Supplier evaluation and selection: An augmented DEA approach

International Journal of Production Research

Volumn 47, Issue 16, 2009, Pages 4593-4608

  Wu, Teresa ^a   Blackhurst, Jennifer ^b  

^a Arizona State University   (United States)

^b IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Data envelopment analysis; Supplier evaluation and selection

Indexed keywords

AVIATION ELECTRONICS; CROSS-EFFICIENCY; DEA MODELS; DISCRIMINATORY POWER; GLOBAL SUPPLY CHAIN; INPUT AND OUTPUTS; SUPER-EFFICIENCY; SUPPLIER EVALUATION AND SELECTION; SUPPLIER EVALUATIONS; WEIGHT CONSTRAINTS;

AVIONICS; DATA HANDLING; LINEAR PROGRAMMING; SUPPLY CHAINS;

DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS;

EID: 70449639989     PISSN: 00207543     EISSN: 1366588X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207540802054227     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Adler, N., Friedman, L., and Sinuany-Stern, Z., 2002. Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context. European Journal of Operational Research, 140 (2), 249-265.
2. Andersen, P. and Petersen, N., 1993. A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 39 (10), 1261-1294.
3. Araz, C. and Ozkarahan, I., 2007. Supplier evaluation and management system for strategic sourcing based on a new multicriteria sorting procedure. International Journal of Production Economics, 106 (2), 585-606.
4. Barbarosoglu, G. and Yazgac, T., 1997. An application of the analytic hierarchy process to the supplier selection problem. Production and Inventory Management Journal, 38 (2), 15-21.
5. Bardhan, I., Bowlin, W., Cooper, W., and Sueyoshi, T., 1996. Models for efficiency dominance in data envelopment analysis. Part 1: additive models and MED measures. Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan, 39 (3), 322-332.
6. Braglia, M. and Petroni, A., 2000. A quality assurance-oriented methodology for handling trade-offs in supplier selection. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 30 (2), 96-111.
7. Casu, B., Shaw, D., and Thanassoulis, E., 2005. Using a group support system to aid input-output identification in DEA. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 56 (12), 1363-1372.
8. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., and Rhodes, E., 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2 (6), 429-444.
9. Choi, T.Y. and Hartley, J.L., 1996. An exploration of supplier selection practices across the supply chain. Journal of Operations Management, 14 (4), 333-343.
10. Choy, K.L. and Lee, W.B., 2002. A generic tool for the selection and management of supplier relationships in an outsourced manufacturing environment: the application of case based reasoning. Logistics Information Management, 15 (4), 235-253.
11. Cooper, W., Park, K., and Yu, G., 1999. IDEA and AR-IDEA: models for dealing with imprecise data in DEA. Management Science, 45 (4), 597-607.
12. Despotis, D.K. and Smirlis, Y.G., 2002. Data envelopment analysis with imprecise data. European Journal of Operational Research, 140 (1), 24-36.
13. Dickson, G., 1966. An analysis of vendor selection systems and decisions. Journal of Purchasing, 2 (1), 5-17.
14. Doyle, J. and Green, R., 1994. Efficiency and cross-efficiency in DEA: derivations, meanings and uses. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 45 (4), 567-578.
15. Doyle, J., Green, R., and Cook, W.D., 1995. Cross-evaluation in DEA: improving discrimination among DMUs. Information Systems and Operational Research Journal, 33 (3), 205-222.
16. Ellram, L., 1995. Total cost of ownership: an analysis approach for purchasing. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 25 (8), 4-23.
17. Galagedera, D. and Silvapulle, P., 2003. Experimental evidence on robustness of data envelopment analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54 (6), 654-660.
18. Golany, B. and Roll, Y., 1994. Incorporating standards via data envelopment analysis approach, In: A. Charnes, ed. Data envelopment analysis: theory, method and application. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 313-328.
19. Lui, J, Ding, F., and Lall, V., 2000. Using data envelopment analysis to compare suppliers for supplier selection and performance improvement. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 5 (3), 143-150.
20. Mummalaneni, V., Dubas, K.M., and Chao, C., 1996. Chinese purchasing managers' p and trade-offs in supplier selection and performance evaluation. Industrial Marketing Management, 25 (2), 115-124.
21. Narasimhan, R., Talluri, S., and Mendez, D., 2001. Supplier evaluation and rationalization via data envelopment analysis: an empirical examination. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 37 (3), 28-37.
22. Nydick, R.L. and Hill, R.P., 1992. Using the analytic hierarchy process to structure the supplier selection procedure. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 28 (2), 31-36.
23. Sexton, T.R., Silkman, R.H., and Hogan, A.J., 1986. Data envelopment analysis: critique and extensions, In: R.H. Silkman, ed. Measuring efficiency: an assessment of data envelopment analysis. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass, 73-105.
24. Sinuany-Stern, Z., Mehrez, A., and Barboy, A., 1994. Academic departments efficiency via data envelopment analysis. Computer and Operations Research, 21 (5), 543-556.
25. Talluri, S., 2002. Enhancing supply decisions through the use of efficient marginal costs models. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 38 (4), 4-10.
26. Talluri, S. and Narasimhan, R., 2003. Vendor Evaluation with performance variability: a max-min approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 146 (3), 543-552.
27. Talluri, S. and Narasimhan, R., 2004. A methodology for strategic sourcing. European Journal of Operational Research, 154 (1), 236-250.
28. Talluri, S. and Narasimhan, R., 2005. A note on a methodology for supply base optimization. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 52 (1), 130-139.
29. Talluri, S., Narasimhan, R., and Nair, A., 2006. Vendor performance with supply risk: a chance-constrained DEA Approach. International Journal of Production Research, 100 (2), 212-222.
30. Weber, C.A. and Ellram, L.M., 1992. Supplier selection using multi-objective programming: a decision support system approach. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 23 (2), 3-14.
31. Weber, C. and Desai, A., 1996. Determination of paths to vendor market efficiency using parallel coordinates representation: a negotiation tool for buyers. European Journal of Operational Research, 90 (1), 142-155.
32. Weber, C., Currant, J., and Desai, A., 1998. Non-cooperative negotiation strategies for vendor selection. European Journal of Operational Research, 108, 208-223.
33. Wei, S., Zhang, J. and Li, Z., 1997. A supplier-selecting system using a neural network. In: IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Processing Systems, 28-31 October Beijing, China, 468-471.