Semantic picture-word interference is a postperceptual effect

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 301-308

  Schnur, Tatiana T ^a   Martin, Randi ^a  

^a RICE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Picture word interference paradigm; Psychological refractory period; Speech production

Indexed keywords

EID: 84863393345     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-011-0190-x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Ayora, P., Peressotti, F., Alario, F.-X., Mulatti, C., Pluchino, P., Job, R., & Dell'Acqua, R. (2011). What phonological facilitation tells about semantic interference: A dual-task study. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 57: 1-10. doi: 10. 3389/fpsyg. 2011. 00057.
2. Bloem, I., van den Boogaard, S., & La Heij, W. (2004). Semantic facilitation and semantic interference in language production: Further evidence for the conceptual selection model of lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 307-323.
3. Byrne, M. D., & Anderson, J. R. (2001). Serial modules in parallel: The psychological refractory period and perfect time-sharing. Psychological Review, 108, 847-869.
4. Cohen, J. D., Dunbar, K., & McClelland, J. L. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review, 97, 332-361. doi: 10. 1037/0033-295X. 97. 3. 332.
5. de Jong, R. (1993). Multiple bottlenecks in overlapping task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 965-980. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 19. 5. 965.
6. Dell'Acqua, R., Job, R., Peressotti, F., & Pascali, A. (2007). The picture-word interference effect is not a Stroop effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 717-722.
7. Dell'Acqua, R., Lotto, L., & Job, R. (2000). Naming times and standardized norms for the Italian PD/DPSS set of 266 pictures: Direct comparisons with American, English, French, and Spanish published databases. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 32, 588-615. doi: 10. 3758/BF03200832.
8. Fagot, C., & Pashler, H. (1992). Making two responses to a single object: Implications for the central attentional bottleneck. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1058-1079. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 18. 4. 1058.
9. Huestegge, L., & Koch, I. (2009). Dual-task crosstalk between saccades and manual responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 352-362.
10. Janssen, N., Schirm, W., Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2008). Semantic interference in a delayed naming task: Evidence for the response exclusion hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 249-256.
11. Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1-75.
12. Lien, M. C., Ruthruff, E., Cornett, L., Goodin, Z., & Allen, P. A. (2008). On the nonautomaticity of visual word processing: Electrophysiological evidence that word processing requires central attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 751-773.
13. Luce, R. D. (1986). Response times: Their role in inferring mental organization. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.
14. Lupker, S. J. (1979). The semantic nature of response competition in the picture-word interference task. Memory & Cognition, 7, 485-495. doi: 10. 3758/BF03198265.
15. MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163-203. doi: 10. 1037/0033-2909. 109. 2. 163.
16. Mädebach, A., Oppermann, F., Hantsch, A., Curda, C., & Jescheniak, J. D. (2011). Is there semantic interference in delayed naming? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 522-538.
17. Mahon, B. Z., Costa, A., Peterson, R., Vargas, K. A., & Caramazza, A. (2007). Lexical selection is not by competition: A reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 503-535. doi: 10. 1037/0278-7393. 33. 3. 503.
18. McCann, R. S., Remington, R. W., & van Selst, M. (2000). A dual-task investigation of automaticity in visual word processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1352-1370. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 26. 4. 1352.
19. Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance 2: Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. Psychological Review, 104, 749-791.
20. Pashler, H. (1989). Dissociations and dependencies between speed and accuracy: Evidence for a two-component theory of divided attention in simple tasks. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 469-514. doi: 10. 1016/0010-0285(89)90016-9.
21. Piai, V., Roelofs, A., & Schriefers, H. (2011). Semantic interference in immediate and delayed naming and reading: Attention and task decisions. Journal of Memory and Language, 64, 404-423.
22. Roelofs, A. (1992). A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking. Cognition, 42, 107-142. doi: 10. 1016/0010-0277(92)90041-F.
23. Roelofs, A. (2003). Goal-referenced selection of verbal action: Modeling attentional control in the Stroop task. Psychological Review, 110, 88-125.
24. Schumacher, E. H., Lauber, E. J., Glass, J. M., Zurbriggen, E. L., Gmeindl, L., Kieras, D. E., & Meyer, D. E. (1999). Concurrent response-selection processes in dual-task performance: Evidence for adaptive executive control of task scheduling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 791-814.
25. Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). Standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174-215. doi: 10. 1037/0278-7393. 6. 2. 174.
26. Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extension of Donders' method. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276-315. doi: 10. 1016/0001-6918(69)90055-9.
27. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662. doi: 10. 1037/0096-3445. 121. 1. 15.
28. van Maanen, L., & van Rijn, H. (2007). An accumulator model of semantic interference. Cognitive Systems Research, 8, 174-181. doi: 10. 1016/j. cogsys. 2007. 05. 002.
29. van Maanen, L., & van Rijn, H. (2010). The locus of the Gratton effect in picture-word interference. Topics in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 168-180.
30. van Maanen, L., van Rijn, H., & Borst, J. P. (2009). Stroop and picture-word interference are two sides of the same coin. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 987-999. doi: 10. 3758/PBR. 16. 6. 987.
31. van Maanen, L., van Rijn, H., & Taatgen, N. A. (2011). RACE/A: An architectural account of the interactions between learning, task control, and retrieval dynamics. Cognitive Science. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1551-6709. 2011. 01213. x.