Microsimulation of residential land development and household location choices: Bidding for land in Austin, Texas

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 2077, 2008, Pages 106-112

  Zhou, Bin ^a   Kockelman, Kara M ^b  

^a 6508 Cockrell Jr Hall   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMERCE; COMPETITION; COSTS;

JOB SITES; LAND DEVELOPMENT; LOCATION CHOICE; MARKET EQUILIBRIUM; MICRO-ECONOMIC THEORY; MICROSIMULATION; MIXED LOGIT MODELS; PRICE COMPETITION; RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT; SPATIAL DATA;

HOUSING;

EID: 61349151698     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2077-14     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Zhou, B., and K. Kockelman. Neighborhood Impacts on Land Use Change: A Multinomial Logit Model of Spatial Relationships. Annals of Regional Science, Vol. 42, No. 2, 2008, pp. 321-340.
2. Schotten, K., R. Goetgeluk, M. Hilferink, P. Rietveld, and H. Scholten. Residential Construction, Land Use and the Environment: Simulations for the Netherlands Using a GIS-Based Land Use Model. Environment Modeling and Assessment, Vol. 6, No. 2, 2001, pp. 133-143.
3. de la Barra, T. Integrated Land Use and Transport Modelling: Decision Chains and Hierarchies. Cambridge University Press, New York, 1989.
4. Wingo, L. Transportation and. Urban Land Use. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Md., 1961.
5. Alonso, W. Location and Land Use. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1964.
6. Herbert, J., and B. Stevens. A Model of the Distribution of Residential Activity in Urban Areas. Journal of Regional Science, Vol. 2, No. 2, 1960, pp. 21-36.
7. Senior, M., and A. Wilson. Explorations and Syntheses of Linear Programming and Spatial Interaction Models of Residential Location. Geographical Analysis, Vol. 6, 1974, pp. 209-238.
8. Anas, A., and R. Xu. Congestion, Land Use, and Job Dispersion: A General Equilibrium Model. Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 45, No. 3, 1999, pp. 451-473.
9. Chang, J., and R. Mackett. A Bi-Level Model of the Relationship Between Transport and Residential Location. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 40, No. 2, 2005, pp. 123-146.
10. Parker, D. C., S. M. Manson, M. A. Janssen, M. J. Hoffmann, and P. Deadman. Multi-Agent Systems for the Simulation of Land-Use and Land-Cover Change: A Review. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, Vol. 93, No. 2, 2003, pp. 314-340.
11. Pereira, A. G., G. Munda, and M. Panicemi. Generating Alternatives for Sitting Retail and Service Facilities Using Genetic Algorithms and Multiple Criteria Decision Techniques. Journal, of Retailing and Consumer Services, Vol. 1, No. 2, 1994, pp. 40-47.
12. Clarke, K. C., S. Hoppen, and L. Gaydos. A Self-Modifying Cellular Automaton Model of Historical Urbanization in the San Francisco Bay Area. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, Vol. 24, 1997, pp. 247-261.
13. Clarke, K. C., and L. Gaydos. Loose Coupling a Cellular Automaton Model and GIS: Long-Term Growth Prediction for San Francisco and Washington/Baltimore. International Journal of Geographical. Information Science, Vol. 12, No. 7, 1998, pp. 699-714.
14. Raju, K. A., P. K. Sikdar, and S. L. Dhingra. Micro-Simulation of Residential Location Choice and Its Variation. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, Vol. 22, No. 3, 1998, pp. 203-218.
15. Silva, E. A., and K. C. Clarke. Calibration of the SLEUTH Urban Growth Model for Lisbon and Porto, Portugal. Computers, Environment and Urban System, Vol. 26, No. 6, 2002, pp. 525-552.
16. Waddell, P. Exogenous Workplace Choice in Residential Location Models: Is the Assumption Valid? Geographical Analysis, Vol. 25, 1993, pp. 65-82.
17. Waddell, P. UrbanSim: Modeling Urban Development for Land Use, Transportation and Environmental Planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 68, No. 3, 2002, pp. 297-314.
18. Waddell, P., A. Borning, M. Noth, N. Freier, M. Becke, and G. Ulfarsson. Microsimulation of Urban Development and Location Choices: Design and Implementation of UrbanSim. Networks and Spatial. Economics, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2003, pp. 43-67.
19. Van Ommeren, J., P. Rietveld, and P. Nijkamp. Job Moving, Residential Moving, and Commuting: A Search Perspective. Journal, of Urban Economics, Vol. 46, No. 2, 1999, pp. 230-253.
20. Rouwendal, J., and E. Meijer. Preferences for Housing, Jobs, and Commuting: A Mixed Logit Analysis. Journal of Regional Science, Vol. 41, No. 3, 2001, pp. 475-505.
21. Clark, W. A. V., Y. Huang, and S. Withers. Does Commuting Distance Matter? Commuting Tolerance and Residential Change. Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol. 33, No. 2, 2003, pp. 199-221.
22. Tillema, T., D. Ettema, and B. van Wee. Road Pricing and (Re)Location Decisions of Households. Presented at 85th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2006.
23. Gregor, B. Land Use Scenario Developer: Practical Land Use Model Using a Stochastic Microsimulation Framework. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2003, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 93-102.
24. Abraham, J. E., and J. D. Hunt. Specification and Estimation of Nested Logit Model of Home, Workplaces, and Commuter Modes Choice by Multiple-Worker Households. In Transportation Research Record 1606, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 17-24.
25. Ben-Akiva, M., and J. L. Bowman. Integration of an Activity-Based Model System and a Residential Location Model. Urban Studies, Vol. 35, No. 7, 1998, pp. 1131-1153.
26. Galilea, P., and J. de Dios Ortúzar. Valuing Noise Level Reductions in a Residential Location Context. Transportation Research Part D, Vol. 10, No. 4, 2005, pp. 305-322.
27. Bina, M., and K. Kockelman. Location Choice vis-à-vis Transportation: The Case of Recent Home Buyers. Presented at 11th International Conference of the International Association of Travel Behavior Research, Japan, 2006.
28. Jiao, P., and N. Harata. Residential Location Choice Behavior for Different Households: Methodology and Case Study in Dalian, China. Presented at 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C., 2007.
29. Tu, Y., and J. Goldfinch. A Two-Stage Housing Choice Forecasting Model. Urban. Studies, Vol. 33, No. 3, 1996, pp. 517-537.
30. Rapaport, C. Housing Demand and Community Choice: an Empirical Analysis. Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 42, No. 2, 1997, pp. 243-260.
31. Chattopadhyay, S. The Effectiveness of McFadden's Nested Logit Model in Valuing Amenity Improvement. Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol. 30, No. 1, 2000, pp. 23-43.
32. McFadden, D. Modelling the Choice of Residential Location. In Spatial Interaction Theory and Residential Location (A. Karlquist et al., eds.), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1978, pp. 75-96.
33. Hunt, J. D., J. D. P. McMillan, and J. E. Abraham. Stated. Preference Investigation of Influences on Attractiveness of Residential Locations. In Transportation Research Record 1466, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994, pp. 79-87.
34. Sermons, M. W., and F. S. Koppelman. Representing the Differences Between Female and Male Commute Behavior in Residential Location Choice Models. Jourtuil of Transport Geography, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2001, pp. 101-110.
35. Train, K. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge University Press, New York, 2003.
36. Lee, J., and D. Wong. Statistical Analysis with Arcview GIS. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 2000.