Comparison of reading time between screen-film mammography and soft-copied, full-field digital mammography

Breast Cancer

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 58-61

  Ishiyama, Mitsutomi ^a   Tsunoda Shimizu, Hiroko ^a   Kikuchi, Mari ^a   Saida, Yukihisa ^a   Hiramatsu, Sonoe ^a  

^a ST LUKE'S INTERNATIONAL HOSPITAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

Full field digital mammography; Screen film mammography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER SCREENING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGE PROCESSING; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PARAMETER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; READING TIME; SCREEN FILM MAMMORAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; MIDDLE AGED; TASK PERFORMANCE; TIME;

ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 59649112365     PISSN: 13406868     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12282-008-0078-4     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. P Skaane K Young A Skjennald 2003 population-based mammography screening: comparison of screen-film and full-field mammography with soft-copy reading-Oslo I study Radiology 229 877 84 (Pubitemid 37467596)
2. P Skaane A Skjennald 2004 Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading: randomized trial in a population-based screening program-Oslo II study Radiology 232 194 204 (Pubitemid 38787838)
3. ED Pisano CA Gatsonis MJ Yaffe RE Hendrick AN Tosteson DG Fryback 2005 American college of radiology imaging network digital mammographic imaging screening trial: objectives and methodology Radiology 236 404 412 (Pubitemid 41023419)
4. ED Pisano EB Cole EO Kistner KE Muller BM Hemminger ML Brown 2002 Interpretation of digital mammograms: comparison of speed and accuracy of soft-copy versus printed-film display Radiology 223 483 488 (Pubitemid 34454330)
5. ED Pisano C Gatsonis E Hendrick M Yaffe JK Baum S Acharyya 2005 Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening N Engl J Med 353 17 1773 1783 (Pubitemid 41549889)
6. S Ciatto B Brancato R Baglioni M Turci 2006 A methodology to evaluate differential costs of full field digital as compared to conventional screen film mammography in a clinical setting Eur J Radiol 57 69 75 (Pubitemid 43075412)
7. H Tsunoda-Shimizu 2006 The current status of digital mammography soft copy diagnosis Jpn J Breast Cancer 21 3 263 9