Licensing-in fosters rapid invention! the effect of the grant-back clause and technological unfamiliarity

Strategic Management Journal

Volumn 33, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 965-985

  Leone, Maria Isabella ^a   Reichstein, Toke ^b  

^a LUMSA UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^b Department of International Economics and Management   (Denmark)

Author keywords

grant back; incentives; invention speed; technological unfamiliarity; technology in licensing

Indexed keywords

DATA SETS; GRANT-BACK; INCENTIVES; INNOVATION MANAGEMENT; TECHNOLOGICAL UNFAMILIARITY;

PATENTS AND INVENTIONS;

COPYRIGHTS;

EID: 84862882395     PISSN: 01432095     EISSN: 10970266     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/smj.1950     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Agarwal R, Croson R, Mahoney JT,. 2010. The role of incentives and communication in strategic alliances: an experimental investigation. Strategic Management Journal 31 (4): 413-437.
2. Aghion P, Tirole J,. 1994. The management of innovation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 109 (4): 1185-1209.
3. Ahuja G,. 2000. Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: a longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly 45 (3): 425-455.
4. Ahuja G, Lampert CM,. 2001. Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: a longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management Journal, June-July Special Issue 22: 521-543.
5. Anand BN, Khanna T,. 2000. The structure of licensing contracts. Journal of Industrial Economics 48 (1): 103-135.
6. Arora A,. 1996. Contracting for tacit knowledge: the provision of technical services in technology licensing contracts. Journal of Development Economics 50 (2): 233-256.
7. Arora A, Ceccagnoli M,. 2006. Patent protection, complementary assets, and firms' incentives for technology licensing. Management Science 52 (2): 293-308.
8. Arora A, Fosfuri A,. 2003. Licensing the markets for technology. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 52 (2): 272-295.
9. Arora A, Fosfuri A, Gambardella A,. 2001. Markets for Technology: The Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
10. Arora A, Gambardella A,. 1990. Complementarity and external linkages: the strategies of the large firms in biotechnology. Journal of Industrial Economics 38 (4): 361-379.
11. Arora A, Gambardella A,. 2010. Ideas for rent: an overview of markets for technology. Industrial and Corporate Change 19 (3): 775-803.
12. Arundel A, Kabla I,. 1998. What percentage of innovations are patented? Empirical estimates for European firms. Research Policy 27 (2): 127-141.
13. Atuahene-Gima K,. 1993. Determinants of inward technology licensing intentions: an empirical analysis of Australian engineering firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management 10: 230-240.
14. Bennett S,. 1983. Log-logistic regression models for survival data. Applied Statistics 32 (2): 165-171.
15. Cassiman B, Veugelers R,. 2006. In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition. Management Science 51 (1): 68-82.
16. Caves R, Crookell H, Killing P,. 1983. The imperfect market for technology licenses. Oxford Bulletin of Economics & Statistics 45 (3): 249-267.
17. Ceccagnoli M, Graham S, Higgings M, Lee J,. 2010. Productivity and the role of complementary assets in firms' demand for technology innovations. Industrial and Corporate Change 19 (3): 839-869.
18. Cesaroni F,. 2004. Technological outsourcing and product diversification: do markets for technology affect firms' strategies? Research Policy 33 (10): 1547-1564.
19. Chatterji D,. 1996. Accessing external sources of technology. Research Technology Management 39 (2): 569-596.
20. Cheshire D,. 2007. Slow innovation: a savour-y way to success. Change This 40 (6): 1-9.
21. Choi JP,. 2002. A dynamic analysis of licensing: the 'boomerang' effect and grant-back clauses. International Economic Review 43 (3): 803-829.
22. Cohen WM, Levinthal DA,. 1989. Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D. Economic Journal 99 (397): 569-596.
23. Cohen WM, Nelson RR, Walsh J,. 1998. Protecting their intellectual assets: appropriability conditions and why U.S. manufacturing firms patent (or not). NBER Working paper no. 7552. National Bureau of Economic Research: Cambridge, MA.
24. David PA, Olsen TE,. 1992. Technology adoption, learning spillovers, and the optimal duration of patent-based monopolies. International Journal of Industrial Organization 10 (4): 517-543.
25. Davies H,. 1977. Technology transfer through commercial transactions. Journal of Industrial Economics 26 (2): 161-175.
26. Dehejia RH, Wahba S,. 2002. Propensity score-matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies. Review of Economics and Statistics 84 (1): 151-161.
27. Eisenhardt KM, Martin JA,. 2000. Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic Management Journal, October-November Special Issue 21: 1105-1121.
28. Fleming L, Sorenson O,. 2001. Technology as a complex adaptive system: evidence from patent data. Research Policy 30 (7): 1019-1039.
29. Fleming L, Sorenson O,. 2004. Science as a map in technological search. Strategic Management Journal, August-September Special Issue 25: 909-928.
30. Fosfuri A,. 2006. The licensing dilemma: understanding the determinants of the rate of technology licensing. Strategic Management Journal 27 (12): 1141-1158.
31. Gallini NT, Winter RA,. 1985. Licensing in the theory of innovation. RAND Journal of Economics 16 (2): 237-252.
32. Gans JS, Hsu DH, Stern S,. 2008. The impact of uncertain intellectual property rights on the market for ideas: evidence from patent grant delays. Management Science 54 (5): 982-997.
33. Gomory RE,. 1989. From the ladder of science to the product development cycle. Harvard Business Review 67 (6): 99-105.
34. Grossman SJ, Hart OD,. 1986. The cost and benefits of ownership: a theory of vertical and lateral integration. Journal of Political Economy 94 (4): 691-719.
35. Gutierrez RG,. 2002. Parametric frailty and shared frailty survival models. STATA Journal 2 (1): 22-44.
36. Hagedoorn J,. 1993. Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: interorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences. Strategic Management Journal 14 (5): 371-385.
37. Hall B, Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M,. 2001. The NBER patent citations data file: lessons, insights, and methodological tools. NBER Working paper no. 8498. National Bureau of Economic Research: Cambridge, MA.
38. Hall BH, Ziedonis RH,. 2001. The patent paradox revisited: an empirical study of patenting in the U.S. semiconductor industry. RAND Journal of Economics 32 (1): 101-128.
39. Hamel G,. 1991. Competition for competence and inter-partner learning within international strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, Summer Special Issue 12: 83-103.
40. Hart O, Moore J,. 2008. Contracts as reference points. Quarterly Journal of Economics 123 (1): 1-48.
41. Heckman JJ,. 1979. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47 (1): 153-161.
42. Heckman JJ, Ichimura H, Todd P,. 1997. Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: evidence from evaluating a job training program. Review of Economic Studies 64 (4): 605-654.
43. Henderson R, Cockburn I,. 1994. Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management Journal, Winter Special Issue 15: 63-84.
44. IBM. 2005. IBM announces new licensing program to prompt collaborative innovation with VCs & startups. IBM. Available at: (April 2010).
45. IBM. 2010. Technology. IBM. Available at:. (April 2010).
46. Johnson D,. 2002. 'Learning-by-licensing': R&D and technology licensing in Brazilian invention. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 11 (3): 163-177.
47. Katila R, Ahuja G,. 2002. Something old, something new: a longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal 45 (8): 1183-1194.
48. Kessler EH, Bierly PE,. 2002. Is faster really better? An empirical test of the implications of innovation speed. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 49 (1): 2-12.
49. Kessler EH, Chakrabarti AK,. 1996. Innovation speed: a conceptual model of context, antecedents, and outcomes. Academy of Management Review 21 (4): 1143-1193.
50. Kim YJ, Vonortas NS,. 2006. Technology licensing partners. Journal of Economics and Business 58 (4): 273-289.
51. Lane PJ, Lubatkin M,. 1998. Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal 19 (5): 461-477.
52. Lanjouw JO, Schankerman M,. 1999. The quality of ideas: measuring innovation with multiple indicators. NBER Working paper no. 7345.National Bureau of Economic Research: Cambridge, MA.
53. Laursen K, Leone MI, Torrisi S,. 2010. Technological exploration through licensing: new insights from the licensee's point of view. Industrial and Corporate Change 19 (3): 871-897.
54. Laursen K, Salter AJ,. 2006. Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovative performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal 27 (2): 131-150.
55. Leiponen A,. 2008. Control of intellectual assets in client relationships: implications for innovation. Strategic Management Journal 29 (13): 1371-1394.
56. Levin RC, Klevorick AK, Nelson RR, Winter SG,. 1987. Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 3: 783-831.
57. Lin B-W,. 2003. Technology transfer as technological learning: a source of competitive advantage for firms with limited R&D sources. R&D Management 33 (3): 327-341.
58. Lowe J, Taylor P,. 1998. R&D and technology purchase through license agreements: complementary strategies and complementary assets. R&D Management 28 (4): 263-278.
59. March J,. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science 2 (1): 71-87.
60. Markman GD, Gianiodis PT, Phan PH, Balkin DB,. 2005. Innovation speed: transferring university technology to market. Research Policy 34 (7): 1058-1075.
61. Merges RP, Nelson RR,. 1990. On the complex economics of patent scope. Columbia Law Review 90 (4): 839-916.
62. Microsoft. 2008. Open innovation: the evolution of the Microsoft approach to intellectual property. Microsoft Announcements 2008 (August): 1-15.
63. Miller D, Chen M-J,. 1996. The simplicity of competitive repertoires: an empirical analysis. Strategic Management Journal 17 (6): 419-439.
64. Mowery DC, Oxley JE, Silverman BS,. 1996. Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfers. Strategic Management Journal, Winter Special Issue 17: 77-91.
65. Nerkar A, Roberts PW,. 2004. Technological and product-market experience and the success of new product introductions in the pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management Journal, August-September Special Issue 25: 779-799.
66. Norling P,. 2009. In innovation, is patience a virtue? Research-Technology Management 52 (3): 18-23.
67. Prahalad CK, Hamel G,. 1990. The core competence of the corporation. Havard Business Review 68 (3): 79-91.
68. Rigby D, Zook C,. 2002. Open market innovation. Harvard Business Review 80: 80-89.
69. Roberts EB, Berry CA,. 1984. Entering new businesses: selecting strategies for success. Working paper 1492-3-84 Sloan School of Management, MIT: Cambridge, MA.
70. Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB,. 1983. The central role of propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70 (1): 41-55.
71. Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB,. 1984. Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score. Journal of American Statistical Association 79 (387): 516-524.
72. Shapiro C,. 1985. Patent licensing and R&D rivalry. American Economic Review 75 (2): 25-30.
73. Silverman BS,. 1999. Technological resources and the direction of corporate diversification: toward an integration of the resource-based view and transaction cost economics. Management Science 45 (8): 1109-1124.
74. Smith GV, Parr RL,. 2005. Intellectual Property: Valuation, Exploitation, and Infringement Damages. Wiley: Hoboken, NJ.
75. Teece DT, Pisano G,. 1994. The dynamic capabilities of firms: an introduction. Industrial and Corporate Change 3 (3): 537-555.
76. Van Dijk T,. 2000. License contracts, future exchange clauses and technological competition. European Economic Review 44 (8): 1431-1448.
77. Wooldridge JM,. 2002. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
78. Yet2.com. 2008. Licensing and intellectual property tips. Yet2.com. Available at: (April 2010).
79. Ziedonis RH,. 2004. Don't fence me in: fragmented markets for technology and the patent acquisition strategies of firms. Management Science 50 (6): 804-820.