Object recognition in 3D point clouds using web data and domain adaptation

International Journal of Robotics Research

Volumn 29, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 1019-1037

  Lai, Kevin ^a   Fox, Dieter ^a,b  

^a University of Washington   (United States)

^b INTEL CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

3D POINT CLOUD; ACTIVE FIELD; CLASSIFICATION ACCURACY; DATA SETS; DOMAIN ADAPTATION; INDOOR ENVIRONMENT; LABELED TRAINING DATA; OBJECT DETECTION; OBJECT DETECTION SYSTEMS; POINT CLOUD; REAL ROBOT; REAL WORLD ENVIRONMENTS; WEB DATA;

CLOUDS; ROBOTS; THREE DIMENSIONAL; WAREHOUSES; WORLD WIDE WEB;

OBJECT RECOGNITION;

EID: 77954064287     PISSN: 02783649     EISSN: 17413176     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0278364910369190     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (40)

1. Anguelov, D., Taskar, B., Chatalbashev, V., Koller, D., Gupta, D., Heitz, G. and Ng, A. (2005). Discriminative learning of Markov random fields for segmentation of 3D scan data. Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 169- 176.
2. Assfalg, J., Bertini, M., Del Bimbo, A. and Pala, P. (2007). Content-based retrieval of 3-D objects using spin image signatures. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 9 (3). 589-599.
3. Bacchiani, M. and Roark, B. (2003). Unsupervised language model adaptation. Proceedings of the International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, pp. 224- 227.
4. Boser, B.E., Guyon, I.M. and Vapnik, V.N. (1992). A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers. COLT 92: Proceedings of the 5th Annual Workshop on Computational Learning Theory. New York, ACM Press, pp. 144-152.
5. Caruana, R. (1997). Multitask learning: A knowledge-based source of inductive bias. Machine Learning, 28: 41-48.
6. Chang, C.-C. and Lin, C.-J. (2001). LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines. http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/goo1/4cjlin/libsvm.
7. Chelba, C. and Acero, A. (2004). Adaptation of maximum entropy capitalizer: little data can help a lot. Proceedings of EMNLP 2004, Lin, D. and Wu, D. (eds). Barcelona, Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 285-292.
8. Comaniciu, D. and Meer, P. (2002). Mean shift: A robust approach toward feature space analysis. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (PAMI), 24 (5). 603-619.
9. Dai, W., Yang, Q., Xue, G. and Yu, Y. (2007). Boosting for transfer learning. Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), pp. 193-200.
10. Daum III, H. (2007). Frustratingly easy domain adaptation. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), pp. 256-263.
11. Daum© III, H. and Marcu, D. (2006). Domain adaptation for statistical classifiers. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (JAIR), 26: 101-126.
12. Douillard, B., Fox, D. and Ramos, F. (2008). Laser and vision based outdoor object mapping. Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems (RSS), pp. 9-16.
13. Fischler, M.A. and Bolles, R.C. (1981). Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. Communications of the ACM, 24 (6). 381-395.
14. Friedman, J., Hastie, T. and Tibshirani, R. (2000). Additive logistic regression: a statistical view of boosting. The Annals of Statistics, 28 (2). 337-407.
15. Gildea, D. (2001). Corpus variation and parser performance. Proceedings of the 2001 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Lee, L. and Harman, D. (eds), pp. 167-202.
16. Google (2008). 3D Warehouse. http://sketchup.google.com/3dwarehouse/.
17. Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P. and Witten, I.H. (2009). The Weka data mining software: an update. SIGKDD Exploration Newsletter, 11 (1). 10-18.
18. Hays, J. and Efros, A. (2007). Scene completion using millions of photographs. ACM Transactions on Graphics (Proceedings of SIGGRAPH), 26 (3). 4.
19. Hwa, R. (1999). Supervised grammar induction using training data with limited constituent information. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the ACL, pp. 73-79.
20. Jiang, J. and Zhai, C. (2007). Instance weighting for domain adaptation in NLP. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), pp. 264-271.
21. Johnson, A. and Hebert, M. (1999). Using spin images for efficient object recognition in cluttered 3D scenes. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (PAMI), 21 (5). 433-449.
22. Keerthi, S.S., Chapelle, O. and DeCoste, D. (2006). Building support vector machines with reduced classifier complexity. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 7: 1493-1515.
23. Konolige, K. (2010). Projected texture stereo. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation (ICRA), (in press).
24. Körtgen, M., Park, G.J., Novotni, M. and Klein, R. (2003). 3D shape matching with 3D shape contexts. The 7th Central European Seminar on Computer Graphics, pp. 1-12.
25. Li, L.-J., Wang, G. and Fei-Fei., L. (2007). Optimol: automatic object picture collection via incremental model learning. IEEE Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 1-8.
26. Malisiewicz, T. and Efros, A. (2007). Improving spatial support for objects via multiple segmentations. Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference, pp. 1-10.
27. Malisiewicz, T. and Efros, A. (2008). Recognition by association via learning per-examplar distances. Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 1-8.
28. Novotni, M. and Klein, R. (2003). 3D zernike descriptors for content based shape retrieval. SM 03: Proceedings of the 8th ACM Symposium on Solid Modeling and Applications. New York, ACM, pp. 216-225.
29. Nachter, A., Surmann, H. and Hertzberg, J. (2004). Automatic classification of objects in 3D laser range scans. Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Intelligent Autonomous Systems. IOS Press, pp. 963-970.
30. Posner, I., Cummins, M. and Newman, P. (2008). Fast probabilistic labeling of city maps. Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems (RSS), pp. 17-24.
31. Roark, B. and Bacchiani, M. (2003). Supervised and unsupervised PCFG adaptation to novel domains. NAACL 03: Proceedings of the 2003 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Human Language Technology. Morristown, NJ, Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 126-133.
32. Russell, B., Torralba, K., Murphy, A. and Freeman, W. (2008). LabelMe: a database and web-based tool for image annotation. International Journal of Computer Vision, 77 ( 1-3 ).
33. Sapp, B., Saxena, A. and Ng, A. (2008). A fast data collection and augmentation procedure for object recognition. Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), pp. 1402-1408.
34. Saxena, A., Driemeyer, J. and Ng, A. (2008). Robotic grasping of novel objects using vision. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 27 (2). 157-173. (Pubitemid 351169712)
35. Shi, J. and Malik, J. (2000). Normalized cuts and image segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (PAMI), 22 (8). 731-737.
36. Shilane, P., Min, P., Kazhdan, M. and Funkhouser, T. (2004). The Princeton shape benchmark. Shape Modeling International, pp. 167-178.
37. Torralba, A., Fergus, R. and Freeman, W. (2008). 80 million tiny images: a large dataset for non-parametric object and scene recognition. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (PAMI), 30 (11). 1958-1970.
38. Triebel, R., Schmidt, R., Martinez Mozos, O. and Burgard, W. (2007). Instance-based AMN classification for improved object recognition in 2D and 3D laser range data. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pp. 2225-2230.
39. van Rijsbergen, C. (1979). Information Retrieval, 2 nd edition. London, Butterworths.
40. Wellington, C., Courville, A. and Stentz, T. (2005). Interacting Markov random fields for simultaneous terrain modeling and obstacle detection. Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems (RSS), pp. 1-8.