Isoelectric point optimization using peptide descriptors and support vector machines

Journal of Proteomics

Volumn 75, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 2269-2274

  Perez Riverol, Yasset ^a,d   Audain, Enrique ^b   Millan, Aleli ^a   Ramos, Yassel ^a   Sanchez, Aniel ^a   Vizcaíno, Juan Antonio ^d   Wang, Rui ^d   Müller, Markus ^c   Machado, Yoan J ^b   Betancourt, Lazaro H ^a   González, Luis J ^a   Padrón, Gabriel ^a   Besada, Vladimir ^a  

^a CENTER FOR GENETIC ENGINEERING AND BIOTECHNOLOGY   (Cuba)

^b CENTER OF MOLECULAR IMMUNOLOGY   (Cuba)

^c SWISS INSTITUTE OF BIOINFORMATICS   (Switzerland)

^d WELLCOME TRUST SANGER INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Isoelectric point; Peptide descriptors; Support vector machine

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; PEPTIDE;

ARTICLE; ISOELECTRIC POINT; PH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE;

ISOELECTRIC POINT; MODELS, CHEMICAL; PEPTIDES; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

EID: 84862798576     PISSN: 18743919     EISSN: 18767737     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2012.01.029     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bjellqvist B., Hughes G.J., Pasquali C., Paquet N., Ravier F., Sanchez J.C., et al. The focusing positions of polypeptides in immobilized pH gradients can be predicted from their amino acid sequences. Electrophoresis 1993, 14:1023-1031.
2. Cargile B.J., Sevinsky J.R., Essader A.S., Eu J.P., Stephenson J.L. Calculation of the isoelectric point of tryptic peptides in the pH 3.5-4.5 range based on adjacent amino acid effects. Electrophoresis 2008, 29:2768-2778.
3. Vapnik V. The nature of statistical learning theory 1995, Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.
4. Kawashima S., Pokarowski P., Pokarowska M., Kolinski A., Katayama T., Kanehisa M. AAindex: amino acid index database, progress report 2008. Nucleic Acids Res 2008, 36:D202-D205.
5. Righetti P.G. Determination of the isoelectric point of proteins by capillary isoelectric focusing. J Chromatogr A 2004, 1037:491-499.
6. Gauci S., van Breukelen B., Lemeer S.M., Krijgsveld J., Heck A.J. A versatile peptide pI calculator for phosphorylated and N-terminal acetylated peptides experimentally tested using peptide isoelectric focusing. Proteomics 2008, 8:4898-4906.
7. Heller M., Ye M., Michel P.E., Morier P., Stalder D., Junger M.A., et al. Added value for tandem mass spectrometry shotgun proteomics data validation through isoelectric focusing of peptides. J Proteome Res 2005, 4:2273-2282.
8. Perez-Riverol Y., Sanchez A., Ramos Y., Schmidt A., Muller M., Betancourt L., et al. In silico analysis of accurate proteomics, complemented by selective isolation of peptides. J Proteomics 2011, 74:2071-2082.
9. Gasteiger E., Gattiker A., Hoogland C., Ivanyi I., Appel R.D., Bairoch A. ExPASy: the proteomics server for in-depth protein knowledge and analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 2003, 31:3784-3788.
10. Liu H.X., Zhang R.S., Yao X.J., Liu M.C., Hu Z.D., Fan B.T. Prediction of the isoelectric point of an amino acid based on GA-PLS and SVMs. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 2004, 44:161-167.
11. Tian F., Yang L., Lv F., Zhou P. Predicting liquid chromatographic retention times of peptides from the Drosophila melanogaster proteome by machine learning approaches. Anal Chim Acta 2009, 644:10-16.
12. Supek F., Peharec P., Krsnik-Rasol M., Smuc T. Enhanced analytical power of SDS-PAGE using machine learning algorithms. Proteomics 2008, 8:28-31.
13. Lo S.L., Cai C.Z., Chen Y.Z., Chung M.C. Effect of training datasets on support vector machine prediction of protein-protein interactions. Proteomics 2005, 5:876-884.
14. Burges C.J.C. A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition. Data Min Knowl Discov 1998, 2:121-167.
15. Craig R., Beavis R.C. TANDEM: matching proteins with tandem mass spectra. Bioinformatics 2004, 20:1466-1467.
16. Keller A., Nesvizhskii A.I., Kolker E., Aebersold R. Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search. Anal Chem 2002, 74:5383-5392.
17. Kuhn M. Building predictive models in R using the caret package. J Stat Softw 2008, 28:1-26.
18. Karatzoglou A., Feinerer I. Kernel-based machine learning for fast text mining in {R}. Comput Stat Data Anal 2009.
19. Zimmerman J.M., Eliezer N., Simha R. The characterization of amino acid sequences in proteins by statistical methods. J Theor Biol 1968, 21:170-201.
20. Yang D., Ramkissoon K., Hamlett E., Giddings M.C. High-accuracy peptide mass fingerprinting using peak intensity data with machine learning. J Proteome Res 2008, 7:62-69.
21. Timm W., Scherbart A., Bocker S., Kohlbacher O., Nattkemper T.W. Peak intensity prediction in MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry: a machine learning study to support quantitative proteomics. BMC Bioinformatics 2008, 9:443.
22. Larranaga P., Calvo B., Santana R., Bielza C., Galdiano J., Inza I., et al. Machine learning in bioinformatics. Brief Bioinform 2006, 7:86-112.
23. Barla A., Jurman G., Riccadonna S., Merler S., Chierici M., Furlanello C. Machine learning methods for predictive proteomics. Brief Bioinform 2008, 9:119-128.
24. Horth P., Miller C.A., Preckel T., Wenz C. Efficient fractionation and improved protein identification by peptide OFFGEL electrophoresis. Mol Cell Proteomics 2006, 5:1968-1974.
25. Cargile B.J., Talley D.L., Stephenson J.L. Immobilized pH gradients as a first dimension in shotgun proteomics and analysis of the accuracy of pI predictability of peptides. Electrophoresis 2004, 25:936-945.
26. Cargile B.J., Stephenson J.L. An alternative to tandem mass spectrometry: isoelectric point and accurate mass for the identification of peptides. Anal Chem 2004, 76:267-275.