Global and local analysis of fragmentation in a mountain region of Colorado

Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment

Volumn 101, Issue 2-3, 2004, Pages 207-218

  Platt, Rutherford V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

Fragmentation; Geographically weighted regression; Land use change; Land use planning

Indexed keywords

LAND COVER; LAND USE CHANGE; LAND USE PLANNING; MOUNTAIN REGION; URBAN DEVELOPMENT;

COLORADO; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 1242276558     PISSN: 01678809     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2003.09.005     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. American Planning Association Website. Accessed May, 2002. http://www.planning.org/growingsmart/States/Colorado.htm .
2. Anselin, L., 1988. Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
3. Anselin, L., Bera, A., 1998. Spatial dependence in linear regression models with an introduction to spatial econometrics. In: Ullah, A., Giles, D.E.A. (Eds.), Handbook of Applied Economic Statistics. Marcel Dekker, New York.
4. Antrop M. The language of landscape ecologists and planners: a comparative content analysis of concepts used in landscape ecology. Landscape Urban Plan. 55:2001;163-173.
5. Brabec E., Smith C. Agricultural land fragmentation: the spatial effects of three land protection strategies in the eastern United States. Landscape Urban Plan. 58:2002;255-268.
6. Bradshaw T.K., Muller B. Impacts of rapid urban growth on farmland conversion: application of new regional land use policy models and geographical information systems. Rural Sociol. 63(1):1998;1-25.
7. Brunsdon C., Fotheringham A.S., Charlton M.E. Geographically weighted regression: a method for exploring spatial non-stationarity. Geogr. Anal. 28:1996;281-298.
8. Brunsdon C., Fotheringham A.S., Charlton M.E. Spatial nonstationarity and autoregressive models. Environ. Plan. A. 30:1998;957-973.
9. Calthorpe, P., 1993. The Next American Metropolis: Ecology, Community, and the American Dream. Princeton Architectural Press, Princeton.
10. Cassetti E. Generating models by the expansion method. Geogr. Anal. 4:1972;81-91.
11. Cassetti E. The expansion method, mathematical modeling and spatial econometrics. Int. Reg. Sci. Rev. 20:1997;9-32.
12. Cleveland W.S. Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 83:1979;596-610.
13. Dramstad, W.E., Olson, J.D., Foreman, R.T.T., 1997. Landscape Ecology Principles in Landscape Architecture and Land-Use Planning. Island Press, Washington, DC.
14. Duncan C., Jones K. Using multilevel models to model heterogeneity: potential and pitfalls. Geogr. Anal. 32:2000;279-305.
15. Fotheringham A.S., Brunsdon C. Local forms of spatial analysis. Geogr. Anal. 31:1999;340-358.
16. Fotheringham A.S., Charlton M.E., Brunsdon C. Geographically weighted regression: a natural evolution of the expansion method for spatial data analysis. Environ. Plan. A. 30:1998;1905-1927.
17. Fotheringham, A.S., Brunsdon, C., Charlton, M.E., 2000. Quantitative Geography: Perspectives on Spatial Data Analysis. Sage Publications Ltd., London.
18. Gould M., Jones K., Moon G. Guest editorial: the scope of multilevel models. Environ. Plan. A. 29(4):1997;581-584.
19. Grimm N.B., Grove J.M., Pickett S.T.A., Redman C.L. Integrated approaches to long-term studies of urban ecological systems. BioScience. 50(7):2000;571-584.
20. Huber, P., 1981. Robust Statistics. Wiley, New York.
21. Irwin N., Geoghegan N. Theory, data, methods: developing spatially explicit economic models of land use change. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 84(1-3):2001;91-98.
22. Johnson M.P. Environmental impacts of urban sprawl: a survey of the literature and proposed research agenda. Environ. Plan. A. 33:2001;717-735.
23. Klepeis P., Turner B.L. Integrated land history and global change science: the example of the southern Yucatan peninsular region project. Land Use Policy. 18(1):2001;239-272.
24. Knight, R.L., Clark, T.W., 1998. Ecological effects of administrative boundaries. In: Knight, R.L., Landres, P.B. (Eds.), Stewardship Across Boundaries. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp. 39-64.
25. Lambin E.F., Turner B.L.et al. The causes of land-use and land-cover change: moving beyond the myths. Glob. Environ. Change-Human Policy Dimen. 11(4):2001;261-269.
26. Landis J., Zhang M. The second generation of the California urban futures model. Part 1. Model logic and theory. Environ. Plan. B. 25(5):1998;657-666.
27. Lutz, C., 2000. A new town hits the skids. High Country News 32 (5).
28. Musacchio L.R., Coulson R.N. Landscape ecological planning process for wetland, waterfowl, and farmland conservation. Landscape Urban Plan. 56:2001;125-147.
29. Olff H., Ritchie M.E. Fragmented nature: consequences for biodiversity. Landscape Urban Plan. 58:2002;83-92.
30. Páez A., Tchida T., Miyamoto K. A general framework for estimation and inference of geographically weighted regression models. 2. Spatial association and model specification tests. Environ. Plan. A. 34:2002;883-904.
31. Riebsame W.E., Gosnell H., Theobald D.M. Land use and landscape change in the Colorado Mountains. 1. Theory, scale, and pattern, and pattern. Mountain Res. Dev. 16:1996;395-405.
32. Schneider L.C., Pontius R.G. Modeling land-use change in the Ipswich watershed, Massachusetts, USA. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 85(1-3):2001;83-94.
33. Serneels S., Lambin E.F. Proximate causes of land-use change in Narok District, Kenya: a spatial statistical model. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 85(1-3):2001;65-81.
34. The Sprawl Site. Accessed May, 2002. http://www.thesprawlsite.com .
35. Theobald D.M., Hobbs N.T. Forecasting rural land use change: a comparison of regression and spatial-transition models. Geogr. Environ. Model. 2:1998;57-74.