The pressing need for postdoctoral research ethics education

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 2-

  Rhodes, Rosamond ^a  

^a MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85012428356     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/152651602320957691     Document Type: Note

References (10)

1. Anderson, C. 1993a. Scandal scars Minnesota medical school. Science 262:1812-813.
2. Anderson, C., 1993b. Survey tracks misconduct, to an extent. Science 262:1203-1204.
3. Anderson, C., 1994. The aftermath of the Gallo case. Science 263:20-22.
4. Beardsley, T. 1992. Profile: David Baltimore. A troubled homecoming. Scientific American 266(1): 33, 36.
5. Eisen, A., and R. M. Berry. The absent professor: Why we don’t teach research ethics and what to do about it. The American Journal of Bioethics 2(4): 38-49.
6. National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine, Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy. 2000. Enhancing the postdoctoral experience for scientists and engineers. Washington: National Academy Press.
7. Porter, R. 1998. The science police. The New York Times Book Review, 20 September, 9.
8. Shapiro, M. F., and R. P. Charrow. 1985. Scientific misconduct in investigational drug trials. New England Journal of Medicine 312(11): 731-37.
9. Stolberg, S. G. 1999. The biotech death of Jesse Gelsinger. The New York Times Magazine, 28 November, 136-50.
10. Zylke, J.W. 1989. Investigation results in disciplinary action against researchers, retraction of articles. JAMA 262(14): 1910-11, 1915.