Derivational morphology and base morpheme frequency

Journal of Memory and Language

Volumn 63, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 117-130

  Ford, M A ^a   Davis, M H ^b   Marslen Wilson, W D ^b  

^a UK   (United Kingdom)

^b MRC COGNITION AND BRAIN SCIENCES UNIT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Frequency effects; Lexical decision; Lexical representation; Morphology

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951652908     PISSN: 0749596X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2009.01.003     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Alegre M., Gordon P. Frequency effects and the representational status of regular inflections. Journal of Memory and Language 1999, 40:41-61.
2. Baayen H., Dijkstra T., Schreuder R. Singulars and plurals Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual-route model. Journal of Memory and Language 1997, 37:94-117.
3. Baayen R.H., Feldman L.B., Schreuder R. Morphological influences on the recognition of monosyllabic monomorphemic words. Journal of Memory and Language 2006, 55:293-313.
4. Baayen R.H., Lieber R. Productivity and English derivation: A corpus-based study. Linguistics 1991, 29(4):801-844.
5. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database (CDROM). Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
6. Bauer L. English word formation 1983, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
7. Bertram R., Baayen R.H., Schreuder R. Effects of family size for complex words. Journal of Memory and Language 2000, 42:390-405.
8. Bertram R., Schreuder R., Baayen R.H. The balance of storage and computation in morphological processing: The role of word formation type, affixal homonymy, and productivity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 2000, 26:489-511.
9. Bradley D. Lexical representation of derivational relation. Juncture 1979, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. M.L. Kean (Ed.).
10. Broadbent D.E. Word frequency effect and response bias. Psychological Review 1967, 74:1-15.
11. Burani C., Caramazza A. Representation and processing of derived words. Language and Cognitive Processes 1987, 2:217-227.
12. Burani C., Salmaso D., Caramazza A. Morphological structure and lexical access. Visible Language 1984, 18(4):342-352.
13. Clahsen H., Eisenbeiss S., Sonnenstuhl-Henning I. Morphological structure and the processing of inflected words. Theoretical Linguistics 1997, 23(3):201-250.
14. Colé P., Beauvillain C., Segui J. On the representation and processing of prefixed and suffixed derived words: A differential frequency effect. Journal of Memory and Language 1989, 28:1-13.
15. Colombo L., Burani C. The influence of age of acquisition, root frequency, and context availability in processing nouns and verbs. Brain and Language 2002, 81:398-411.
16. Coltheart M., Davelaar E., Jonasson J.T., Besner D. Access to the internal lexicon. Attention and performance VI 1977, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. S. Dornic (Ed.).
17. De Jong N.H., Schreuder R., Baayen R.H. The morphological family size effect and morphology. Language and Cognitive Processes 2000, 15:329-365.
18. Forster K.I. Accessing the mental lexicon. New approaches to language mechanisms 1976, 257-287. North-Holland, Amsterdam. R.J. Wales, E. Walker (Eds.).
19. Forster K.I., Forster J.C. A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods Instruments and Computers 2003, 35:116-124.
20. Giraudo H., Grainger J. Effects of prime word frequency and cumulative root frequency in masked morphological priming. Language and Cognitive Processes 2000, 15:421-444.
21. Hauk O., Davis M.H., Ford M., Pulvermüller F., Marslen-Wilson W.D. The time course of visual word recognition as revealed by linear regression analysis of ERP data. Neuroimage 2006, 30(4):1383-1400.
22. Howes D.H., Solomon R.L. Visual duration threshold as a function of word-probability. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1951, 41:401-410.
23. Kempley S., Morton J. The effects of priming with regularly and irregularly related words in auditory word recognition. British Journal of Psychology 1982, 73:441-454.
24. Laudanna A., Burani C., Cermele A. Prefixes as processing units. Language and Cognitive Processes 1994, 9:295-316.
25. Lorch R.F., Myers J.L. Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 1990, 16:149-157.
26. Marchand H. The categories and types of present-day English word-formation 1969, C.H. Beck, Munich. 2nd ed.
27. Marslen-Wilson W.D., Tyler L.K., Waksler R., Older L. Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review 1994, 101:3-33.
28. Matthews J.N.S., Altman D.G., Campbell M.J., Royston P. Analysis of serial measurements in medical research. British Medical Journal 1990, 300:230-235.
29. McCormick, S. F., Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2007). Is there a fete in fetish? Effects of orthographic opacity on morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language. doi:10.1016/j.jml.20.
30. Meunier F., Segui J. Frequency effects in auditory word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language 1999, 41:327-344.
31. Morton J. Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review 1969, 76:165-178.
32. Niswander E., Pollatsek A., Rayner K. The processing of derived and inflected suffixed words during reading. Language and Cognitive Processes 2000, 15:389-420.
33. Oxford English Dictionary on CD-ROM (1992). Oxford University Press, Oxford.
34. Plag I. Productivity. Handbook of English linguistics 2004, 537-576. Blackwell, Oxford. B. Aarts, A. McMahon (Eds.).
35. Schreuder R., Baayen R.H. Modeling morphological processing. Language comprehension: A biological perspective 1995, 101-132. Springer, Berlin. 2nd ed. A. Friederici (Ed.).
36. Schreuder R., Baayen R.H. How complex simplex words can be. Journal of Memory and Language 1997, 41:327-344.
37. Sereno J.A., Jongman A. Processing of English inflectional morphology. Memory & Cognition 1997, 25:425-437.
38. Stevens J.P. Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences 1999, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. 3rd ed.
39. Taft M. Recognition of affixed words and the word-frequency effect. Memory & Cognition 1979, 7:263-272.
40. Taft M. Interactive-activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing. Language and Cognitive Processes 1994, 9:271-294.
41. Taft M. Morphological decomposition and the reverse base frequency effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A - Human Experimental Psychology 2004, 57:745-765.