Exploring user satisfaction in a tutorial dialogue system

Proceedings of the SIGDIAL 2011 Conference: 12th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 162-172

  Dzikovska, Myroslava O ^a   Moore, Johanna D ^a   Steinhauser, Natalie ^b   Campbell, Gwendolyn ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIALOGUE SYSTEMS; EVALUATION METRICS; FACTOR ANALYSIS; STUDENT LEARNING; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE; UNDERLYING COMPONENTS; USER SATISFACTION;

SPEECH PROCESSING;

QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 84863398792     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Dennis A. Adams, R. Ryan Nelson, and Peter A. Todd. 1989. Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology. MIS Quarterly., 13:319-339.
2. Myroslava Dzikovska, Natalie B. Steinhauser, Johanna D. Moore, Gwendolyn E. Campbell, Katherine M. Harrison, and Leanne S. Taylor. 2010a. Content, social, and metacognitive statements: An empirical study comparing human-human and humancomputer tutorial dialogue. In Sustaining TEL: From Innovation to Learning and Practice - 5th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (EC-TEL 2010), pages 93-108, Barcelona, Spain, October.
3. Myroslava O. Dzikovska, Johanna D. Moore, Natalie Steinhauser, and Gwendolyn Campbell. 2010b. The impact of interpretation problems on tutorial dialogue. In Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics(ACL-2010), Uppsala, Sweden, July.
4. Myroslava O. Dzikovska, Johanna D. Moore, Natalie Steinhauser, Gwendolyn Campbell, Elaine Farrow, and Charles B. Callaway. 2010c. Beetle II: a system for tutoring and computational linguistics experimentation. In Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL-2010) demo session, Uppsala, Sweden, July.
5. Katherine Forbes-Riley and Diane J. Litman. 2009. Adapting to student uncertainty improves tutoring dialogues. In Artificial Intelligence in Education: Building Learning Systems that Care: From Knowledge Representation to Affective Modelling, Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2009), pages 33-40, Brighton, UK, July.
6. Katherine Forbes-Riley and Diane J. Litman. 2011. Designing and evaluating a wizarded uncertainty-adaptive spoken dialogue tutoring system. Computer Speech & Language, 25(1):105-126.
7. Katherine Forbes-Riley, Diane J. Litman, Scott Silliman, and Joel R. Tetreault. 2006. Comparing synthesized versus pre-recorded tutor speech in an intelligent tutoring spoken dialogue system. In Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, pages 509-514, Melbourne Beach, Florida, USA, May. (Pubitemid 44074114)
8. Kate S. Hone and Robert Graham. 2000. Towards a tool for the subjective assessment of speech system interfaces (SASSI). Natural Language Engineering, 6(3&4):287-303.
9. G. Tanner Jackson, Arthur C. Graesser, and Danielle S. McNamara. 2009. What students expect may have more impact than what they know or feel. In Proceedings 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED), Brighton, UK.
10. Lars Bo Larsen. 2003. Issues in the evaluation of spoken dialogue systems using objective and subjective measures. In Proceedings of 2003 IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding (ASRU'03), pages 209 - 214, December.
11. Diane Litman, Johanna Moore, Myroslava Dzikovska, and Elaine Farrow. 2009. Using natural language processing to analyze tutorial dialogue corpora across domains and modalities. In Proceedings of 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED), Brighton, UK, July.
12. Joel Michael, Allen Rovick, Michael Glass, Yujian Zhou, and Martha Evens. 2003. Learning from a computer tutor with natural language capabilities. Interactive Learning Environments, 11:233-262(30).
13. Sebastian Möller, Paula Smeele, Heleen Boland, and Jan Krebber. 2007. Evaluating spoken dialogue systems according to de-facto standards: A case study. Computer Speech & Language, 21(1):26 - 53. (Pubitemid 44537644)
14. Amruta Purandare and Diane Litman. 2008. Content-learning correlations in spoken tutoring dialogs at word, turn and discourse levels. In Proceedings of the 21st International FLAIRS Conference, Coconut Grove, Florida, May.
15. Marilyn A. Walker, Candace A. Kamm, and Diane J. Litman. 2000. Towards Developing General Models of Usability with PARADISE. Natural Language Engineering, 6(3).
16. Maria Wolters, Kallirroi Georgila, Robert Logie, Sarah MacPherson, Johanna Moore, and Matt Watson. 2009. Reducing working memory load in spoken dialogue systems. Interacting with Computers, 21(4):276-287.