Beyond Epistemological Deficits: Dynamic explanations of engineering students' difficulties with mathematical sense-making

International Journal of Science Education

Volumn 33, Issue 18, 2011, Pages 2463-2488

  Gupta, Ayush ^a   Elby, Andrew ^a  

^a University of Maryland   (United States)

Author keywords

Mathematical sense making; Physics education; Qualitative research; Science education

Indexed keywords

EID: 84863400450     PISSN: 09500693     EISSN: 14645289     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2010.551551     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Arcavi, A. 1994. Symbol sense: Informal sense-making in formal mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14: 3
2. Bing, T. J. and Redish, E. F. 2009. Analyzing problem solving using math in physics: Epistemological framing via warrants. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 5(2): 020108
3. Burkhardt, H. and Schoenfeld, A. H. 2003. Improving educational research: Toward a more useful, more influential, and better-funded enterprise. Educational Researcher, 32(9): 3-14.
4. Carey, S. 1986. Cognitive science and science education. American Psychologist, 41(10): 1123-1130.
5. Chi, M. T. 2005. Commonsense conceptions of emergent processes: Why some misconceptions are robust. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2): 161-199.
6. Chi, M. T., Glaser, R. and Rees, E. 1981. "Expertise in problem solving". In Advances in the psychology of human intelligence, Edited by: Sternberg, R. J. vol. 1, 1-75. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. Clement, J. 1982. Students' preconceptions in introductory mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 50(1): 66-71.
8. Conlin, L. D., Gupta, A., Scherr, R. E. and Hammer, D. The dynamics of students' behaviors and reasoning during collaborative physics tutorial sessions. AIP Conference Proceedings. Edited by: Hsu, L., Henderson, C. and McCullough, L. Vol. 951(1), pp.69-72. Melville, NY: American Institute of Physics.
9. Elby, A. 1999. Another reason that physics students learn by rote. American Journal of Physics, 67(S1): S52-S57.
10. Frank, B. 2009. "The dynamics of variability in introductory physics students' thinking: Examples from kinematics. Doctoral dissertation". University of Maryland. Retrieved fromhttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/9820
11. Gainsburg, J. 2006. The mathematical modeling of structural engineers. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 8(1): 3
12. Gee, J. P., Staff, G. J. and Paul, J. 1999. An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method, London: Routledge.
13. Gupta, A., Danielak, B. A. and Elby, A. Understanding students' difficulties in terms of coupled epistemological and affective dynamics. ASEE/IEEE 2010 Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings. Los Alamitos, CA. IEEE. Retrieved fromhttp://arxiv.org/abs/1003.4238
14. Hall, R. P. and Stevens, R. 1995. "Making space: A comparison of mathematical work in school and professional design practices". In The cultures of computing, Edited by: Star, S. L. 118-145. Oxford: Blackwell.
15. Hammer, D. 1989. Two approaches to learning physics. The Physics Teacher, 27(9): 664-670.
16. Hammer, D. 1994. Epistemological beliefs in introductory physics. Cognition and Instruction, 12(2): 151-183.
17. Hammer, D. and Elby, A. 2002. "On the form of a personal epistemology". In Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing, Edited by: Hofer, B. K. and Pintrich, P. R. 169-190. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18. Hammer, D. and Elby, A. 2003. Tapping epistemological resources for learning physics. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(1): 53-90.
19. Hammer, D., Elby, A., Scherr, R.E. and Redish, E.F. 2005. "Resources, framing, and transfer". In Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective, Edited by: Mestre, J. P. 89-120. Greenwich, CT: IAP.
20. Hofer, B. K. and Pintrich, P. R. 1997. The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1): 88-140.
21. Hofer, B. K. and Pintrich, P. R., eds. 2002. Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22. Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., Rodriguez, A. B. and Duschl, R. 2000. 'Doing the lesson' or 'doing science': Argument in high school genetics. Science Education, 84: 757-792.
23. King, P. M. and Kitchener, K. S. 2002. "The reflective judgment model: Twenty years of research on epistemic cognition". In Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing, Edited by: Hofer, B. K. and Pintrich, P. R. 37-61. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24. Kuhn, D. 1989. Children and adults as intuitive scientists. Psychological Review, 96(4): 674-689.
25. Ladson-Billings, G. 1997. It doesn't add up: African American students' mathematics achievement. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(6): 697-708.
26. Lising, L. and Elby, A. 2005. The impact of epistemology on learning: A case study from introductory physics. American Journal of Physics, 73(4): 372-382.
27. Louca, L., Elby, A., Hammer, D. and Kagey, T. 2004. Epistemological resources: Applying a new epistemological framework to science instruction. Educational Psychologist, 39(1): 57
28. McCloskey, M. 1983. "Naive theories of motion". In Mental models, Edited by: Gentner, D. and Stevens, A. L. 299-324. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29. Mestre, J. P. 2002. Probing adults' conceptual understanding and transfer of learning via problem posing. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 23(1): 9-50.
30. Miles, M. B. and Huberman, A. M. 1984. Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
31. Muis, K. R. 2004. Personal epistemology and mathematics: A critical review and synthesis of research. Review of Educational Research, 74(3): 317-377.
32. Perry, W. G. 1970. Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
33. Redish, E. F. 2004. "A theoretical framework for physics education research: Modeling student thinking". Retrieved fromhttp://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED493138
34. Redish, E. F. and Gupta, A. Making meaning with math in physics: A semantic analysis. Selected contributions from the GIREP-EPEC & PHEC 2009 International Conference. Edited by: Raine, D., Hurkett, C. and Rogers, L. pp.244-260. Leicester: Lulu/The Center for Interdisciplinary Science, University of Leichester. Retrieved fromhttp://arxiv.org/abs/1002.0472
35. Redish, E. F. and Hammer, D. 2009. Reinventing college physics for biologists: Explicating an epistemological curriculum. American Journal of Physics, 77: 629-642.
36. Redish, E. F., Saul, J. M. and Steinberg, R. N. 1998. Student expectations in introductory physics. American Journal of Physics, 66: 212-224.
37. Redish, E. F. and Smith, K. A. 2008. Looking beyond content: Skill development for engineers. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3): 295-307.
38. Rosenberg, S., Hammer, D. and Phelan, J. 2006. Multiple epistemological coherences in an eighth-grade discussion of the rock cycle. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2): 261
39. Scherr, R. E. and Hammer, D. 2009. Student behavior and epistemological framing: Examples from collaborative active-learning activities in physics. Cognition and Instruction, 27(2): 147
40. Schoenfeld, A. H. 1982. Measures of problem-solving performance and of problem-solving instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 13(1): 31-49.
41. Schoenfeld, A. H. 1985. Mathematical problem solving, New York: Academic Press.
42. Schoenfeld, A. H. 1987. "What's all the fuss about metacognition". In Cognitive science and mathematics education, Edited by: Schoenfeld, A. H. 189-215. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
43. Schoenfeld, A. H. 1988. When good teaching leads to bad results: The disasters of 'well-taught' mathematics courses. Educational Psychologist, 23(2): 145-166.
44. Schoenfeld, A. H. 1989. Explorations of students' mathematical beliefs and behavior. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20: 338-355.
45. Schoenfeld, A. H. 1992a. "Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics". In Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, Edited by: Grouws, D. 334-370. New York: Macmillan.
46. Schoenfeld, A. H. 1992b. On paradigms and methods: What do you do when the ones you know don't do what you want them to? Issues in the analysis of data in the form of videotapes. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2): 179-214.
47. Schoenfeld, A. H. 1999. Looking toward the 21st century: Challenges of educational theory and practice. Educational Researcher, 28(7): 4-14.
48. Schommer, M., Crouse, A. and Rhodes, N. 1992. Epistemological beliefs and mathematical text comprehension: Believing it is simple does not make it so. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4): 435-443.
49. Tannen, D. 1993. Framing in discourse, New York: Oxford University Press.
50. Tuminaro, J. and Redish, E. F. 2007. Elements of a cognitive model of physics problem solving: Epistemic games. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 3(2): 020101