elmore, and A.E. Gelfand Predicting the risk of false-positive mammograms J Natl Cancer Inst 92 2000 1657 1666
25. J.G. Elmore, M.B. Barton, V.M. Moceri, S. Polk, P.J. Arena, and S.W. Fletcher Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations N Engl J Med 338 1998 1089 1096
26. Feig S.A. A perspective on false positive screening mammograms. ACR Bulletin 1998;54:8,13
27. M. Brown, F. Houn, E.A. Sickles, and L.G. Kessler Screening mammography in community practice: positive predictive value of abnormal findings and yield of follow-up diagnostic procedures AJR Am J Roentgenol 165 1995 1373 1377
28. J.G. Elmore, C.Y. Nakano, T.D. Koepsell, L.M. Desnick, C.J. D'Orsi, and D.F. Ransohoff International variation in screening mammography interpretations in community-based programs J Natl Cancer Inst 95 2003 1384 1393
29. R. Smith-Bindman, P.W. Chu, D.L. Miglioretti, E.A. Sickles, R. Blanks, and R. Ballard-Barbash Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United Kingdom JAMA 290 2003 2129 2137
30. M. Moskowitz Retrospective reviews of breast cancer screening: what do we really learn from them? Radiology 199 1996 615 620
31. R. Smith-Bindman, and K. Kerlikowske Optimal recall rates following mammography [letter to the editor] JAMA 291 2004 821 822
32. M. Sant, C. Allemani, F. Berrino, M.P. Coleman, T. Aareleid, and G. Chaplain Breast carcinoma survival in Europe and the United States: a population- based study Cancer 100 2004 715 722
33. PIAA Breast Cancer Committee Breast cancer study 2002 Physician Insurers Association of America Washington
34. D.R. Enzmann, P.M. Anglada, C. Haviley, and L.A. Venta Providing professional mammography services: financial analysis Radiology 219 2001 467 473
35. D.B. Kopans The positive predictive value of mammography AJR Am J Roentgenol 158 1992 521 526
36. D.B. Kopans, R.H. Moore, K.A. McCarthy, D.A. Hall, C.A. Hulka, and G.J. Whitman Positive predictive value of breast biopsy performed as a result of mammography: there is no abrupt change at age 50 years Radiology 200 1996 357 360
37. E.A. Sickles Auditing your practice D.B. Kopans E.B. Mendelson Syllabus: a categorical course in breast imaging 1995 Radiological Society of North America Oak Brook (IL) 81 91
38. M.N. Linver, and S.B. Paster Mammography outcomes in a practice setting by age: prognostic factors, sensitivity, and positive biopsy rate Monogr Natl Cancer Inst 33 1997 113 117
39. E.A. Sickles Successful methods to reduce false-positive mammography interpretations Radiol Clin North Am 38 2000 693 700
40. S. Ciatto, L. Cataliotti, and V. Distante Nonpalpable lesions detected with mammography: review of 512 consecutive cases Radiology 165 1987 99 102
41. J.E. Meyer, M.R. Sonnenfeld, R.A. Greenes, and P.C. Stomper Cancellation of preoperative breast localization procedures: analysis of 53 cases Radiology 169 1988 629 630
42. G. Svane, E.J. Potchen, A. Siera, and E. Azavedo Screening mammography: breast cancer diagnosis in asymptomatic women 1993 Mosby St Louis
43. E.D. Pisano, L. Fajardo, D.J. Caudry, N. Sneige, W.J. Frable, and W.A. Berg Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions in a Group V Radiology 219 2001 785 792
44. S.H. Parker, and W.E. Jobe Percutaneous breast biopsy 1993 Raven Press New York
45. L. Ries, M.P. Eisner, C. Kosary, B. Hankey, B.A. Miller, and L.X. Clegg SEER cancer statistics review, 1975-2000 2003 National Cancer Institute Bethseda (MD)
46. S. Shapiro, W. Venet, P. Strax, and L. Venet Periodic screening for breast cancer: the Health Insurance Plan Project and its Sequelae, 1963-1986 1988 Johns Hopkins University Press Baltimore
47. R.A. Smith, D. Saslow, K.A. Sawyer, W. Burke, M.E. Costanza, and W.P. Evans American Cancer Society Guidelines for Breast Cancer Screening: update 2003 CA Cancer J Clin 53 2003 141 169
48. S.A. Feig Increased benefit from shorter screening mammography intervals for women ages 40-49 years Cancer 80 1997 2035 2039
49. R.E. Hendrick, R.A. Smith, J.H. Rutledge III, and C.R. Smart Benefit of screening mammography in women aged 40-49: a new meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Monogr Natl Cancer Inst 33 1997 87 92
50. K.C. Chu, C.R. Smart, and R.E. Tarone Analysis of breast cancer mortality and stage distribution by age for the Health Insurance Plan clinical trial J Natl Cancer Inst 80 1998 1125 1132
51. N. Bjurstam, L. Bjorneld, and S.W. Duffy The Gothenburg Breast Screening Trial: first results on mortality, incidence, and mode of detection for women ages 39-49 years at randomization Cancer 20 1997 2091 2099
52. I. Andersson, and L. Janzon Reduced breast cancer mortality in women under 50: updated results from the Malmo Mammographic Screening Program Monogr Natl Cancer Inst 22 1997 63 68
53. L. Tabar, M.-F. Yen, B. Vitak, H.-H.T. Chen, R.A. Smith, and S.W. Duffy Mammography service screening and mortality in breast cancer patients: 20-year follow-up before and after the introduction of screening Lancet 361 2003 1405 1410
54. S.A. Feig Age-related accuracy of screening mammography: how should it be measured? Radiology 214 2000 633 640
55. K. Kerlikowske, D. Grady, J. Barclay, E.A. Sickles, A. Eaton, and V. Ernster Positive predictive value of screening mammography by age and family history of breast cancer JAMA 270 1993 2444 2450
56. V.L. Ernster, R. Ballard-Barbash, W.E. Barlow, Y. Zheng, D.L. Weaver, and G. Cutter Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography J Natl Cancer Inst 94 2002 1546 1554
57. C.R. Smart, C. Byrne, R.A. Smith, L. Garfinkel, A.H. Letton, and G.D. Dodd Twenty-year follow-up of breast cancers diagnosed during the Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project CA Cancer J Clin 47 1997 134 149
58. M. Silverstein Non-invasive breast cancer: the dilemma of the 1990s Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 21 1994 639 658
59. F.L. Ernster, J. Barclay, K. Kerlikowske, D. Grady, and I.C. Henderson Incidence and treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast JAMA 275 1996 913 918
60. S.W. Fletcher Why question screening mammography for women in their forties? Radiol Clin North Am 33 1995 1259 1272
61. R. Harris Variation of benefits and harms of breast cancer screening with age Monogr Natl Cancer Inst 22 1997 139 145
62. V.L. Ernster, and J. Barclay Increases in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast in relation to mammography: a dilemma Monogr Natl Cancer Inst 22 1997 151 156
63. S.A. Feig Ductal carcinoma in situ: implications for screening mammography Radiol Clin North Am 38 2000 653 668
64. B. Cady How to prevent invasive breast cancer: detect and excise duct carcinoma in situ J Surg Oncol 69 1998 60 62
65. M. Nielsen, J. Jensen, and J. Andersen Precancerous and cancerous breast lesions during lifetime and at autopsy: a study of 83 women Cancer 54 1984 612 615
66. M. Nielsen, J.L. Thomsen, S. Primdahl, U. Dyreborg, and J.A. Andersen Breast cancer and atypia among young and middle-aged women: a study of 110 medicolegal autopsies Br J Cancer 56 1987 814 819
67. S.A. Bartow, D.R. Pathak, W.C. Black, C.R. Key, and S.R. Teaf Prevalence of benign, atypical, and malignant breast lesions in populations at different risk for breast cancer Cancer 60 1987 2751 2760
68. S.A. Bartow, D.R. Pathak, and F.A. Mettler Radiographic microcalcification and parenchymal patterns as indicators of histologic "high risk" benign breast disease Cancer 66 1990 1721 1725
69. D.L. Page, W.D. Dupont, L.W. Rogers, and M.S. Rados Atypical hyperplastic lesions of the female breast: a long follow-up study Cancer 55 1985 2698 2708
70. W.D. Dupont, and D.L. Page Risk factors for breast cancer in women with proliferative breast disease N Engl J Med 312 1985 146 151
71. S.R. Wellings, H.M. Jensen, and R.G. Marcum An atlas of subgross pathology of the human breast with special reference to precancerous lesions J Natl Cancer Inst 55 1975 231 273
72. W.L. Betsill, P.P. Rosen, P.H. Lieberman, and G.F. Robbins Intraductal carcinoma: long-term follow-up after treatment by biopsy alone JAMA 239 1978 1863 1867
73. D.L. Page, L.W. Rogers, P.A. Schuyler, W.D. Dupont, and R.A. Jensen The natural history of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast M.J. Silverstein A. Recht M.D. Lagios Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast 2nd edition 2002 Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins Philadelphia 17 21
74. P.P. Rosen The clinical significance of pre-invasive breast cancer Cancer 46 1980 919 925
75. D.L. Page, W.D. Dupont, L.W. Rogers, and M. Landenberger Intraductal carcinoma of the breast: follow-up after biopsy only Cancer 49 1982 751 758
76. D.L. Page, W.D. Dupont, L.W. Rogers, R.A. Jensen, and P.A. Schuyler Continued local recurrence of carcinoma 15-25 years after a diagnosis of low grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast treated only by biopsy Cancer 76 1995 1197 1200
77. R. Fonseca, L.C. Hartmann, I.A. Peterson, J.H. Donohue, T.B. Crotty, and J.J. Gisvold Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast Ann Intern Med 127 1997 1013 1022
78. J.M. Dixon, and D.L. Page Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast Breast 7 1998 239 242
79. S.A. Feig, G.F. Schwartz, R. Nerlinger, and J. Edeiken Prognostic factors of breast neoplasms detected on screening by mammography and physical examination Radiology 133 1979 577 582
80. K.L. Carlson, M.A. Helvie, M.A. Roubidoux, C.G. Kleer, H.A. Oberman, and T.E. Wilson Relationship between mammographic screening intervals and size and histology of ductal carcinoma in situ AJR Am J Roentgenol 172 1999 313 317
81. M.D. Lagios, P.R. Westdahl, F.R. Margolin, and M.R. Rose Duct carcinoma in situ: relationship of extent of noninvasive disease to the frequency of occult invasion, multicentricity, lymph node metastases, and short-term treatment failures Cancer 50 1982 1309 1314
82. A.S. Patchefsky, G.F. Schwartz, D. Finkelstein, A. Prestipino, S.E. Sohn, and J.S. Singer Heterogeneity of intraductal carcinoma of the breast Cancer 63 1989 731 741
83. M.-F. Yen, L. Tabar, R.A. Smith, H.-H. Chen, and S.W. Duffy Quantifying the potential problem of overdiagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ in breast cancer screening Eur J Cancer 39 2003 1746 1754
84. S.W. Duffy, L. Tabar, B. Vitak, N.E. Day, R.A. Smith, and H.-H.T. Chen The relative contributions of screen-detected in situ and invasive breast carcinoma in reducing mortality from the disease Eur J Cancer 39 2003 1755 1760
85. Rothenberg L.N., Feig S.A., Haus A.G., Hendrick R.E., Howe G.R., McCrohan J.L., et al. A guide to mammography and other breast imaging procedures. NCRP Report No. 72. Bethesda (MD): National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, in press.
86. J.R. Gentry, and L.A. De Werd TLD measurements of in vivo mammographic exposures and the calculated mean glandular dose across the United States Med Phys 23 1996 899 903
87. O.H. Suleiman, D.C. Spelic, J.L. McCrohan, G.R. Symonds, and F. Houn Mammography in the 1990s: the United States and Canada Radiology 210 1999 345 351
88. K.C. Young, and A. Burch Radiation doses received in the UK Breast Screening Programme in 1997 and 1998 Br J Radiol 73 2000 278 287
89. M. Tokunaga, C.E. Land, S. Tokuoka, I. Nishimori, M. Soda, and S. Akiba Incidence of female breast cancer among atomic bomb survivors, 1950-1985 Radiat Res 138 1994 209 223
90. R.E. Shore, N. Hildreth, E.D. Woodard, P. Dvoretsky, L. Hempelmann, and B. Pasternack Breast cancer among women given x-ray therapy for acute postpartum mastitis J Natl Cancer Inst 77 1986 689 696
91. A. Mattson, R. Bengt-Inge, P. Hall, N. Wilking, and L.E. Rutqvist Radiation-induced breast cancer: long-term follow-up of radiation therapy for benign breast disease J Natl Cancer Inst 85 1993 1679 1685
92. J.D. Boice, D. Preston, F.G. Davis, and R.R. Monson Frequent chest x-ray fluoroscopy and breast cancer incidence among tuberculosis patients in Massachusetts Radiat Res 125 1991 214 222
93. G.R. Howe, and J. McLaughlin Breast cancer mortality between 1950 and 1987 after exposure to fractionated moderate-dose-rate ionizing radiation in the Canadian fluoroscopy cohort study and a comparison with breast cancer mortality in the atomic bomb survivors study Radiat Res 145 1996 694 707
94. S.L. Hancock, M.A. Tucker, and R.T. Hoppe Breast cancer after treatment of Hodgkin's disease J Natl Cancer Inst 85 1993 1679 1685
95. S.A. Feig, and R.E. Hendrick Radiation risk from screening mammography of women aged 40-49 years Monogr Natl Cancer Inst 22 1997 119 124
96. S.A. Feig Risk, benefit and controversies in mammographic screening A.G. Haus M.J. Yaffe Physical aspects of breast imaging: current and future considerations. 1999 syllabus, categorical course in radiology physics 1999 Radiological Society of North America Oak Brook (IL) 99 108
97. S.A. Feig Mammographic screening of women age 40-49: benefit, risk, and cost considerations Cancer 76 1995 2097 2106
98. G.R. Howe, G.J. Sherman, R.M. Seminciw, and A.B. Miller Estimated benefits and risks of screening for breast cancer Can Med Assoc J 124 1981 399 403
99. J. Law Cancers induced and cancers detected in a mammography screening programme Br J Radiol 60 1987 231 234
100. J. Law Risk and benefit associated with radiation dose in breast screening programmes: an update Br J Radiol 68 1995 870 876
101. F.A. Mettler, A.C. Upton, C.A. Kelsey, R.N. Ashby, R.D. Rosenberg, and M.N. Linver Benefits versus risks from mammography: a critical reassessment Cancer 77 1996 903 909
102. J.T.M. Jansen, and J. Zoetelief Assessment of lifetime gained as a result of mammographic breast cancer screening using a computer model Br J Radiol 70 1997 619 628
103. P.M.M. Beemsterboer, P.G. Warmerdam, R. Boer, and H.J. de Koning Radiation risk of mammography related to benefit in screening programmes: a favorable balance? J Med Screen 5 1998 81 87
104. H. Jung Mammographic und strahlenrisiko Fortschr Rontgenstr 169 1998 336 343
105. A. Mattsson, W. Leitz, and L.E. Rutqvist Radiation risk and mammographic screening of women from 40 to 49 years of age: effect on breast cancer rates and years of life Br J Cancer 82 2000 220 226
106. D.J. Brenner, S.G. Sawant, M.P. Hande, R.C. Miller, C.D. Elliston, and Z. Fu Routine screening mammography: how important is the radiation-risk side of the benefit-risk equation? Int J Radiat Biol 78 2002 1065 1067
107. M. Frankenberg-Schwager, I. Garg, D. Frankenberg, B. Greve, E. Severin, and D. Uthe Mutagenicity of low-filtered 30 kVp x-rays, mammography x-rays and conventional x-rays in cultured mammalian cells Int J Radiat Biol 78 2002 781 789
108. S.A. Feig Effect of service screening mammography on population mortality from breast carcinoma Cancer 95 2002 451 457
109. S.A. Feig Increased benefit from shorter screening mammography intervals for women age 40-49 years Cancer 80 1997 2035 2039
110. L. Tabar, B. Vitak, H.-H. Chen, M.-F. Yen, S.W. Duffy, and R.A. Smith Beyond randomized controlled trials: organized mammography screening substantially reduces breast cancer mortality Cancer 91 2001 1724 1731
111. O.S. Miettinen, C.I. Henschke, M.W. Pasmantier, J.P. Smith, D.M. Libby, and D.F. Yankelevitz Mammographic screening: no reliable supporting evidence? Lancet 359 2002 401 406
112. A.G. Haus, and M.J. Yaffe Screen-film and digital mammography: image quality and radiation dose considerations Radiol Clin North Am 38 2000 871 898
113. A.R. Bull, and M.J. Campbell Assessment of the psychologic impact of a breast screening programme Br J Radiol 64 1991 510 515
114. B.K. Rimer, and L.G. Bluman The psychologic consequences of mammography Monogr Natl Cancer Inst 22 1997 131 138
115. J.B. Lowe, K.P. Balanda, C. Del Mar, and E. Hawes Psychologic distress in women with abnormal findings in mass mammography screening Cancer 85 1999 1114 1118
116. T.E. Wilson, C. Wallace, M.A. Roubidoux, S.S. Sonnad, D.J. Crowe, and M.A. Helvie Patient satisfaction with screening mammography: online vs off-line interpretation Acad Radiol 5 1998 771 778
117. F.J. Gilbert, C.M. Cordiner, I.R. Affleck, D.B. Hood, D. Mathiesen, and L.G. Walker Breast screening: the psychological sequelae of false-positive recall in women with and without a family history of breast cancer Eur J Cancer 34 1998 2010 2014
118. C. Lerman, B. Trock, B.K. Rimer, A. Boyce, C. Jepson, and P.F. Engstrom Psychological and behavioral implications of abnormal mammograms Ann Intern Med 114 1991 657 661
119. B.V. Currence, E.D. Pisano, J.A. Earp, A. Moore, Y.-F. Chiu, and M.E. Brown Does biopsy, aspiration or six-month follow-up of a false-positive mammogram reduce future screening or have large psychosocial effects? Acad Radiol 10 2003 1257 1266
120. M.G. Barton, D.S. Morley, S. Moore, J.D. Allen, K.P. Kleinman, and K.M. Emmons Decreasing women's anxieties after abnormal mammograms: a controlled trial J Natl Cancer Inst 96 2004 529 538
121. K.K. Lindfors, J. O'Connor, and R.A. Parker False-positive screening mammograms: effect of immediate versus later work-up on patient stress Radiology 218 2001 247 253
122. E.D. Pisano, J.A. Earp, and T.L. Gallant Screening mammography behavior after a false-positive mammogram Cancer Detect Prev 22 1998 161 167
123. P.A. Carney, B.G. Harwood, J.E. Weiss, M.S. Eliassen, and M.E. Goodrich Factors associated with interval adherence to mammography screening in a population-based sample of New Hampshire women Cancer 95 2002 219 227
124. L.M. Schwartz, S. Woloshin, H.C. Sox, B. Fischhoff, and H.G. Welch US women's attitudes to false-positive mammography results and detection of ductal carcinoma in situ: cross sectional survey BMJ 320 2000 1635 1640
125. L.M. Schwartz, S. Woloshin, F.J. Fowler Jr, and H.G. Welch Enthusiasm for cancer screening in the United States JAMA 291 2004 71 78