A new essential protein discovery method based on the integration of protein-protein interaction and gene expression data

BMC Systems Biology

Volumn 6, Issue , 2012, Pages

  Li, Min ^a,b   Zhang, Hanhui ^a   Wang, Jian xin ^a   Pan, Yi ^a,b  

^a CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; ESSENTIAL GENE; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENETICS; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; METHODOLOGY; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEOMICS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENES, ESSENTIAL; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; PROTEINS; PROTEOMICS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 84862787765     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17520509     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1752-0509-6-15     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Acencio ML, Lemke N. Towards the prediction of essential genes by integration of network topology, cellular localization and biological process information. BMC Bioinforma 2009, 10:290-307.
2. Furney SJ, Albà M, Lóez-Bigas N. Differences in the evolutionary history of disease genes affected by dominant or recessive mutations. BMC Genomics 2006, 7:165. 10.1186/1471-2164-7-165, 1534034, 16817963.
3. Kondrashov FA, Ogurtsov AY, Kondrashov AS. Bioinformatical assay of human gene morbidity. Nucl Acids Res 2004, 32(5):1731-1737. 10.1093/nar/gkh330, 390328, 15020709.
4. Steinmetz LM, Scharfe C, Deutschbauer AM, Mokranjac D, Herman ZS, et al. Systematic screen for human disease genes in yeast. Nature Gene 2002, 31:400-404.
5. Lamichhane G, Zignol M, Blades NJ, Geiman DE, Dougherty A, Grosset J, Broman KW, Bishai WR. A postgenomic method for predicting essential genes at subsaturation levels of mutagenesis: application to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. PNAS 2003, 100(12):7213-7218. 10.1073/pnas.1231432100, 165855, 12775759.
6. Becker SA, Palsson BO. Genome-scale reconstruction of the metabolic network in Staphylococcus aureus N315: an initial draft to the two-dimensional annotation. BMC Microbiol 2005, 5:8. 10.1186/1471-2180-5-8, 1079855, 15752426.
7. Winzeler FA, Shoemaker DD, Astromoff A, Liang H, Anderson K, et al. Functional characterization of the S. cerevisiae genome by gene deletion and parallel analysis. Science 1999, 285:901-906. 10.1126/science.285.5429.901, 10436161.
8. Kamath RS, Fraser AG, Dong Y, Poulin G, Durbin R, et al. Systematic functional analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome using RNAi. Nature 2003, 421:231-237. 10.1038/nature01278, 12529635.
9. Giaever G, Chu AM, Ni L, et al. Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature 2002, 418(6896):387-391. 10.1038/nature00935, 12140549.
10. Cullen LM, Arndt GM. Genome-wide screening for gene function using RNAi in mammalian cells. Immunol Cell Biol 2005, 83(3):217-223. 10.1111/j.1440-1711.2005.01332.x, 15877598.
11. Roemer T, Jiang B, Davison J, et al. Large-scale essential gene identification in Candida albicans and applications to antifungal drug discovery. Mol Microbiol 2003, 50:167-181. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03697.x, 14507372.
12. Yu H, Greenbaum D, Lu HX, Zhu X, Gerstein M. Genomic analysis of essentiality within protein networks. Trends Genet 2004, 20(6):227-231. 10.1016/j.tig.2004.04.008, 15145574.
13. Hahn MW, Kern AD. Comparative Genomics of Centrality and Essentiality in Three Eukaryotic Protein Interaction Networks. Mol Biol Evol 2004, 22(4):803-806.
14. Jeong H, Mason SP, et al. Lethality and centrality in protein networks. Nature 2001, 411(6833):41-42. 10.1038/35075138, 11333967.
15. Yu H, Braun P, Yildirim MA, et al. High-Quality Binary Protein Interaction Map of the Yeast Interactome Network. Science 2008, 322(5898):104-110. 10.1126/science.1158684, 2746753, 18719252.
16. He X, Zhang J. Why Do Hubs Tend to Be Essential in Protein Networks?. PLoS Genet 2006, 2(6):0826-0834.
17. Zotenko E, Mestre J, O'Leary DP, Przytycka TM. Why Do Hubs in the Yeast Protein Interaction Network Tend To Be Essential: Reexamining the Connection between the Network Topology and Essentiality. PLoS Comput Biol 2008, 4(8):1-16.
18. Ning K, Ng HK, Srihari S, et al. Examination of the relationship between essential genes in PPI network and hub proteins in reverse nearest neighbor topology. BMC Bioinforma 2010, 11:505.
19. Batada NN, Hurst LD, Tyers M. Evolutionary and physiological importance of hub proteins. PLoS Comput Biol 2006, 2(7):e88. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020088, 1500817, 16839197.
20. Vallabhajosyula R, Chakravarti D, Lutfeali S, Ray A, Raval A. Identifying Hubs in Protein Interaction Networks. PLoS One 2009, 4(4):1-10.
21. Estrada E. Virtual identification of essential proteins within the protein interaction network of yeast. Proteomics 2006, 6(1):35-40. 10.1002/pmic.200500209, 16281187.
22. Joy M, et al. High-betweenness proteins in the yeast protein interaction network. J Biomed Biotechnol 2005, 2:96-103.
23. Wuchty S, Stadler PF. Centers of complex networks. J Theor Biol 2003, 223:45-53. 10.1016/S0022-5193(03)00071-7, 12782116.
24. Lin CY, Chin CH, Wu HH, Chen SH, Ho CW, Ko MT. Hubba: hub objects analyzer-a framework of interactome hubs identification for network biology. Nucleic Acids Res 2008, 36:438-443.
25. Li M, Wang J, Chen X, Wang H, Pan Y. A local average connectivity-based method for identifying essential proteins from the network level. Comput Biol Chem 2011, 35:143-150. 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2011.04.002, 21704260.
26. Park K, Kim D. Localized network centrality and essentiality in the yeast-protein interaction network Proteomics 2009, 9:5143-5154.
27. Wang H, Li M, Wang J, Pan Y. A New Method for Identifying Essential Proteins Based on Edge Clustering Coefficient. ISBRA 2011, LNBI 2010, 6674:87-98.
28. Li M, Wang J, Wang H, Pan Y. Essential Proteins Discovery from Weighted Protein Interaction Networks. ISBRA2010, LNBI 2010, 6053:89-100.
29. Ercsey-Ravasz M, Lichtenwalter R, Chawla NV, Toroczkai Z. Range-limited centrality measures in complex networks. , http://arxiv.org/abs/1111.5382
30. Korn A, Schubert A, Telcs A. Lobby index in networks. Physica A 2009, 388:2221-2226.
31. Lu L, Zhang YC, Yeung CH, Zhou T. Leaders in Social Networks, the Delicious Case. PLoS One 2011, 6:e21202. 10.1371/journal.pone.0021202, 3124485, 21738620.
32. Gosh R, Lerman K. A Parameterized Centrality Metrics for Network Analysis. Phys Rev 2011, E 83:066118.
33. Kovács IA, Palotai R, Szalay MS, Csermely P. Community landscapes: an integrative approach to determine overlapping network module hierarchy, identify key nodes and predict network dynamics. PLoS One 2010, 5:e12528. 10.1371/journal.pone.0012528, 2932713, 20824084.
34. Ren J, Wang J, Li L, Wang H, Liu B. Prediction of essential proteins by integration of PPI network topology andprotein complexes information. ISBRA 2011, LNBI 2010, 6674:12-24.
35. Estrada E, Rodríuez-Veláquez JA. Subgraph centrality in complex networks. Physical Review E 2005, 71(5):1-9.
36. Bonacich P. Power and centrality: A family of measures. Am J Sociol 1987, 92(5):1170-1182.
37. Stephenson K, Zelen M. Rethinking centrality: Methods and examples. Social Networks 1989, 11:1-37.
38. Pržulj N, Wigle DA, Jurisica I. Functional topology in a network of protein interactions. Bioinformatics 2004, 20(3):340-348. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg415, 14960460.
39. Yu H, Kim PM, Sprecher E, Trifonov V, Gerstein M. The importance of bottlenecks in protein networks: Correlation with gene essentiality and expression dynamics. PLoS Comput Biol 2007, 3(4):e59. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030059, 1853125, 17447836.
40. Friedel C, Zimmer R. Inferring topology from clustering coefficients in protein-protein interaction networks. BMC Bioinforma 2006, 7:519.
41. Radicchi F, Castellano C, Cecconi F, Loreto V, Parisi D. Defining and identifying communities in networks. PNAS 2004, 101:2658-2663. 10.1073/pnas.0400054101, 365677, 14981240.
42. Li M, Wang J, Chen J. A Fast Agglomerate Algorithm for Mining Functional Modules in Protein Interaction Networks. BMEI 2008 2008, 1:3-7. IEEE press.
43. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pearson%27s_correlation_coefficient
44. Gavin AC, et al. Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes. Nature 2002, 415(6868):123-124. 10.1038/415123a, 11805813.
45. Hart GT, Lee I, Marcotte EM. A high-accuracy consensus map of yeast protein complexes reveals modular nature of gene essentiality. BMC Bioinforma 2007, 8:236.
46. Xenarios I, Rice DW, Salwinski L, Baron MK, Marcotte EM, Eisenberg D. DIP: the database of interacting proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 2000, 28(1):289-291. 10.1093/nar/28.1.289, 102387, 10592249.
47. Mewes HW, et al. MIPS: analysis and annotation of proteins from whole genomes in 2005. Nucleic Acids Res 2006, 34:D169-D172. 10.1093/nar/gkj148, 1347510, 16381839.
48. Cherry JM, et al. SGD: Saccharomyces Genome Database. Nucleic Acids Res 1988, 26(1):73-79.
49. Zhang R, Lin Y. DEG 5.0, a database of essential genes in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 2009, 37(1):D455-D458. 2686491, 18974178.
50. Saccharomyces Genome Deletion Project. , http://www-sequence.stanford.edu/group/
51. Tu BP, Kudlicki A, Rowicka M, McKnight SL. Logic of the yeast metabolic cycle: temporal compartmentalization of cellular processes. Science 2005, 310:1152-1158. 10.1126/science.1120499, 16254148.
52. Holman AG, Davis P, Foster JM, et al. Computational prediction of essential genes in an unculturable endosymbiotic bacterium. Wolbachia of Brugia malayi BMC Microbiology 2009, 9:243.