Science ethics education part II: Changes in attitude toward scientific fraud among medical researchers after a short course in science ethics

Journal of B.U.ON.

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 391-395

  Vuckovic Dekic, Ljiljana ^a   Gavrilovic, D ^a   Kezic, I ^b   Bogdanovic, G ^c   Brkic, S ^d  

^a INSTITUTE FOR ONCOLOGY AND RADIOLOGY OF SERBIA   (Serbia)

^b ID Statsol Statistical Consultants   (Belgium)

^c ONCOLOGY INSTITUTE OF VOJVODINA   (Serbia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NOVI SAD   (Serbia)

Author keywords

Attitude; Education; Ethics; Medicine; Scientific misconduct

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; FRAUD; GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE; MULTIPLE CHOICE TEST; PUNISHMENT; QUESTIONNAIRE; RESEARCH ETHICS; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT;

ATTITUDE; AUTHORSHIP; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; ETHICS, RESEARCH; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; MORALS; PLAGIARISM; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH PERSONNEL; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; STUDENTS; TRUTH DISCLOSURE; WHISTLEBLOWING;

EID: 84863617194     PISSN: 11070625     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Recommendations of the Commission on the professional safe regulation in science. Proposals for safeguarding good scientific practice. Available at: http://www.dfg.de/download/pdf/dfg-im-profil/reden-stellungnahmen/download/ self-regulation-98.pdf (last visited February 15, 2012).
2. Publishing in biomedicine (3rd Edn). Brkić S, Vuč ković-Dekić Lj, Bogdanović G (Eds.). Novi Sad: Ortomedics, 2010 (in Serbian).
3. Todorović Lj, Vučković-Dekić Lj. Communication in biomedical science. Kragujevac: University of Kragujevac Medical Faculty, 2008 (in Serbian, partly in English).
4. Stanojević-Bakić N. Good scientific practice - training, development, and mentoring of the young scientists. Arch Oncol 2001; 9 (Suppl 2): 34-35.
5. Vučković-Dekić Lj, Gavrilović D, Kežić I, Bogdanović G, Brkić S. Science ethics education. Part I. Perception and attitude toward scientific fraud among medical researchers. J BUON 2011; 16: 771-777.
6. Rennie SC, Rudland JR. Differences in medical students ' attitudes to academic misconduct and reported behavior across the years - a questionnaire study. J Med Ethics 2003; 29: 97-102. (Pubitemid 36504105)
7. Plemmons DK, Brody SA, Kalichman MW Student perceptions of the effectiveness of education in the responsible conduct of research. Sci Engin Ethics 2006; 12: 571-582. (Pubitemid 44338008)
8. Olson LE. Developing a framework for assessing responsible conduct of research education programs. Sci Eng Ethics 2010; 16: 185-200.
9. Rhodes R. The pressing need for postdoctoral research ethics education. Am J Bioeth 2002; 2: 1-3.
10. Sharp R. Teaching old dogs new tricks: continuing education in research ethics. Am J Bioeth 2002; 2: 55-56.
11. Hren D, Vujaklija A, Ivanišević R, Knežević J, Marušić M, Marušić A. Students' moral reasoning, Machiavellianism and socially desirable responding: implications for teaching ethics and research integrity. Med Educ 2006; 40: 269-277.
12. Steneck NH. Fostering integrity in research: definitions, current knowledge, and future directions. Sci Eng Ethics 2006; 12: 53-74. (Pubitemid 43242428)
13. Marušić M, Hren D, Roso V, Donev DM, Marušić A. Is mandatory training in research methodology associated with attitudes and knowledge about science in medicine? Survey of Croatian medical interns at license examination over eight years (Letter). Med Teach 2010; 32: 348.
14. Resnik DB. What is Ethics in Research & Why is it Important? Available at: http://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/resources/bioethics/whatis/ (Last visited February 17, 2012).
15. Pupovac V, Bilić-Zulle L, Mavrinac M, Petrovečki M. Attitudes toward plagiarism among pharmacy and medical biochemistry students - cross-sectional survey study. Bioch Med 2010; 20: 307-313.
16. Chalmers I. Role of systematic reviews in detecting plagiarism: case of Asim Kurjak. BMJ 2006; 333: 594-596. (Pubitemid 44433636)
17. Science publishing: How to stop plagiarism. Marušić A, Petrovečki M. Check all manuscripts. Nature 2012; 481 (7379): 21-3. Available at: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v481/n7379/full/481021a. html#/ana-marusic-amp-mladen-petrovecki-check-all-manuscripts (Last visited February 20, 2012).
18. Vučković-Dekić Lj. Plagiarism - How to Deal with It? (Letter to the Editor). Srp Arh Celok Lek 2012; 140: 122.
19. Baždarić K, Bilić-Zulle L, Brumini G, Petrovečki M. Prevalence of Plagiarism in Recent Submissions to the Croatian Medical Journal. Sci Eng Ethics 2011;DOI:h10.1007/s11948-011-9347-2.
20. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to Biomedical Journals. Ethical Considerations in the Conduct and Reporting of Research. Authorship and Contributorship. Available at http//www.icmje.org/ethical-1author.html (Last visited February 20, 2012).
21. Hren D, Sambunjak D, Ivaniš A, Marušić M, Marušić A. Perceptions of authorship criteria: effects of student instruction and scientific experience. J Med Ethics 2007; 33: 428-432.
22. Devlin M. Policy, preparation and prevention: Proactive minimization of student plagiarism. J Higher Educ Policy Manage 2006; 28: 45-58. (Pubitemid 43071204)
23. Bilić-Zulle L, Azman J, Frković V, Petrovečki M. Is there an effective approach to deterring students from plagiarism? Sci Eng Ethics 2008; 14: 139-147.
24. Vujaklija A, Hren D, Sambunjak D et al. Can teaching research methodology influence students' attitude toward science? Cohort study and nonrandomized trial in a single medical school. J Invest Med 2010; 58: 282-286.
25. Arda B. Publication Ethics from the Perspective of PhD Students of Health Sciences: A limited study. Sci Eng Ethics 2011 (in press). Available at: http://www.biyoetik.org.tr/files/Publication%20ethics%20Berna%20Arda%20TR.pdf (Last visited February 20, 2012).