Cross validation for selection of cortical interaction models from scalp EEG or MEG

IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 59, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 504-514

  Cheung, Bing Leung Patrick ^a   Nowak, Robert ^a   Lee, Hyong Chol ^b   Drongelen, Wim ^b   Veen, Barry D ^a  

^a University of Wisconsin Madison   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Cross validation (CV); effective connectivity; Granger causality; model selection; state space model

Indexed keywords

CROSS VALIDATION; EFFECTIVE CONNECTIVITY; GRANGER CAUSALITY; MODEL SELECTION; STATE-SPACE MODELS;

DATA HANDLING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EQUATIONS OF STATE; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY;

COMPUTER SIMULATION;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CELL INTERACTION; CORTICAL INTERACTION MODEL; CROSS VALIDATION; ELECTROCORTICOGRAPHY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EPILEPSY; HUMAN; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; SCALP; SIMULATION; VALIDATION PROCESS;

BRAIN; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EPILEPSY; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SCALP;

EID: 84862948880     PISSN: 00189294     EISSN: 15582531     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2011.2174991     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. K. Friston, "Functional and effective connectivity: A review," Brain Connect, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 13-36, 2011.
2. S. Bressler, M. Ding, and W. Yang, "Investigation of cooperative cortical dynamics by multivariate autoregressive modeling of event-related local field potentials," Neurocomputing, vol. 26-27, pp. 625-631, 1999.
3. C. Bernasconi and P. Konig, "On the directionality of cortical interactions studied by structural analysis of electrophysiological recordings," Biol. Cybern., vol. 81, pp. 199-210, 1999.
4. A. Brovelli, M. Ding, A. Ledberg, Y. Chen, R. Nakamura, and S. Bressler, "Beta osciallations in a large-scale sensorimotor cortical network: Directional influences revealed by granger causality," Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., vol. 101, no. 26, pp. 9849-9854, 2004.
5. W. Freiwald, P. Valdes, J. Bosch, R. Biscay, J. Jimenez, L. Rodriguez, V. Rodriguez, A. Kreiter, and W. Singer, "Testing non-linearity and directedness of interactions between neural groups in the macaque inferotemporal cortex," J. Neurosci. Methods, vol. 94, pp. 105-119, 1999.
6. D. Marinazzo, W. Liao, H. Chen, and S. Stramaglia, "Nonlinear connectivity by Granger causality," NeuroImage, vol. 58, pp. 330-338, 2010.
7. D. Nykamp and D. Tranchina, "A population density approach that facilitates large-scale modeling of neural networks: Analysis and an application to orientation tuning," J. Comput. Neurosci., vol. 8, pp. 19-50, 2000.
8. K. J. Friston, L. Harrison, and W. Penny, "Dynamic causal modelling," NeuroImage, vol. 19, pp. 1273-1302, 2003.
9. O.David and K. J. Friston, "A neural mass model for MEG/EEG:Coupling and neuronal dynamics," NeuroImage, vol. 20, pp. 1743-1755, 2003.
10. L. Astolfi, F. Cincotti, D. Mattia, M. Marciani, L. Baccala, F. de Vico Fallani, S. Salinari, M. Ursino, M. Zavaglia, L. Ding, J. Edgar, G. Miller, B. He, and F. Babiloni, "Comparison of different cortical connectivity estimators for high-resolution EEG recordings," Human Brain Mapping, vol. 28, pp. 143-157, Feb. 2007.
11. H. Hui, D. Pantazis, S. Bressler, and R. Leahy, "Identifying true cortical interactions inMEGusing the nulling beamformer," NeuroImage, vol. 49, pp. 3161-3174, Feb. 2010.
12. B. L. Cheung, B. Riedner, G. Tononi, and B. Van Veen, "Estimation of cortical connectivity from EEG using state-space models," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 57, no. 9, pp. 2122-2134, Sep. 2010.
13. L. Astolfi, F. Cincotti, D. Mattia, M. Marciani, L. Baccala, F. de Vico Fallani, S. Salinari, M. Ursino, M. Zavaglia, and F. Babiloni, "Assessing cortical functional connectivity by partial directed coherence: Simulations and application to real data," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 1802-1812, Sep. 2006.
14. A. C. Marreiros, S. J. Kiebel, and K. J. Friston, "A dynamic causal model study of neuronal population dynamics," NeuroImage, vol. 51, pp. 91-101, 2010.
15. H. Akaike, "A new look at the statistical model identification, " IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, vol. AC-19, no. 6, pp. 716-723, Dec. 1974.
16. G. Schwarz, "Estimating the dimension of a model," Ann. Stat., vol. 6, pp. 461-464, 1978.
17. B. Efron, "Estimating the error rate of a prediction rule: improvement on cross-validation," J. Amer. Stat. Assoc., vol. 78, pp. 316-331, 1983.
18. L.Wasserman, "Bayesian model selection and model averaging," J.Math. Psychol., vol. 44, pp. 92-107, 2000.
19. M. Stone, "Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions," J. Royal Stat. Soc., Series B, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 111-147, 1974.
20. S. Geisser, "The predictive sample reuse method with applications," J. Amer. Stat. Assoc., no. 350, pp. 320-328, 1975.
21. J. Shao, "Linear model selection by cross-validation," J. Amer. Stat. Assoc., vol. 88, no. 422, pp. 486-494, 1993.
22. A.W. van derVaart, S. Dudoit, andM. J. van der Laan, "Oracle inequalities for multi-fold cross validation," Stat. Decis., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 351-371, 2006.
23. M. J. van der Laan, E. Polley, and A. E. Hubbard, "Super learner," Stat. Appl. Genetics Molecular Biol., vol. 6, no. 1, 2007, Art. 25. Available: http://www.bepress.com/sagmb/vol6/iss1/art25/
24. S. Baillet, J. Mosher, and R. Leahy, "Electromagnetic brain mapping," IEEE Signal Process. Mag., vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 14-30, Nov. 2001.
25. G. Nolte and G. Curio, "Current multipole expansion to estimate lateral extent of neuronal activity: A theoretical analysis," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 47, no. 10, pp. 1347-1355, Oct. 2000.
26. T. Limpiti, B. Van Veen, and R. Wakai, "Cortical patch basis model for spatially extended neural activity," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 1740-1754, Sep. 2006.
27. D. Stoffer and K.Wall, "Bootstrapping state-space models:Gaussian maximum likelihood estimation and the Kalman filter," J. Amer. Stat. Assoc., vol. 86, no. 416, pp. 1024-1033, 1991.
28. S. Haykin, "Kalman filters," in Kalman Filtering and Neural Networks, S. Haykin, Ed. New York: Wiley, 2001, ch. 1, pp. 1-21.
29. B. Anderson and J. Moore, Optimal Filtering. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1979.
30. A. Doucet, S. J. Godsill, and C. Andrieu, "On sequential monte carlo sampling methods for bayesian filtering," Stat. Comput., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 197-208, 2000.
31. R. Shumway, Applied Statistical Time Series Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1988.
32. B. L. Cheung and B. Van Veen, "Estimation of cortical connectivity from E/MEG using nonlinear state-space models," in Proc. 36th Int. Conf. Acoust., Speech Signal Process., Prague, Czech Republic, May 2011, pp. 769-772.
33. S. Bressler, C. Richter, Y. Chen, and M. Ding, "Cortical functional network organization from autoregressive modeling of local field potential oscillations," Stat. Med., vol. 26, pp. 3875-3885, 2007.
34. N. Ancona and S. Stramaglia, "An invariance property of predictors in kernel-induced hypothesis spaces," Neural Comput., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 749-759, 2006.
35. J. Park and I. W. Sandberg, "Universal approximation using radial-basis function networks," Neural Comput., vol. 3, pp. 246-257, 1991.
36. N. Ancona, D. Marinazzo, and S. Stramaglia, "Radial basis function approach to nonlinear Granger causality of time series," Phys. Rev. E, vol. 70, pp. 56 221-56 227, 2004.
37. B. Van Veen, W. van Drongelen, M. Yuchtman, and A. Suzuki, "Localization of brain electrical activity via linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filtering," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 44, no. 9, pp. 867-880, Sep. 1997.
38. M. Ding, Y. Chen, and L. Bressler, "Granger causality: Basic theory and application to neuroscience," in Handbook of Time Series Analysis, B. Schelter, M. Winterhalder, and J. Timmer, Eds. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley, 2006, ch. 17, pp. 437-459.
39. O. Nelles, Nonlinear System Identification. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 2001.
40. R. Shumway and D. Stoffer, "An approach to time series smoothing and forecasting using the EM algorithm," J. Time Series Anal., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 253-264, 1982.
41. S. Roweis and Z. Ghahramani, "Learning nonlinear dynamical system using the expectation-maximization algorithm," in Kalman Filtering and Neural Networks, S.Haykin, Ed. NewYork:Wiley, 2001, ch. 6, pp. 175-220.
42. A. Dempster, N. Laird, and D. Rubin, "Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm," J. Royal Stat. Soc., Series B, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 1-38, 1977.
43. H. Rauch, F. Tung, and C. Stiebel, "Maximum likelihood estimates of linear dynamic systems," AIAA J., vol. 3, pp. 1445-1450, 1965.
44. S. Schiff, P. So, T. Chang, R. Burke, and T. Sauer, "Detecting dynamical interdependence and generalized synchrony through mutual prediction in a neural ensemble," Phys. Rev. E, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 6708-6724, 1996.
45. R. Salazar, P. Konig, and C. Kayser, "Directed interactions between visual areas and their role in processing image structure and expectancy," Eur. J. Neurosci., vol. 20, pp. 1391-1401, 2004.
46. P. Stoica and Y. Selen, "Model-order selection," IEEE Signal Process. Mag., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 36-47, Jul. 2004.
47. Y. Chen, S. Bressler, and M. Ding, "Frequency decomposition of conditional granger causality and application to multivariate neural field potential data," J. Neurosci. Methods, vol. 150, pp. 228-237, 2006.
48. J. M. Bernardo and A. F.M. Smith, Bayesian Theory. New York: Wiley, 2000.