Anticipation of land use change through use of geographically weighted regression models for discrete response

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 2245, 2011, Pages 111-123

  Wang, Yiyi ^a   Kockelman, Kara M ^a   Wang, Xiaokun ^b  

^a The University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

^b RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HOUSING; POPULATION STATISTICS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL TESTS;

COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT; DATA SET; EXPLICIT TREATMENTS; GEOGRAPHICALLY WEIGHTED REGRESSION; GEOGRAPHICALLY WEIGHTED REGRESSION MODELLING; LANDUSE CHANGE; LOCAL POPULATIONS; REGRESSION TECHNIQUES; RESPONSE DATA; SPATIAL EFFECT;

LAND USE;

EID: 84863016971     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2245-14     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Manson, S. M. Agent-Based Dynamic Spatial Simulation of Land-use/Cover Change in the Yucatán Peninsula, Mexico. Presented at 4th International Conference on Integrating GIS and Environmental Modeling GIS/EM4, Banff, Alberta, Canada, 2000.
2. Parker, D. C., and T. Filatova. A Conceptual Design for a Bilateral Agent- Based Land Market with Heterogeneous Economic Agents. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, Vol. 32, No. 6, 2008, pp. 454-463.
3. Millington, J., R. Romero-Calcerrada, J. Wainwright, and G. Perry. An Agent-Based Model of Mediterranean Agricultural Land-Use/Cover Change for Examining Wildfire Risk. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Vol. 11, No. 4, 2008, pp. 4-32. http://jasss.soc.surrey. ac.uk/11/4/4/4.pdf Accessed July 5, 2010.
4. Zhou, B., and K. M. Kockelman. Land Use Change Through Microsimulation of Market Dynamics: An Agent-Based Model of Land Development and Locator Bidding in Austin, Texas. Proc., 56th Annual Meetings of the North American Regional Science Association International, San Francisco, Calif., 2010.
5. Parker, C. D., T. Berger, and M. S. Manson. Agent-Based Models of Land- Use and Land-Cover Change. Report and Review of an International Workshop, October 4-7, Irvine, Calif., 2001. http://www.globalland project.org/Documents/ LUCC-No-6.pdf Accessed June 28, 2010.
6. Verburg, P. H., J. R. Van Eck, T. C. Nijs, and M. J. Dijst. Determinants of Land-Use Change Patterns in the Netherlands. Environmental and Planning B, Vol. 31, No. 1, 2004, pp. 125-150. (Pubitemid 38225621)
7. Zhou, B., and K. M. Kockelman. Neighborhood Impacts on Land Use Change: A Multinomial Logit Model of Spatial Relationships. Annals of Regional Science, Vol. 42, No. 2, 2008, pp. 321-340. (Pubitemid 351638707)
8. Waddell, P., A. Borning, M. Noth, N. Freier, M. Becke, and F. Ulfarsson. Microsimulation of Urban Development and Location Choices: Design and Implementation of UrbanSim. Networks and Spatial Economics, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2003, pp. 43-67.
9. Wang, X., and K. M. Kockelman. Bayesian Inference for Ordered Response Data with a Dynamic Spatial-Ordered Probit Model. Journal of Regional Science, Vol. 49, No. 5, 2009, pp. 877-913.
10. LeSage, J., and K. Pace. Introduction to Spatial Econometrics. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, Fla., 2009.
11. Tobler, W. A Computer Movie Simulating Urban Growth in the Detroit Region. Economic Geography, Vol. 46, No. 2, 1970, pp. 234-240.
12. Wang, X. Capturing Patterns of Spatial and Temporal Autocorrelation in Land Use/Land Cover Change Data: An Austin Case Study. PhD dissertation. University of Texas at Austin, 2007.
13. Lichstein, J. W., T. R. Simons, S. A. Shriner, and K. E. Franzreb. Spatial Autocorrelation and Autoregressive Models in Ecology. Ecological Monographs, Vol. 72, No. 3, 2003, pp. 445-463.
14. Anselin, L., R. Florax, and S. J. Rey. Advances in Spatial Econometrics. Methodology, Tools and Applications. Springer Inc., Berlin, 2004.
15. Chakir, R., and O. Parent. Determinants of Land Use Changes: A Spatial Multinomial Probit Approach. Papers in Regional Science, Vol. 88, No. 2, 2009, pp. 327-344.
16. Munroe, D. K., J. Southworth, and C. M. Tucker. The Dynamics of Land- Cover Change in Western Honduras: Exploring Spatial and Temporal Complexity. Agricultural Economics, Vol. 27, No. 3, 2002, pp. 355-369. (Pubitemid 35464805)
17. Wang, X., and K. M. Kockelman. Application of the Dynamic Spatial Ordered Probit Model: Patterns of Land Development Change in Austin, Texas. Regional Science, Vol. 88, No. 2, 2009, pp. 345-366.
18. Wang, X., and K. M. Kockelman. Application of Dynamic Spatial Ordered Probit Model: Patterns of Ozone Concentration in Austin, Texas. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2136, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 45-56.
19. Hadayeghi, A., A. Shalaby, and B. Persaud. Development of Planning Level Transportation Safety Tools Using Geographically Weighted Poisson Regression. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 42, No. 2, 2009, pp. 676-688.
20. Páez, A. Exploring Contextual Variations in Land Use and Transport Analysis Using a Probit Model with Geographical Weights. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 14, No. 3, 2006, pp. 167-176.
21. Fotheringham, S. Geographically Weighted Regression: The Analysis of Spatially Varying Relationships. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., West Sussex, England, 2003.
22. Platt, R. Global and Local Analysis of Fragmentation in a Mountain Region of Colorado. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment, Vol. 101, No. 2-3, 2004, pp. 207-218. (Pubitemid 38215232)
23. Ognev-Himmelberger, Y., H. Pearsall, and R. Rakshit. Concrete Evidence and Geographically Weighted Regression: A Regional Analysis of Wealth and the Land Cover in Massachusetts. Applied Geography, Vol. 29, No. 4, 2009, pp. 478-487.
24. Atkinson, P., S. German, D. Sear, and M. Clark. Exploring the Relations Between Riverbank Erosion and Geomorphological Controls Using Geographically Weighted Logistic Regression. Geographical Analysis, Vol. 35, No. 1, 2003, pp. 58-82. (Pubitemid 36199354)
25. Nakaya, T., S. Fotheringham, C. Brunsdon, and M. Charlton. Geographically Weighted Poisson Regression for Disease Association Mapping. Statistics in Medicine, Vol. 24, No. 17, 2010, pp. 2695-2717. (Pubitemid 41300805)
26. Zhao, F., and N. Park. Using Geographically Weighted Regression Models to Estimate Annual Average Daily Traffic. In Transportation ResearchRecord: Journal of Transportation Research Board, No. 1879, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 99-107. (Pubitemid 40329259)
27. Ghosh, D., and S. Manson. Robust Principal Component Analysis and Geographically Weighted Regression: Urbanization in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. URISA Journal, Vol. 20, No. 1, 2008, pp. 15-25.
28. Luo, J., and K. Nagaraj. Modeling Urban Growth with Geographically Weighted Multinomial Logistic Regression. Proc., Society of Photo- Optical Instrumentation Engineers, 2008. http://spiedigitallibrary.org/proceedings/ resource/2/psisdg/7144/1/71440M-1. Accessed June 10, 2010.
29. McMillen, D. P., and J. F. McDonald. Land Use Before Zoning: The Case of 1920s Chicago. Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol. 29, No. 4, 1999, pp. 473-489. (Pubitemid 29366037)
30. Haider, M., and E. J. Miller. Effects of Transportation Infrastructure and Location on Residential Real Estate Values. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1722, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 1-8.
31. Srour, I., K. M. Kockelman, and T. Dunn. Accessibility Indices: Connection to Residential Land Prices and Location Choice. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1805, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 25-34.
32. Iacono, M., D. Levinson, and A. El-Geneidy. Models of Transportation and Land Use Change: A Guide to the Territory. Journal of Planning Literature, Vol. 22, No. 4, 2008, pp. 323-340.
33. Zhou, B., and K. M. Kockelman. Microsimulation of Residential Land Development and Household Location Choices: Bidding for Land in Austin, Texas. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2077, TransportationResearch Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 106-112.
34. Lin, H., S. L. Kang, M. Espey, and J. Allen. Modeling Urban Sprawl and Land Use Change in a Coastal Area-A Neural Network Approach. Presented at American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Providence, R.I., July 24-27, 2005.
35. Niemeier, D. A. Accessibility: An Evaluation Using Consumer Welfare. Transportation, Vol. 24, No. 4, 1997, pp. 377-396.
36. Greene, W. H. Econometric Analysis, 5th ed. Prentice Hall Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J., 2003.
37. LeSage, J. Applied Econometrics Using MATLAB. 1999. http://www.spatial- econometrics.com/html/mbook.pdf. Accessed July 24, 2010.
38. Ozturk, E., and E. G. Irwin. Explaining Household Location Choices Using a Spatial Probit Model. Presented at Meeting of the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, Chicago, Ill., 2001. http://ageconsearch. umn.edu/bitstream/20626/1/sp01oz01.pdf. Accessed July 21, 2010.
39. Lacombe, D. J., T. M. Shaughnessy, and G. J. Holloway. The Dual Spatial Autoregressive Probit Model with an Application to the 2001 Congressional Farm Bill. Presented at Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, March 2009. http://www.rri.wvu.edu/pdffiles/ Two%20W%20Spatial%20Probit.pdf. Accessed May 5, 2010.
40. Hoshino, T. Implementation of the District Planning System in Japan. Paper presented at 3rd World Conference of the Spatial Econometrics Association, Barcelona, Spain. http://www.ub.edu/sea2009.com/Papers/28.pdf. Accessed July 21, 2010.
41. Beron, K. J., and W. Vijverberg. Probit in a Spatial Context: A Monte Carlo Approach. In Advances in Spatial Econometrics (L. Anselin, and R. Florax, eds.), Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany, 2000.