Application of the dynamic spatial ordered probit model: Patterns of land development change in Austin, Texas

Papers in Regional Science

Volumn 88, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 345-365

  Wang, Xiaokun ^a   Kockelman, Kara M ^b  

^a BUCKNELL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Land development; Ordered discrete response data; Spatial autocorrelation; Temporal dependency

Indexed keywords

AUTOCORRELATION; CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT; LAND MANAGEMENT; LAND USE PLANNING; PARAMETERIZATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PREDICTION; SATELLITE IMAGERY; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; URBAN AREA;

AUSTIN; NORTH AMERICA; TEXAS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 67650165380     PISSN: 10568190     EISSN: 14355957     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1435-5957.2009.00249.x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Anselin L (1999) Spatial econometrics. Working paper. Accessed 10 July, 2005. URL: http://www.csiss.org/learning_resources/content/papers/ baltchap.pdf
2. Canda J, Rasmussen S, Clarke KC (2000) A coupled cellular automaton model for land use/land cover dynamics. Accessed 10 July, 2005. URL: http://www.geog.ucsb.edu/~kclarke/ucime/banff2000/533-jc-paper.htm
3. Case A (1992) Neighbourhood influence and technological-change. Regional Science and Urban Economics 22: 491-508
4. Celeux G, Forbes F, Robert CP, Titterington DM (2006) Deviance information criteria for missing data models. Technical report. Accessed 10 May, 2007. URL: http://www.ceremade.dauphine.fr/~xian/cfrt05.pdf
5. Cliff A, Ord J (1981) Spatial processes, models and applications. Pion, London
6. Dubin R (1995) Estimating logit models with spatial dependence. In: Anselin L, Florax RJGM (eds), New directions in spatial econometrics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin
7. Gelfand AE, Smith AFM (1990) Sampling-based approaches to calculating marginal densities. Journal of the American Statistical Association 85: 398-409
8. Girard P, Parent E (2001) Bayesian analysis of autocorrelated ordered categorical data for industrial quality monitoring. Technometrics 43: 180-191
9. Greene W (2005) Econometric analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ, Prentice-Hall
10. Kalmanje S, Kockelman K (2004) Credit-Based Congestion Pricing: Travel, Land Value, & Welfare Impacts. Transportation Research Record 1864: 45-53
11. Kotz S, Johnson N (1982) Encyclopedia of statistical sciences. John Wiley & Sons, New York
12. Landis J, Guhathakurta S, Huang W, Zhang M, Fukuji B, Sen S (1995) Rail transit investments, real estate values, and land use change: A comparative analysis of five California Rail Transit Systems. Working paper. Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California at Berkley
13. McKay MD (1995) Evaluating prediction uncertainty. Technical Report NUREG/CR-6311, U. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Los Alamos National Laboratory
14. McMillen DP (1992) Probit with spatial autocorrelation. Journal of Regional Science 32: 335-348
15. Moran PAP (1950) Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika 37: 17-23
16. Munroe D, Southworth J, Tucker CM (2001) The dynamics of land-cover change in western Honduras: Spatial autocorrelation and temporal variation. Conference Proceedings. American Agricultural Economics Association. AAEA-CAES 2001 Annual Meeting. Accessed 10 July, 2004. URL: http://agecon.lib.umn.edu/cgi-bin/pdf_view.pl?paperid=2611
17. Nelson GC, Hellerstein D (1997) Do roads cause deforestation: Using satellite images in econometric analysis of land use. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79: 80-88
18. Paez A (2006) Exploring contextual variations in land use and transport analysis using a probit model with geographical weights. Journal of Transport Geography 14: 167-176
19. Paez, A, Suzuki J (2001) Transportation impacts on land use change: An assessment considering neighborhood effects. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies 4: 47-59
20. Schrank D, Lomax T (2005) The 2005 urban mobility report. Accessed 1 June, 2007. URL: http://tti.tamu.edu/documents/mobility_report_2005.pdf
21. Smith TE, LeSage JP (2004) A Bayesian probit model with spatial dependencies. In: Pace RK, LeSage JP (eds), Advances in econometrics. Volume 18: Spatial and spatiotemporal econometrics. Elsevier Ltd, Oxford
22. Waddell P (2002) UrbanSim: Modeling urban development for land use, transportation, and environmental planning. The Journal of the American Planning Association 68: 297-314
23. Wang X (2007) Capturing patterns of spatial and temporal autocorrelation in ordered response data: A case study of land use and air quality changes in Austin, Texas. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, The University of Texas, Austin
24. Wang X, Kockelman K (2005) Occupant injury severity using a heteroscedastic ordered logit model: Distinguishing the effects of vehicle weight and type. Transportation Research Record 1908: 195-204
25. Wang X, Kockelman K (2006) Tracking land cover change in a mixed logit model: Recognizing temporal and spatial effects. Transportation Research Record 1977: 112-120
26. Wang X, Kockelman K (2008) Bayesian inference for ordered response data with a dynamic spatial ordered probit (DSOP) model. forthcoming in the Journal of Regional Science
27. Wear DN, Bolstad P (1998) Land-use changes in southern Appalachian landscapes: Spatial analysis and forecast evaluation. Ecosystems 1: 575-594
28. Zhou B, Kockelman K (2008) Neighborhood Impacts on Land Use Change: A Multinomial Logit Model of Spatial Relationships. Annals of Regional Science 42: 321-340