Acceptance of health information technology in health professionals: An application of the revised technology acceptance model

Health Informatics Journal

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 124-134

  Ketikidis, Panayiotis ^a   Dimitrovski, Tomislav ^a   Lazuras, Lambros ^a   Bath, Peter A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (Greece)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

E health; Electronic health records; Healthcare policy; IT healthcare evaluation; Organisational change and IT

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANXIETY; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER INTERFACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MACEDONIA (REPUBLIC); MALE; MASS COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MIDDLE AGED; NURSE; PHYSICIAN; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF CONCEPT; STATISTICS; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ADULT; ANXIETY; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MACEDONIA (REPUBLIC); MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATICS APPLICATIONS; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, THEORETICAL; NURSES; PHYSICIANS; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SELF EFFICACY; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84862844132     PISSN: 14604582     EISSN: 17412811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1460458211435425     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Berg M. Implementing information systems in the health care organizations: myths and challenges. Int J Med Inform. 2001 ; 64: 143-156 (Pubitemid 33089342)
2. Holden RJ, Karsh B. The technology acceptance model: its past and its future in healthcare. J Biomed Inform. 2010 ; 43: 159-189
3. Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly. 1989 ; 13: 319-339
4. Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Sci. 2000 ; 46: 186-204 (Pubitemid 30594361)
5. Koufaris M. Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online consumer behaviour. Inf Systems Res. 2002 ; 13: 205-223
6. Pavlou PA. Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: integrating trust and risk wit the technology acceptance model. Int J Electronic Commerce. 2003 ; 7: 69-103
7. Lee Y, Kozar KA, Larsen KRT. The technology acceptance model: past, present, and future. CAIS. 2003 ; 12: 752-780
8. Turner M, Kitchenham B, Brereton P, Charters S, Bugden D. Does the technology acceptance model predict actual use? A systematic literature review. Inform Software Technol. 2010 ; 52: 463-479
9. Venkatesh V, Balla H. Technology acceptance 3 and a research agenda for interventions. Decision Sci. 2008 ; 39: 273-315
10. Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Sci. 1989 ; 35: 982-1003
11. Fishbein M, Ajzen I Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley ; 1975:
12. Armitage CJ, Conner M. Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: a meta-analytic review. Brit J Soc Psychol. 2001 ; 40: 471-499 (Pubitemid 33597358)
13. Bagozzi RP. The legacy of the technology acceptance model and a proposal for a paradigm shift. J Assoc Inform Systems. 2007 ; 8: 244-254
14. Ajzen I, Fishbein M European review of social psychology. Stroebe W Hewstone M, ed. Chichester: Wiley & Sons ; 2000:
15. Ajzen I. Residual effects of past on later behaviour: habituation and reasoned action perspectives. Personality Soc Psychol Rev. 2002 ; 6: 107-122 (Pubitemid 37195266)
16. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behaviour. Organ Beh Human Decision Proc. 1991 ; 50: 179-211
17. King WR, He J. A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Inform Manage. 2006 ; 43: 740-755 (Pubitemid 44287241)
18. Ma Q, Liu L. The technology acceptance model: a meta-analysis of empirical findings. J Organizational End User Computing. 2004 ; 16: 59-72
19. Legris P, Ingham J, Collerette P. Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Inform Manage. 2003 ; 40: 191-204 (Pubitemid 35412508)
20. Schepers J, Wetzels M. A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: investigating subjective norm and moderation effects. Inform Manage. 2007 ; 44: 90-103 (Pubitemid 46028956)
21. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly. 2003 ; 27: 425-478
22. Berg M Cambridge, MA: MIT Press ; 1997:
23. Van Schaik P, Bettany-Saltikov JAB, Warren JG. Clinical acceptance of a low-cost portable system for postural assessment. Behav Inf Technol. 2002 ; 21: 47-57 (Pubitemid 34658586)
24. Chau PYK, Hu PJH. Information technology acceptance by individual professionals: a model comparison approach. Decision Sci. 2001 ; 32: 699-719
25. Yi MY, Jackson JD, Park JS, Probst JC. Understanding information technology acceptance by individual professionals: toward an integrative view. Inform Manage. 2006 ; 43: 350-363 (Pubitemid 43333006)
26. Perugini M, Bagozzi RP. The role of desires and anticipated emotions in goal-directed behaviours: broadening and deepening he theory of planned behaviour. Brit J Soc Psychol. 2001 ; 40: 79-98 (Pubitemid 33654043)
27. Rivis A, Sheeran P. Descriptive norms as an additional predictor in the theory of planned behaviour: a meta-analysis. Curr Psychol. 2003 ; 22: 218-233 (Pubitemid 38860587)
28. Hambleton R K. The next generation of the ITC test translation and adaptation guidelines. Eur J Psychol Assess. 2001 ; 17: 164-172
29. Teo T, Lee CB, Chai CS. Understanding pre-service teachers' computer attitudes: applying and extending the technology acceptance model. J Comp Assist Learn. 2008 ; 24: 128-143
30. Cohen J. A power primer. Psychological Bulletin. 1992 ; 112: 155-159
31. Cialdini RB. Crafting normative messages to protect the environment. Cur Dir Psychol Sci. 2003 ; 12: 105-109 (Pubitemid 37089301)
32. Conner M, Armitage CJ. Extending the theory of planned behavior: a review and avenues for further research. J Appl Soc Psychol. 1998 ; 28: 1429-1464