The effects of base frequency and affix productivity in Spanish

Spanish Journal of Psychology

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 505-512

  Lopez Villasenor M L ^a  

^a Facultad de Terapia Ocupacional   (Spain)

Author keywords

Affix productivity; Base frequency; Lemma; Morphology

Indexed keywords

EID: 84863493698     PISSN: 11387416     EISSN: 19882904     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5209/rev_SJOP.2012.v15.n2.38861     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Baayen, H., Feldman, L., & Schreuder, R. (2006). Morphological influences on the recognition of monosyllabic monomorphemic words. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 290-313. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.03.008
2. Bertram, R., Baayen, R. H., & Schreuder, R. (2000). Effects of family size for complex words. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 390-405. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2681
3. Bertram, R., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2000). The balance of storage and computation in morphological processing: The role of word formation type, affixal homonymy, and productivity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 26, 489-511. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.26.2.489
4. Buttherworth, B. (1983). Lexical representation. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production (pp. 257-294). London, England: Academic Press.
5. Caramazza, A., Laudanna, A., & Romani, C. (1988). Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition, 28, 297-332. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(88)90017-0
6. Carlisle, J., & Katz, C. (2006). Effects of word and morpheme familiarity on reading a derived word. Reading and Writing, 19, 669-693. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-5766-2
7. De Jong, N., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. (2000). The morphological family size effect and morphology. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 329-365. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01690960050119625
8. Duñabeitia, J. A., Laka, I., Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2008). Is Milkman a superhero like Batman? Constituent morphological priming in compound words. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21, 615-640.
9. Faitelson, S. (1993) Sufijación y derivación sufijal: Sentido y forma. [Suffixation and derivation: Form and meaning] In S. Varela. (Ed.), La formación de palabras [Word formation] (pp. 131-144). Madrid, Spain: Taurus universitaria.
10. Ford, M. A., Davis, M. H., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2010). Derivational morphology and base morpheme frequency. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 117-130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2009.01.003
11. Gold, B., & Rastle, K. (2007). Neural correlates of morphological decomposition during visual words recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1983-1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2007.19.12.1983
12. Lavric, A., Clapp, A., & Rastle, K. (2007). ERP evidence of morphological analysis from orthography: A masked priming study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 866-877. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2007.19.5.866
13. Leinonen, A., Brattico, P., Järvenpää, M., & Krause, C. (2008). Event-related potential (ERP) responses to violations of inflectional and derivational rules of Finnish. Brain Research, 1218, 181-193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2008.04.049
14. Marslen-Wilson, W., Bozic, M., & Randall, B. (2008). Early decomposition in visual word recognition: Dissociating morphology, form and meaning. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 394-421. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01690960701588004
15. Marslen-wilson, W., Komisarjevsky, L., Waksler, R., & Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101, 3-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.101.1.3
16. Meunier, F., & Longtin, C-M. (2007). Morphological decomposition and semantic integration in word processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 457-471. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.11.005
17. Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (1997). How complex words can be. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 118-139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1997.2510
18. Pylkkänen, L., Feintuch, S., Hopkins, E., & Marantz, A. (2004). Neural correlates of the effects on morphological family frequency and family size: An MEG study. Cognition, 91, 35-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2003.09.008
19. Schreuder, R., Burani, C., & Baayen, R. H. (2003). Parsing and semantic opacity. In E. Assink & D. Sandra (Eds.), Morphology and the mental lexicon. (pp. 14-49). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
20. Sebastián, N., Cuetos, F., Martí, M. A., & Carreiras, M. (2000). LEXESP. Léxico informatizado del español [Lexesp: A Spanish computerized lexical database] Barcelona, Spain: UB.
21. Taft, M., & Forster, K. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 638-647. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(75)80051-X
22. Taft, M. (2003). Morphological representation as a correlation between form and meaning. In E. Assink & D. Sandra (Eds.), Reading complex words. (pp 113-137). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Kluiber.
23. Taft, M. (2004). Morphological decomposition and the reverse base frequency effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 745-765. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02724980343000477
24. Taft, M., & Nguyen-Hoan, M. (2010). A sticky stick? The locus of morphological representation in the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25, 277-296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01690960903043261