Supplier selection problem revisited from the perspective of product configuration

International Journal of Production Research

Volumn 50, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 2864-2876

  Kim, Duck Young ^a   Wagner, Stephan M ^b  

^a Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology   (South Korea)

^b ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

multiple criteria decision analysis; product configuration; supplier configuration; supplier selection; supply chain management

Indexed keywords

DECISION MODELS; MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS; PRODUCT CONFIGURATION; SELECTION PROCESS; SUPPLIER CONFIGURATION; SUPPLIER SELECTION; SUPPLIER-SUPPLIER RELATIONSHIPS;

MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PRODUCTION ENGINEERING;

SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84862657984     PISSN: 00207543     EISSN: 1366588X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2011.561372     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Adler, N, Friedman, L, and, Sinuany-Stern, Z. 2002. Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context. European Journal of Operational Research, 140 (2): 249-265. (Pubitemid 34435032)
2. Andersen, P, and, Petersen, NC. 1993. A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 39 (10): 1261-1264.
3. Balakrishnan, N, and, Chakravarty, AK. 2008. Product design with multiple suppliers for component variants. International Journal of Production Economics, 112 (2): 723-741. (Pubitemid 351289067)
4. Bhutta, KS, and, Huq, F. 2002. Supplier selection problem: a comparison of the total cost of ownership and analytic hierarchy process approaches. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 7 (3): 126-135. (Pubitemid 38947721)
5. Bouyssou, D. 1999. Using DEA as a tool for MCDM: some remarks. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 50 (9): 974-978.
6. Castelli, L, Pesenti, R, and, Ukovich, W. 2001. DEA-like models for efficiency evaluations of specialized and interdependent units. European Journal of Operational Research, 132 (2): 274-286. (Pubitemid 32385020)
7. Charnes, A, Cooper, WW, and, Rhodes, E. 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2 (6): 429-444. (Pubitemid 9402758)
8. Choi, TY. 2002. Supplier-supplier relationships and their implications for buyer-supplier relationships. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 49 (2): 119-130. (Pubitemid 34798799)
9. De Boer, L, Labro, E, and, Morlacchi, P. 2001. A review of methods supporting supplier selection. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 7 (2): 75-89. (Pubitemid 33632140)
10. De Boer, L, Van der Wegen, L, and, Telgen, J. 1998. Outranking methods in support of supplier selection. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 4 (2-3): 109-118. (Pubitemid 128178568)
11. Dulmin, R, and, Mininno, V. 2003. Supplier selection using a multi-criteria decision aid method. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 9 (4): 177-187. (Pubitemid 38613750)
12. Dyer, JS. 2005. MAUT-multiattribute utility theory. In Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys, Edited by: Figueira, J, Greco, S and Ehrgott, M. 266-295. New York: Springer.
13. Edwards, W. 1977. How to use multiattribute utility measurement for social decision making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 7 (5): 326-340.
14. Feremans, C, Labbé, M, and, Laporte, G. 2003. Generalized network design problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 148 (1): 1-13.
15. Figueira, J, and, Roy, B. 2002. Determining the weights of criteria in the ELECTRE type methods with a revised Simos procedure. European Journal of Operational Research, 139 (12): 317-326. (Pubitemid 34201242)
16. Garfamy, RM. 2006. A data envelopment analysis approach based on total cost of ownership for supplier selection. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 19 (6): 662-678. (Pubitemid 44704579)
17. Ghodsypour, SH, and, OBrien, C. 1998. A decision support system for supplier selection using an integrated analytic hierarchy process and linear programming. International Journal of Production Economics, 56-57 (1): 199-212. (Pubitemid 128400944)
18. Guitouni, A, and, Martel, J-M. 1998. Tentative guidelines to help choosing an appropriate MCDA method. European Journal of Operational Research, 109 (2): 501-521. (Pubitemid 128417848)
19. Ho, W, Xu, X, and, Dey, PK. 2010. Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 202 (1): 16-24.
20. Hou, L. Han, D., and Lin, Z., 2006. Research on supplier selection for inter-firm product collaborative development. In: IEEE Proceedings of the 6th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation, Dalian, China, 6988-6992 (Pubitemid 46540841)
21. Jain, V, Wadhwa, S, and, Deshmukh, SG. 2009. Select supplier-related issues in modelling a dynamic supply chain: potential, challenges and direction for future research. International Journal of Production Research, 47 (11): 3013-3039.
22. Kao, C. 2009. Efficiency measurement for parallel production systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 196 (3): 1107-1112.
23. Keeney, RL, and, Raiffa, H. 1976. Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs, New York: Wiley.
24. 2DE: a decision support system for collaborative design. Journal of Engineering Design, 21 (1): 31-48.
25. Krishnan, V, and, Ulrich, KT. 2001. Product development decisions: a review of the literature. Management Science, 47 (1): 1-21. (Pubitemid 34191959)
26. Kuo, RJ, Hong, SY, and, Huang, YC. 2010. Integration of particle swarm optimization-based fuzzy neural network and artificial neural network for supplier selection. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 34 (12): 3976-3990.
27. Li, W. Chen, Y., and Fu, Y., 2008. Combination of TOPSIS and 0-1 programming for supplier selection in supply chain management. In: IEEE International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control, Sanya, China, 1531-1535
28. Liu, J, Ding, F-Y, and, Lall, V. 2000. Using data envelopment analysis to compare suppliers for supplier selection and performance improvement. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 5 (3): 143-150. (Pubitemid 39034415)
29. Min, H. 1993. International supplier selection: a multi-attribute utility approach. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 24 (5): 24-33.
30. Monczka, RM. 2000. New product development: strategies for supplier integration, Milwaukee, WI: American Society for Quality.
31. Ng, WL. 2008. An efficient and simple model for multiple criteria supplier selection problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 186 (3): 1059-1067. (Pubitemid 350016638)
32. Roy, B. 1990. Decision-aid and decision making. European Journal of Operational Research, 45 (2-3): 324-331.
33. Saaty, TL. 1980. The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation, New York: McGraw-Hill.
34. Sen, S. 2008. A framework for defining both qualitative and quantitative supplier selection criteria considering the buyer-supplier integration strategies. International Journal of Production Research, 46 (7): 1825-1845. (Pubitemid 351270692)
35. Sevkli, M. 2010. An application of the fuzzy ELECTRE method for supplier selection. International Journal of Production Research, 48 (12): 3393-3405.
36. Seydel, J. 2005. Supporting the paradigm shift in vendor selection: multicriteria methods for sole-sourcing. Managerial Finance, 31 (3): 49-66. (Pubitemid 41050959)
37. Simon, HA. 1987. Decision making and problem solving. Interfaces, 17 (5): 11-31.
38. Singhal, J, and, Singhal, K. 2002. Supply chains and compatibility among components in product design. Journal of Operations Management, 20 (3): 289-302. (Pubitemid 34704330)
39. Stewart, TJ. 1996. Relationships between data envelopment analysis and multicriteria decision analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 47 (5): 654-665. (Pubitemid 126590743)
40. Timmerman, E. 1986. An approach to vendor performance evaluation. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 15 (3): 14-20.
41. Wagner, SM. 2010. Supplier traits for better customer firm innovation performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 39 (7): 1139-1149.
42. Wagner, SM, and, Hoegl, M. 2006. Involving suppliers in product development: insights from R&D directors and project managers. Industrial Marketing Management, 35 (8): 936-943. (Pubitemid 44138556)
43. Wang, G, Huang, SH, and, Dismukes, JP. 2004. Product-driven supply chain selection using integrated multi-criteria decision-making methodology. International Journal of Production Economics, 91 (1): 1-15.
44. Wang, HS, and, Che, ZH. 2007. An integrated model for supplier selection decisions in configuration changes. Expert Systems with Applications, 32 (4): 1132-1140. (Pubitemid 44821802)
45. Weber, CA. 1996. A data envelopment analysis approach to measuring vendor performance. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 1 (1): 28-39. (Pubitemid 39010568)
46. Weber, CA, Current, JR, and, Benton, WC. 1991. Vendor selection criteria and methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 50 (1): 2-18. (Pubitemid 21654539)
47. Wu, T, and, Blackhurst, J. 2009. Supplier evaluation and selection: an augmented DEA approach. International Journal of Production Research, 47 (16): 4593-4608.