Evaluation of stroke volume variation obtained by the flotrac™/Vigileo™ system to guide preoperative fluid therapy in patients undergoing brain surgery

Journal of International Medical Research

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 1175-1181

  Li, J ^a   Ji, Fuhai ^a   Yang, J P ^a  

^a THE FIRST AFFILIATED HOSPITAL OF SOOCHOW UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Brain surgery; Flotrac vigileo system; Fluid therapy; Haemodynamic Stability; Stroke volume variation

Indexed keywords

FENTANYL; MIDAZOLAM; PROPOFOL; RINGER LACTATE SOLUTION; SEVOFLURANE; VECURONIUM;

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; BLOOD PRESSURE VARIABILITY; BRAIN SURGERY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTINUOUS INFUSION; FEMALE; FLUID THERAPY; HEART RATE VARIABILITY; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HEMODYNAMIC MONITORING; HUMAN; MALE; MONITOR; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; PROGNOSIS; REPEATED DRUG DOSE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STROKE VOLUME VARIATION; SURGICAL PATIENT; TREATMENT RESPONSE;

EID: 84863102776     PISSN: 03000605     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/147323001204000338     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Guidelines for cerebral perfusion pressure. Brain Trauma Foundation. J Neurotrauma 1996; 13: 693-697.
2. Brandstrup B, Tønnesen H, Beier-Holgersen R, et al: Effects of intravenous fluid restriction on postoperative complications: comparison of two perioperative fluid regimens: a randomized assessor-blinded multicenter trial. Ann Surg 2003; 238: 641-648.
3. Feissel M, Michard F, Mangin I, et al: Respiratory changes in aortic blood velocity as an indicator of fluid responsiveness in ventilated patients with septic shock. Chest 2001; 119: 867-873.
4. Tavernier B, Makhotine O, Lebuffe G, et al: Systolic pressure variation as a guide to fluid therapy in patients with sepsis-induced hypotension. Anesthesiology 1998; 89: 1313-1321.
5. Rex S, Brose S, Metzelder S, et al: Prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients during cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 2004; 93: 782-788.
6. Wiesenack C, Fiegl C, Keyser A, et al: Assessment of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated cardiac surgical patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2005; 22: 658-665.
7. Michard F: Changes in arterial pressure during mechanical ventilation. Anesthesiology 2005; 103: 419-428.
8. Bendjelid K, Romand JA: Fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a review of indices used in intensive care. Intensive Care Med 2003; 29: 352-360.
9. Pinsky MR, Teboul JL: Assessment of indices of preload and volume responsiveness. Curr Opin Crit Care 2005; 11: 235-239.
10. Berkenstadt H, Margalit N, Hadani M, et al: Stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing brain surgery. Anesth Analg 2001; 92: 984-989.
11. Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D, et al: Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 162: 134-138.
12. Vallée F, Fourcade O, De Soyres O, et al: Stroke output variations calculated by esophageal Doppler is a reliable predictor of fluid response. Intensive Care Med 2005; 31: 1388-1393.
13. Lee JH, Kim JT, Yoon SZ, et al: Evaluation of corrected flow time in oesophageal Doppler as a predictor of fluid responsiveness. Br J Anaesth 2007; 99: 343-348.
14. Cannesson M, Attof Y, Rosamel P, et al: Comparison of FloTrac cardiac output monitoring system in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with pulmonary artery cardiac output measurements. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2007; 24: 832-839.
15. Biais M, Nouette-Gaulain K, Cottenceau V, et al: Cardiac output measurement in patients undergoing liver transplantation: pulmonary artery catheter versus uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis. Anesth Analg 2008; 106: 1480-1486.
16. Hashim B, Lerner AB: The FloTrac™ system-measurement of stroke volume and the assessment of dynamic fluid loading. Int Anesthesiol Clin 2010; 48: 45-56.
17. Manecke GR Jr: Pro: the FloTrac device should be used to follow cardiac output in cardiac surgical patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2010; 24: 706-708.
18. Singh S, Taylor MA: Con: the FloTrac device should not be used to follow cardiac output in cardiac surgical patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2010; 24: 709-711.
19. de Waal EE, Rex S, Kruitwagen CL, et al: Stroke volume variation obtained with FloTrac/Vigileo fails to predict fluid responsiveness in coronary artery bypass graft patients. Br J Anaesth 2008; 100: 725-726.
20. Lahner D, Kabon B, Marschalek C: Evaluation of stroke volume variation obtained by arterial pulse contour analysis to predict fluid responsiveness intraoperatively. Br J Anaesth 2009; 103: 346-351.
21. Cannesson M, Musard H, Desebbe O, et al: The ability of stroke volume variations obtained with Vigileo/FloTrac system to monitor fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. Anesth Analg 2009; 108: 513-517.
22. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA): ASA Physical Status Classification System. Park Ridge: ASA (available at http://www.asahq.org/ Home/For-Members/Clinical-Information/ASAPhysical-Status-Classification-System).
23. Hofer CK, Senn A, Weibel L, et al: Assessment of stroke volume variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness using the modified FloTrac™ and PiCCOplus™ system. Crit Care 2008; 12: R82.
24. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ: A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 1983; 148: 839-843.
25. Hofer CK, Müller SM, Furrer L, et al: Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Chest 2005; 128: 848-854.
26. Marx G, Cope T, McCrossan L, et al: Assessing fluid responsiveness by stroke volume variation in mechanically ventilated patients with severe sepsis. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2004; 21: 132-138.
27. Reuter DA, Kirchner A, Felbinger TW, et al: Usefulness of left ventricular stroke volume variation to assess fluid responsiveness in patients with reduced cardiac function. Crit Care Med 2003; 31: 1399-1404.
28. Peyton PJ, Chong SW: Minimally invasive measurement of cardiac output during surgery and critical care: a meta-analysis of accuracy and precision. Anesthesiology 2010; 113: 1220-