Assessment of the sensitizing potential of textile disperse dyes and some of their metabolites by the loose-Wt coculture-based sensitization assay (LCSA)

Archives of Toxicology

Volumn 86, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 733-740

  Sonnenburg, Anna ^a   Ahuja, Varun ^a,b   Schreiner, Maximilian ^c   Platzek, Thomas ^d   Stahlmann, Ralf ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^b LUPIN LIMITED   (India)

^c Bundeswehr Hospital   (Germany)

^d FEDERAL INSTITUTE FOR RISK ASSESSMENT   (Germany)

Author keywords

Disperse dyes; In vitro sensitization assay; LCSA; Sensitizing potential

Indexed keywords

2 (N ETHYLANILINO)ETHANOL; 2 AMINO 4 CRESOL; 2 AMINO 5 NITROTHIAZOLE; 4 AMINOACETANILIDE; 4 NITROANILINE; ACETANILIDE DERIVATIVE; ALCOHOL DERIVATIVE; ANILINE DERIVATIVE; DICLORAN; DISPERSE BLUE 1; DISPERSE BLUE 106; DISPERSE BLUE 124; DISPERSE ORANGE 3; DISPERSE ORANGE 37; DISPERSE RED 1; DISPERSE YELLOW 3; DYE; PHENYLENEDIAMINE; THIAZOLE DERIVATIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ALLERGY TEST; ARTICLE; ASSAY; CONTACT ALLERGY; DENDRITIC CELL; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; KERATINOCYTE; LOOSE FIT COCULTURE BASED SENSITIZATION ASSAY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIZATION;

ANIMALS; ANTHRAQUINONES; AZO COMPOUNDS; CELLS, CULTURED; COCULTURE TECHNIQUES; COLORING AGENTS; DENDRITIC CELLS; DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT; HUMANS; KERATINOCYTES; LOCAL LYMPH NODE ASSAY; MICE; TOXICITY TESTS;

EID: 84862894316     PISSN: 03405761     EISSN: 14320738     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00204-012-0811-9     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Aeby P, Ashikaga T, Bessou-Touya S, Schepky A, Gerberick F, Kern P, Marrec-Fairley M, Maxwell G, Ovigne JM, Sakaguchi H, Reisinger K, Tailhardat M, Martinozzi-Teissier S, Winkler P (2010) Identifying and characterizing chemical skin sensitizers without animal testing: Colipa's research and method development program. Toxicol In Vitro 24:1465-1473
2. Ahuja V, Schreiber C, Platzek T, Stahlmann R (2009a) Investigation of the sensitising and cross-sensitising potential of textile dyes and beta-lactam antibiotics using a biphasic mice local lymph node assay. Arch Toxicol 83:691-699
3. Ahuja V, Wanner R, Platzek T, Stahlmann R (2009b) Appraisal of the sensitising potential of orally and dermally administered mercaptobenzothiazole by a biphasic protocol of the local lymph node assay. Arch Toxicol 83:933-939
4. Ahuja V, Platzek T, Fink H, Sonnenburg A, Stahlmann R (2010) Study of the sensitising potential of various textile dyes using a biphasic murine local lymph node assay. Arch Toxicol 84:709-718
5. American Apparel & Footwear Association (2011) Restricted substances list (RSL). (Release 8), http://www.apparelandfootwear.org/Resources/ RestrictedSubstances.asp
6. Anderson SE, Siegel PD, Meade BJ (2011) The LLNA: a brief review of recent advances and limitations. J Allergy (Cairo) 2011: 424203
7. Basketter DA, Kan-King-Yu D, Dierkes P, Jowsey IR (2007) Does irritation potency contribute to the skin sensitization potency of contact allergens? Cutan Ocul Toxicol 26:279-286
8. Bordel-Gomez MT, Miranda-Romero A, Castrodeza-Sanz J (2010) Epidemiology of contact dermatitis: prevalence of sensitization to diVerent allergens and associated factors. Actas DermosiWliogr 101:59-75
9. Ehling G, Hecht M, Heusener A, Huesler J, Gamer AO, van Loveren H, Maurer T, Riecke K, Ulrich P, Vandebriel R, Vohr HW (2005a) An European inter-laboratory validation of alternative endpoints of the murine local lymph node assay: 2nd round. Toxicology 212:69-79
10. Ehling G, Hecht M, Heusener A, Huesler J, Gamer AO, van Loveren H, Maurer T, Riecke K, Ullmann L, Ulrich P, Vandebriel R, Vohr HW (2005b) An European inter-laboratory validation of alternative endpoints of the murine local lymph node assay: Wrst round. Toxicology 212:60-68
11. Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (2007) Introduction to the problems surrounding garment textiles. BfR Information (18), http://www.bfr.bund.de/cm/ 349/introduction-to-the-problems-surrounding-garment-textiles.pdf
12. Hatch KL (1984) Chemicals and textiles. Part I: dermatological problems related to Wbre content and dyes (review). Text Res J 54:664-682
13. Hatch KL, Motschi H, Maibach HI (2003) Disperse dyes in fabrics of patients patch-test-positive to disperse dyes. Am J Contact Dermat 14:205-212
14. Hausen BM (1993) Contact allergy to disperse blue 106 and blue 124 in black "velvet" clothes. Contact Dermat 28:169-173
15. Hausen BM, Menezes BF (1986) Disperse blue 106, a strong sensitizer. Contact Dermat 15:102-103
16. Hausen BM, Sawall EM (1989) Sensitization experiments with textile dyes in guinea pigs. Contact Dermat 20:27-31
17. Kojima H, Takeyoshi M, Sozu T, Awogi T, Arima K, Idehara K, Ikarashi Y, Kanazawa Y, Maki E, Omori T, Yuasa A, Yoshimura I (2011) Inter-laboratory validation of the modiWed murine local lymph node assay based on 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine incorporation. J Appl Toxicol 31:63-74
18. Marks JG Jr (1986) Occupational skin disease in hairdressers. Occup Med 1:273-284
19. McFadden JP, Basketter DA (2000) Contact allergy, irritancy and 'danger'. Contact Dermat 42:123-127
20. Omori T, Idehara K, Kojima H, Sozu T, Arima K, Goto H, Hanada T, Ikarashi Y, Inoda T, Kanazawa Y, Kosaka T, Maki E, Morimoto T, Shinoda S, Shinoda N, Takeyoshi M, Tanaka M, Uratani M, Usami M, Yamanaka A, Yoneda T, Yoshimura I, Yuasa A (2008) Interlaboratory validation of the modiWed murine local lymph node assay based on adenosine triphosphate measurement. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods 58:11-26
21. Python F, Goebel C, Aeby P (2007) Assessment of the U937 cell line for the detection of contact allergens. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 220:113-124
22. Sadhra S, Duhra P, Foulds IS (1989) Occupational dermatitis from Synacril Red 3b liquid (CI Basic Red 22). Contact Dermat 21: 316-320
23. Sailstad DM (2002) Murine local lymph node assay: an alternative test method for skin hypersensitivity testing. Lab Anim (NY) 31:36-41
24. Sakaguchi H, Ashikaga T, Miyazawa M, Yoshida Y, Ito Y, Yoneyama K, Hirota M, Itagaki H, Toyoda H, Suzuki H (2006) Development of an in vitro skin sensitization test using human cell lines; human Cell Line Activation Test (h-CLAT). II. An inter-laboratory study of the h-CLAT. Toxicol In Vitro 20:774-784
25. Schreiner M, Peiser M, Briechle D, Stahlmann R, Zuberbier T, Wanner R (2007) A loose-Wt coculture of activated keratinocytes and dendritic cell-related cells for prediction of sensitizing potential. Allergy 62:1419-1428
26. Schreiner M, Peiser M, Briechle D, Stahlmann R, Zuberbier T, Wanner R (2008) A new dendritic cell type suitable as sentinel of contact allergens. Toxicology 249:146-152
27. Seidenari S, Giusti F, Massone F, Mantovani L (2002) Sensitization to disperse dyes in a patch test population over a Wve-year period. Am J Contact Dermat 13:101-107
28. Stahlmann R, Wegner M, Riecke K, Kruse M, Platzek T (2006) Sensitising potential of four textile dyes and some of their metabolites in a modiWed local lymph node assay. Toxicology 219:113-123
29. Suda A, Yamashita M, Tabei M, Taguchi K, Vohr HW, Tsutsui N, Suzuki R, Kikuchi K, Sakaguchi K, Mochizuki K, Nakamura K (2002) Local lymph node assay with non-radioisotope alternative endpoints. J Toxicol Sci 27:205-218
30. Ulrich P, Streich J, Suter W (2001) Intralaboratory validation of alternative endpoints in the murine local lymph node assay for the identiWcation of contact allergic potential: primary ear skin irritation and ear-draining lymph node hyperplasia induced by topical chemicals. Arch Toxicol 74:733-744
31. Wanner R, Sonnenburg A, Quatchadze M, Schreiner M, Peiser M, Zuberbier T, Stahlmann R (2010) ClassiWcation of sensitizing and irritative potential in a combined in vitro assay. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 245:211-218