Developing a framework for assessing responsible conduct of research education programs

Science and Engineering Ethics

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 185-200

  Olson, Lynne E ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Compliance; Program evaluation; RCR education

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTINUING EDUCATION; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION; EDUCATIONAL MODEL; ETHICS; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INTERNET; MANDATORY PROGRAM; MEDICAL ETHICS; METHODOLOGY; MOTIVATION; NATIONAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION; NONBIOLOGICAL MODEL; ORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; RESEARCH ETHICS; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

CODES OF ETHICS; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, CONTINUING; ETHICS, RESEARCH; GOALS; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; INTERNET; MANDATORY PROGRAMS; MODELS, EDUCATIONAL; MODELS, ORGANIZATIONAL; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (U.S.); ORGANIZATIONAL OBJECTIVES; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PROFESSIONAL ROLE; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; PROGRAM EVALUATION; RESEARCH SUPPORT AS TOPIC; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES OFFICE OF RESEARCH INTEGRITY;

EID: 77949297411     PISSN: 13533452     EISSN: 16605454     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11948-010-9196-4     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bebeau, M. J. (1993). Designing an outcome-based ethics curriculum for professional education: Strategies and evidence. Journal of Moral Education, 22(3), 313-325.
2. Bebeau, M. J. (1994). The impact of a dental ethics curriculum on moral reasoning. Journal of Dental Education, 58(9), 684-692.
3. Brown, S., & Kalichman, M. W. (1998). Effects of training in the responsible conduct of research: A survey of graduate students in experimental sciences. Science and Engineering Ethics, 4(4), 487-498.
4. Crawford, D. B., Chaffin, C. G., & Scarborough, S. (2001). Effective compliance systems: A practical guide for educational institutions. Altamonte Springs: The Institute of Internal Auditors Research Foundation.
5. Ferrell, O. C., LeClair, D. T., & Ferrell, L. (1998). The federal sentencing guidelines for organizations: A framework for ethical compliance. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 353-363.
6. Grant, G., Guyton, O., & Forrester, R. (1999). Creating effective research compliance programs in academic institutions. Academic Medicine, 74(9), 951-971.
7. Mastroianni, A. C., & Kahn, J. P. (1998). The importance of expanding current training in the responsible conduct of research. Academic Medicine, 73(4), 1249-1254.
8. Newcomer, K. E., Hatry, H. P., & Wholey, J. S. (2004). Meeting the need for practical evaluation approaches: An introduction. In J. S. Wholey, H. P. Hatry, & K. E. Newcomer (Eds.), Handbook of practical program evaluation (p. xxxiv). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9. Poister, T. H. (2004). Performance monitoring. In J. S. Wholey, H. P. Hatry, & K. E. Newcomer (Eds.), Handbook of practical program evaluation (pp. 98-125). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10. Sachs, G. A., & Siegler, M. (1993). Teaching scientific integrity and the responsible conduct of research. Academic Medicine, 68(12), 871-875.
11. Steneck, N. H. (2004). ORI introduction to the responsible conduct of research. Rockville: Office of Research Integrity.
12. U. S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1989). Responsibility of PHS awardee and applicant institutions for dealing with and reporting possible misconduct in science. Title 42. Code of Federal Regulations. Part 50. Subpart A. Retrieved January 20, 2010 from http://ori. dhhs. gov/misconduct/reg_subpart_a. shtml.
13. U. S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1995). Responsibility of applicants for promoting objectivity in research for which PHS funding is sought. Title 42. Code of Federal Regulations. Part 50. Subpart F. Retrieved February 8, 2010 from http://grants. nih. gov/grants/compliance/42_CFR_50_Subpart_F. htm.
14. U. S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2005). Public health service policy on research misconduct. Title 42. Code of Federal Regulations. Parts 50 and 93. Retrieved February 8, 2010 from http://ori. dhhs. gov/documents/42_cfr_parts_50_and_93_2005. pdf.
15. U. S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2009). Protection of human subjects. Title 45. Code of Federal Regulations. Part 46. Retrieved February 8, 2010 from http://www. hhs. gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45CFR46. htm.
16. U. S. National Institutes of Health. (1989). Requirement for programs on the responsible conduct of research in National Research Service Award Institutional Training Programs. NIH Guide to Grants and Contracts, 18(45), 1.
17. U. S. National Institutes of Health. (1993). NIH Revitalization Act of 1993. Plan for use of animals in research. Retrieved November 16, 2009 from http://grants. nih. gov/grants/olaw/pl103-43. pdf.
18. U. S. National Institutes of Health. (2000). Required education in the protection of human research participants. Notice: OD-00-039. Retrieved September 22, 2009 from http://grants. nih. gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-00-039. html.
19. U. S. Office of Inspector General. Department of Health, Human Services. (2003). Solicitation of Information and recommendations for developing compliance program guidance for recipients of NIH research grants. Federal Register, 68(172), 52783.
20. U. S. Public Health Service. (2000). PHS policy on instruction in the responsible conduct of research (RCR)-suspended. Retrieved November 17, 2009 from http://ori. dhhs. gov/policies/RCR_Policy. shtml.
21. U. S. Public Law 99-158. (1985). Health Research Extension Act of 1985 November 20, 1985. Animals in research. Retrieved November 16, 2009 from http://grants. nih. gov/grants/olaw/references/hrea1985. htm.
22. U. S. Sentencing Commission Guidelines Manual. (2007). Sentencing of organizations. Chapter 8. B2. 1. Effective compliance and ethics program. Retrieved November 12, 2009 from http://www. ussc. gov/2007guid/CHAP8. html.
23. Walsh, B. E., Moran, J. W., McDougall, G. J. (2000a). The compliance umbrella. NACUBO Business Officer, January 2000, 18-42.
24. Walsh, B. E., Moran, J. W., McDougall, G. J. (2000b). Operating process. NACUBO Business Officer, March 2000, 43-48.
25. Wholey, J. S. (2004). Evaluability assessment. In J. S. Wholey, H. P. Hatry, & K. E. Newcomer (Eds.), Handbook of practical program evaluation (pp. 33-62). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
26. Worthen, B. R., Sanders, J. R., & Fitzpatrick, J. L. (1997). Program evaluation. Alternative approaches and practical guidelines (pp. 30-33). White Plains: Longman Publishers.