Cortical functional network organization from autoregressive modeling of local field potential oscillations

Statistics in Medicine

Volumn 26, Issue 21, 2007, Pages 3875-3885

  Bressler, Steven L ^a   Richter, Craig G ^a   Chen, Yonghong ^b   Ding, Mingzhou ^b  

^a FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b University of Florida   (United States)

Author keywords

Cerebral cortex; Coherence; Granger causality; Local field potential

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN MAPPING; CONFERENCE PAPER; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; MALE; MONKEY; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NONHUMAN; OSCILLATORY POTENTIAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SENSORIMOTOR CORTEX; SENSORIMOTOR INTEGRATION; SPECTROSCOPY; STATISTICAL MODEL; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ANIMALS; BRAIN MAPPING; CEREBRAL CORTEX; ELECTRODES, IMPLANTED; EVOKED POTENTIALS; MACACA MULATTA; MALE; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 34548436202     PISSN: 02776715     EISSN: 10970258     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sim.2935     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (73)

1. Gersch W, Yonemoto J. Parametric time series models for multivariate EEG analysis. Computers and Biomedical Research 1977; 10:113-125.
2. Franaszczuk PJ, Blinowska KJ, Kowalczyk M. The application of parametric multichannel spectral estimates in the study of electrical brain activity. Biological Cybernetics 1985; 51:239-247.
3. Wright JJ, Kydd RR, Sergejew AA. Autoregression models of EEG. Results compared with expectations for a multilinear near-equilibrium biophysical process. Biological Cybernetics 1990; 62:201-210.
4. Florian G, Pfurtscheller G. Dynamic spectral analysis of event-related EEG data. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1995; 95:393-396.
5. Liberati D, Cursi M, Locatelli T, Comi G, Cerutti S. Total and partial coherence analysis of spontaneous and evoked EEG by means of multi-variable autoregressive processing. Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing 1997; 35:124-130.
6. Schlogl A, Flotzinger D, Pfurtscheller G. Adaptive autoregressive modeling used for single-trial EEG classification. Biomedizinische Technik (Berl) 1997; 42:162-167.
7. Arnold M, Miltner WH, Witte H, Bauer R, Braun C. Adaptive AR modeling of nonstationary time series by means of Kalman filtering. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 1998; 45:553-562.
8. Ding M, Bressler SL, Yang W, Liang H. Short-window spectral analysis of cortical event-related potentials by adaptive multivariate autoregressive modeling: data preprocessing, model validation, and variability assessment. Biological Cybernetics 2000; 83:35-45.
9. Moller E, Schack B, Arnold M, Witte H. Instantaneous multivariate EEG coherence analysis by means of adaptive high-dimensional autoregressive models. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 2001; 105:143-158.
10. Cassidy MJ, Brown P. Hidden Markov based autoregressive analysis of stationary and non-stationary electrophysiological signals for functional coupling studies. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 2002; 116: 35-53.
11. Harrison L, Penny WD, Friston K. Multivariate autoregressive modeling of fMRI time series. Neuroimage 2003; 19:1477-1491.
12. Goebel R, Roebroeck A, Kim DS, Formisano E. Investigating directed cortical interactions in time-resolved fMRI data using vector autoregressive modeling and Granger causality mapping. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2003; 21:1251-1261.
13. Valdes-Sosa PA, Sanchez-Bornot JM, Lage-Castellanos A, Vega-Hernandez M, Bosch-Bayard J, Melie-Garcia L, Canales-Rodriguez E. Estimating brain functional connectivity with sparse multivariate autoregression. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 2005; 360:969-981.
14. Bressler SL, Ding M, Yang W. Investigation of cooperative cortical dynamics by multivariate autoregressive modeling of event-related local field potentials. Neurocomputing 1999; 26-27:625-631.
15. Kaminski M, Ding M, Truccolo WA, Bressler SL. Evaluating causal relations in neural systems: granger causality, directed transfer function and statistical assessment of significance. Biological Cybernetics 2001; 85:145-157.
16. Liang H, Bressler SL, Ding M, Truccolo WA, Nakamura R. Synchronized activity in prefrontal cortex during anticipation of visuomotor processing. Neuroreport 2002; 13:2011-2015.
17. Brovelli A, Ding M, Ledberg A, Chen Y, Nakamura R, Bressler SL. Beta oscillations in a large-scale sensorimotor cortical network: directional influences revealed by Granger causality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2004; 101:9849-9854.
18. Chen Y, Bressler SL, Ding M. Frequency decomposition of conditional Granger causality and application to multivariate neural field potential data. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 2006; 150:228-237.
19. Ding M, Chen Y, Bressler SL. Granger causality: basic theory and application to neuroscience. In Handbook of Time Series Analysis, Winterhalder M, Schelter B, Timmer J (eds). Wiley-VCH: Berlin, 2006; 437-460.
20. DeFelipe J, Alonso-Nanclares L, Arellano JI. Microstructure of the neocortex: comparative aspects. Journal of Neurocytology 2002; 31:299-316.
21. Douglas RJ, Koch C, Mahowald M, Martin KA, Suarez HH. Recurrent excitation in neocortical circuits. Science 1995; 269:981-985.
22. Shu Y, Hasenstaub A, Duque A, Yu Y, McCormick DA. Modulation of intracortical synaptic potentials by presynaptic somatic membrane potential. Nature 2006; 441:761-765. DOI:10.1038/ nature04720
23. Grinvald A, Arieli A, Tsodyks M, Kenet T. Neuronal assemblies: single cortical neurons are obedient members of a huge orchestra. Biopolymers 2003; 68:422-436.
24. Harris KD. Neural signatures of cell assembly organization. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2005; 6:399-407.
25. Bressler SL. Large-scale cortical networks and cognition. Brain Research Reviews 1995; 20:288-304.
26. Bressler SL, Tognoli E. Operational principles of neurocognitive networks. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2006; 60:139-148. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.12.008
27. Elul R. The genesis of the EEG. International Review of Neurobiology 1972; 15:227-272.
28. Speckmann EJ. Generation of field potentials in the brain. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 1997; 37:8S-10S.
29. Freeman WJ. Mesoscopic neurodynamics: from neuron to brain. Journal of Physiology, Paris 2000; 94:303-322.
30. Bressler SL, Ding M. Event-related potentials. In Wiley Encyclopedia of Biomedical Engineering, Akay M (ed.). Wiley: Hoboken, 2006; DOI:10.1002/9780471740360.ebs 0455
31. Arieli A, Sterkin A, Grinvald A, Aertsen A. Dynamics of ongoing activity: explanation of the large variability in evoked cortical responses. Science 1996; 273:1868-1871.
32. Leopold DA, Logothetis NK. Spatial patterns of spontaneous local field activity in the monkey visual cortex. Reviews in the Neurosciences 2003; 14:195-205.
33. Bressler SL, Coppola R, Nakamura R. Episodic multiregional cortical coherence at multiple frequencies during visual task performance. Nature 1993; 366:153-156.
34. Baker SN, Kilner JM, Pinches EM, Lemon RN. The role of synchrony and oscillations in the motor output. Experimental Brain Research 1999; 128:109-117.
35. von Stein A, Sarnthein J. Different frequencies for different scales of cortical integration: from local gamma to long range alpha/theta synchronization. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2000; 38:301-313.
36. Bressler SL, Kelso JA. Cortical coordination dynamics and cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2001; 5:26-36.
37. Varela F, Lachaux JP, Rodriguez E, Martinerie J. The brainweb: phase synchronization and large-scale integration. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2001; 2:229-239.
38. Brown P, Marsden JF. Cortical network resonance and motor activity in humans. The Neuroscientist 2001; 7:518-527.
39. Tallon-Baudry C, Bertrand O, Fischer C. Oscillatory synchrony between human extrastriate areas during visual short-term memory maintenance. Journal of Neuroscience 2001; 21:RC177.
40. Schack B, Rappelsberger P, Weiss S, Moller E. Adaptive phase estimation and its application in EEG analysis of word processing. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 1999; 93:49-59.
41. Wiener N. The theory of prediction. In Modern Mathematics for Engineers, Chapter 8, Beckenbach EF (ed.). McGraw-Hill: New York, 1956.
42. Granger CWJ. Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 1969; 37:424-438.
43. Bernasconi C, Konig P. On the directionality of cortical interactions studied by structural analysis of electrophysiological recordings. Biological Cybernetics 1999; 81:199-210.
44. Sameshima K, Baccala LA. Using partial directed coherence to describe neuronal ensemble interactions. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 1999; 94:93-103.
45. Freiwald WA, Valdes P, Bosch J, Biscay R, Jimenez JC, Rodriguez LM, Rodriguez V, Kreiter AK, Singer W. Testing non-linearity and directedness of interactions between neural groups in the macaque inferotemporal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 1999; 94:105-119.
46. Bernasconi C, von Stein A, Chiang C, Konig P. Bi-directional interactions between visual areas in the awake behaving cat. Neuroreport 2000; 11:689-692.
47. Chavez M, Martinerie J, Le Van Quyen M. Statistical assessment of nonlinear causality: application to epileptic EEG signals. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 2003; 124:113-128.
48. Hesse W, Moller E, Arnold M, Schack B. The use of time-variant EEG Granger causality for inspecting directed interdependencies of neural assemblies. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 2003; 124:27-44.
49. Goebel R, Roebroeck A, Kim DS, Formisano E. Investigating directed cortical interactions in time-resolved fMRI data using vector autoregressive modeling and Granger causality mapping. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2003; 21:1251-1261.
50. Blinowska KJ, Kus R, Kaminski M. Granger causality and information flow in multivariate processes. Physical Review E Statistical Nonlinear, Soft Matter Physics 2004; 70:050902. DOI: 10.1103/ PhysRevE.70.050902
51. Valdes-Sosa PA. Spatio-temporal autoregressive models defined over brain manifolds. Neuroinformatics 2004; 2:239-250.
52. Schelter B, Winterhalder M, Eichler M, Peifer M, Hellwig B, Guschlbauer B, Lucking CH, Dahlhaus R, Timmer J. Testing for directed influences among neural signals using partial directed coherence. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 2006; 152:210-219.
53. Roebroeck A, Formisano E, Goebel R. Mapping directed influence over the brain using Granger causality and fMRI. Neuroimage 2005; 25:230-242.
54. Seth AK. Causal connectivity of evolved neural networks during behavior. Network 2005; 16:35-54.
55. Abler B, Roebroeck A, Goebel R, Hose A, Schonfeldt-Lecuona C, Hole G, Walter H. Investigating directed influences between activated brain areas in a motor-response task using fMRI. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2006; 24:181-185.
56. Geweke J. Measurement of linear dependence and feedback between multiple time series. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1982; 77:304-313.
57. Bressler SL, Richter CG, Chen Y, Ding M. Top-down cortical influences in visual expectation. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 2006; 384-390.
58. Buzsaki G, Draguhn A. Neuronal oscillations in cortical networks. Science 2004; 304:1926-1929.
59. Schnitzler A, Gross J. Normal and pathological oscillatory communication in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2005 6:285-296.
60. Blair RC, Karniski W. An alternative method for significance testing of waveform difference potentials. Psychophysiology 1993; 30:518-524.
61. Baker SN, Pinches EM, Lemon RN. Synchronization in monkey motor cortex during a precision grip task. II. Effect of oscillatory activity on corticospinal output. Journal of Neurophysiology 2003; 89:1941-1953.
62. Ungerleider LG, Mishkin M. Two cortical visual systems. In Analysis of Visual Behavior, Ingle DJ, Goodale MA, Mansfield RJW (eds). MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 1982; 549-586.
63. Felleman DJ, Van Essen DC. Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. Cerebral Cortex 1991; 1:1-47.
64. Rushworth MF, Nixon PD, Passingham RE. Parietal cortex and movement. I. Movement selection and reaching. Experimental Brain Research 1997; 117:292-310.
65. Sporns O, Tononi G, Edelman GM. Theoretical neuroanatomy: relating anatomical and functional connectivity in graphs and cortical connection matrices. Cerebral Cortex 2000; 10:127-141.
66. Sporns O, Kotter R. Motifs in brain networks. PLoS Biology 2004; 2:e369.
67. Aoki F, Fetz EE, Shupe L, Lettich E, Ojemann GA. Changes in power and coherence of brain activity in human sensorimotor cortex during performance of visuomotor tasks. Biosystems 2001; 63:89-99.
68. Kristeva-Feige R, Fritsch C, Timmer J, Lucking CH. Effects of attention and precision of exerted force on beta range EEG-EMG synchronization during a maintained motor contraction task. Clinical Neurophysiology 2002; 113:124-13l.
69. Tallon-Baudry C, Mandon S, Freiwald WA, Kreiter AK. Oscillatory synchrony in the monkey temporal lobe correlates with performance in a visual short-term memory task. Cerebral Cortex 2004; 14:713-720.
70. Gross J, Schmitz F, Schnitzler I, Kessler K, Shapiro K, Hommel B, Schnitzler A. Modulation of long-range neural synchrony reflects temporal limitations of visual attention in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2004; 101:13050-13055.
71. Lee H, Simpson GV, Logothetis NK, Rainer G. Phase locking of single neuron activity to theta oscillations during working memory in monkey extrastriate visual cortex. Neuron 2005; 45:147-156.
72. Bressler SL. Cortical coordination dynamics and the disorganization syndrome in schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology 2003; 28:S35-39.
73. Phillips WA, Silverstein SM. Convergence of biological and psychological perspectives on cognitive coordination in schizophrenia. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2003; 26:65-82.