Interacting with visual poems through AR-based digital artwork

Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 123-137

  Lin, Hao Chiang Koong ^a   Hsieh, Min Chai ^a   Liu, Eric Zhi Feng ^b   Chuang, Tsung Yen ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF TAINAN   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL CENTRAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Augmented reality technique; Digital artwork; Digital poem; System usability scale; Virtual poem

Indexed keywords

EID: 84862940985     PISSN: None     EISSN: 13036521     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Azuma, R. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6, 355-385.
2. Azuma, R., Baillot, Y., & Behringer, R. (2001). Recent advances in augmented reality. IEEE Computers and Graphic, 21, 34-47.
3. Brooke, J. (1986). System usability scale (SUS): a quick-and-dirty method of system evaluation user information. Reading, UK: Digital Equipment Co Ltd.
4. Chang, C. Y., & Lee, G. (2010). A major e-learning project to renovate science leaning environment in Taiwan. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(1), 7-12.
5. Chiang, Y. T., Lin, S. S. J., Cheng, C. Y., & Liu, E. Z. F. (2011). Exploring online game players' flow experiences and positive affect. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(1), 106-114.
6. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory, Chicago: Aldine.
7. Danto, A. C. (1998a). After the end of art: contemporary art and the pale of history. Princeton University Press.
8. Danto, A. C. (1998b). The end of art: A philosophical defense. History and Theory, 37(4), 127-143.
9. Hsieh, M. C., & Lin, H. C. K. (2009), The establishment of an AR-based interactive English vocabulary learning system, ICDC2009, The 2009 International Conference on Digital Content, Chung-Li, Taiwan, Dec. 17-18.
10. Hsieh, M. C., & Lin, H. C. K. (2010), The establishment of the Augmented Reality online shopping system, ICIM2010, The 2010 International Conference on Information Management, Tainan, Taiwan, May 22.
11. Hsieh, M. C., Lin, H. C. K., Lin, J. W., & Chen, M. C. (2010). The establishment of an AR-based interactive digital artwork, GJCST, Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 10(5), 15-28.
12. Isman, A., & Celikli, G. E. (2009). How does student ability and self-efficacy affect the usage of computer technology? Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 8(1), 33-38.
13. Isman, A., & Isbulan, O. (2010). Usability level of distance education website (sakarya university sample). Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(1), 243-258.
14. Kato, H., Billinghurst, M., Blanding, B., & May, R. (1999). ARToolKit. Technical Report (Hiroshima City University), December.
15. Kirk, V., & Gopnik, A. (1990). High and low: Modern art and popular culture. New York: Museum of Modern Art.
16. Lin, H. C. K., & Li, F. (2008). Employing Max/MSP/Jitter and sobel operations to create digital art works based on the interaction among images, sounds, and MIDI music, JSTS, Journal of Scientific and Technological Studies, 42(2), 15-28.
17. Lin, H. C. K., & Li, F. (2009). The combination of information technologies and digital arts - from the interaction between images and sounds to the "empathy" status, Proc. of ITIA09, the 2009 Conference on Information Technology and Industrial Application, in Technology and Science Institute of Northern Taiwan, Beitou, Taipei, Taiwan, June 13.
18. Liu, E. Z. F. (2010). Early adolescents' perceptions of educational robots and learning of robotics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3), E44-E47.
19. Liu, E. Z. F., Kou, C. H., Lin, C. H., Cheng, S. S., & Chen, W. T. (2008). Developing multimedia instructional material for robotics education. WSEAS Transactions on Communications, 7(11), 1102-1111.
20. Liu, E. Z. F., & Lin, C. H. (2009). Developing evaluative indicators for educational computer games. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 174-178.
21. Liu, E. Z. F., & Lin, C. H. (2010). The survey study of mathematics motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MMSLQ) for grade 10-12 Taiwanese students. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(2), 221-233.
22. Manovich, L. (2001). The language of new media. Massachusetts: MIT Press
23. Milgram, P., & Kishino, F. (1994). A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE Trans. Information Systems, E77-D(12), 1321-1329.
24. Nielsen, J. (1994). Heuristic evaluation. In Nielsen, J. & Mack, R.L. (Eds.), Usability inspection methods. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
25. Nielsen, J., & Mark, R. L. (1994). Usability Inspection Methods. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
26. Nielsen, J., & Molich, R. (1990). Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces, Proceedings ACM CHI'90 Conf. (Seattle, WA, 1-5 April), 249-256.
27. Oliver, G. (2003). Virtual art. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
28. Sharp, H., Rogers, Y., & Sharp, H. (2008). Interaction design, beyond human-computer interaction (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
29. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basic of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures & techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30. Tullis, T. S., & Stetson, J. N. (2004). A comparison of questionnaires for assessing website usability. Usability Professional Association (UPA) 2004 Conference, Minneapolis, USA, June 7-11.
31. Webb, E. J., Campbell, D. T., Schwartz, R. D., & Sechrest, L. (1966). Unobtrusive measures: Nonreactive measures in the social sciences. Chicago: Rand McNally.
32. Zucker, S. D. (1997). The arts of interaction: interactivity, performativity and computers. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism (Special Issue on Art and Technology), 55(2), 17-127.